双语阅读 | 大学生能忍住一个多小时不碰手机吗?

大学生能忍住一个多小时不碰手机吗?Can College Students Stand to Ditch Their Phones for an Hour or So? 文本难度:考研Nearly every student clutches a phone in one hand as they traverse the University of Central Florida campus, even while walking in groups. Laptops and tablets are lunchtime companions, and earbuds and headphones are routine accessories. While waiting for class to start, many students sit in silence, drawn into their devices. 在中佛罗里达大学的校园里,几乎每个学生手里都紧紧攥着一部手机,哪怕是一群人结伴而行也是如此。笔记本电脑和平板成了午餐时间的标配,耳机和耳塞更是日常必备。在课前等待的间隙,许多学生也是安静坐着,全身心沉浸在自己的电子设备中。It is a familiar and exasperating scene for Seán Killingsworth, 22, a former U. C. F. Student. “What is this life I’m signing up for?” he asked himself during his sophomore year. “It was just like, I’m talking to a bunch of zombies.” 对于22岁、曾在中佛罗里达大学上过学的肖恩·基林斯沃思(Seán Killingsworth)来说,这是一幕既熟悉又令人无奈的场景。“我来读大学就是为了过这种生活吗?”他在大二时曾这样问自己,“感觉我就像在跟一群行尸走肉说话。”Mr. Killingsworth craved a space where he could chat with his peers without feeling as though he was intruding. When he was in high school, he ran into similar conundrums, so he would organize phone-free hangouts with friends. Why not in college too? 基林斯沃思渴望能有这样一个空间,能让他可以和同龄人畅聊,而不会觉得自己在打扰别人。上高中时,他也遇到过类似的难题,所以他会组织朋友们一起进行“无手机聚会”。既然如此,为什么上了大学就不能这么做呢?In 2023, he helped bring the idea of no-phone social time to two different Florida campuses – U. C. F. And Rollins College. He called it the Reconnect Movement: During meetings, everyone was required to hand over their phone and socialize without devices, a concept that has become a big draw for like-minded students. 2023年,他将“无手机社交时间”的理念带到了佛罗里达州的两所高校——中佛罗里达大学和罗林斯学院。他称之为“重连运动(Reconnect Movement)”:在聚会期间,每个人都必须上交手机,在没有电子设备干扰的情况下进行交流。这一理念对许多志同道合的学生产生了巨大吸引力。Reconnect’s popularity dovetails with a cultural shift in how smartphones and social media are perceived by adults and adolescents alike. Experts have sounded the alarm about the potential mental health dangers of digital media, even though it’s hard to prove a causal connection between this technology and the rising rates of loneliness, anxiety and depression in young people. “重连运动”的流行,恰与成年人和青少年对智能手机及社交媒体的看法发生文化性转变的现象相呼应。尽管目前很难证明数字媒体与年轻人中日益加剧的孤独、焦虑和抑郁发生率之间存在直接的因果关系,专家们还是就其可能带来的心理健康隐患敲响了警钟。Campaigns to reduce or delay smartphone use like “Wait Until 8th” and books like Jonathan Haidt’s best-selling “The Anxious Generation” have struck a deep chord, particularly with parents. 诸如“等到八年级再用手机(Wait Until 8th)”这类旨在减少或推迟使用智能手机的倡议,以及乔纳森·海特(Jonathan Haidt)的畅销书《焦虑的一代》(The Anxious Generation)等书籍,都深深触动了公众,尤其是家长群体。Student-led movements have often encouraged phone abstinence, but Mr. Killingsworth’s Reconnect Movement doesn’t push students to change their relationship with technology. Instead, it aims to create what he called “human connection habitats” that eliminate the need for willpower. 以往由学生发起的运动往往鼓励大家戒掉手机,但基林斯沃思的“重连运动”并没有强迫学生去改变自身与科技的关系。相反,它的目标是打造他所说的“人类联结栖息地”,让人们不再需要依靠意志力来抵抗手机的诱惑。The idea isn’t particularly novel, Mr. Killingsworth said, but novel isn’t what his generation needs. “Gen Z needs a normal that we’ve never experienced,” he said. 基林斯沃思表示,这个想法其实并不新奇,但他这一代人需要的本就不是新奇,“Z世代需要的是一种我们从未体验过的‘正常生活’。”On a recent sticky afternoon nearly 40 students gathered at the U. C. F. Campus arboretum for the first Reconnect meeting of the fall semester. After surrendering their devices to a “phone valet,” they sat cross-legged on patchwork blankets and prepared to spend one hour without screens. 最近,在一个闷热潮湿的下午,近40名学生聚集在中佛罗里达大学校园的树木园,举行秋季学期的第一次“重连”聚会。在将设备交给“手机代管员”后,他们盘腿坐在拼布毯子上,准备共同度过一个小时没有电子屏幕的时光。As a CD player belted out reggae music from the band Stick Figure, many of the students began to make eye contact and small talk. You would be forgiven for thinking you had been transported back 20 years. 当CD机播放起 Stick Figure 乐队的雷鬼音乐,许多学生开始看向彼此并闲聊起来。这一幕,难免让人恍惚,以为自己穿越回了二十年前。【词汇】1. traverse v. 横穿;走过2. exasperating adj.使人沮丧的3. sophomore n. (高中或大学的)二年级学生4. zombie n. 僵尸;行尸走肉般的人5. conundrum n. 难题6. dovetail v. 完美契合7. causal adj.有因果关系的8. abstinence n.戒除9. Gen Z n. Z世代(通常指1997-2012年间出生的人)10. arboretum n. 植物园;树木园11. valet n. 男仆从,文中特指帮忙保管手机的人12. reggae n. 雷鬼音乐(本文图片来源于摄图网,版权归摄图网所有)

双语阅读 | 狗狗如何让青少年不再那么焦虑

双语阅读 | 狗狗如何让青少年不再那么焦虑How dogs make teens feel less anxious文本难度:考研Dogs have been a part of human society for over 20,000 years. Whereas they first served people by supporting hunters, it did not take long before they became part of the home. Companion dogs may not help secure food, but for years, evidence has mounted that they help diminish anxiety and improve sociality.狗与人类相伴已有两万多年。最初,它们协助人类狩猎;但没过多久,便走进了千家万户。虽然作为伴侣的狗狗不再帮我们获取食物,但多年来,越来越多的证据表明,它们能有效缓解焦虑、促进社交。Research led by Kikusui Takefumi at Azabu University in Japan, published recently in iScience, explains what might be going on. It reveals that the microbes found in the guts of dog owners are notably different from those who do not own dogs and that this is, at least partially, responsible for the behavioral differences.日本麻布大学的菊水健史(Takefumi Kikusui)团队近期在《交叉科学》(iScience)期刊发表的一项研究,揭示了其中可能的机制:养狗者的肠道微生物组成明显异于不养狗的人,而这种差异至少在一定程度上解释了两类人行为上的不同。The brain does not exist in isolation. The microbes found elsewhere, particularly in the gut, produce chemical compounds that influence how the brain works. Those microbes are heavily affected by diet, but are also shaped by factors like stress, pollutants, and exercise. Dr Kikusui knew from his own research that having a dog influenced the microbiota of the human gut, too. With this in mind, he wondered if microbe transfer from dogs might be helping confer psychological benefits on owners. Keen to find out, he set up an experiment with 343 participants in Tokyo.大脑并非是孤立运作的。身体其他部位——尤其是肠道——的微生物会产生多种化学物质,从而影响大脑的运作。这些微生物深受饮食影响,同时也受到压力、污染物和运动等因素的影响。菊水博士从前期研究中得知,养狗也会改变人体肠道菌群。由此,他想到:狗狗身上的微生物是否可能通过某种方式转移给人类,并带来心理上的益处?为了验证这一猜想,他在东京开展了一项涉及343名参与者的研究。Dr Kikusui specifically worked with teenagers. His reason for this was that adolescence is a crucial period of brain development, when social interactions often have lasting mental effects; if microbes from dogs were reducing teen anxiety and increasing teen sociality, then this would yield long-term benefits. He and his colleagues therefore psychologically analyzed 96 teens who were dog owners and 247 teens who were not. As expected, dog owners suffered from fewer social problems. More specifically, they showed reduced aggression, diminished delinquent behavior, and less social withdrawal.菊水博士特意选择了青少年作为研究对象,因为青春期是大脑发育的关键阶段,这个时期的社交经历往往会对心理健康产生长远影响。如果来自狗狗身上的微生物真的能减轻青少年的焦虑、增强其社交能力,那么这种益处很可能会持续一生。因此,他和同事对96名养狗的青少年与247名不养狗的青少年进行了心理评估。结果正如预期:养狗的青少年在社交方面遇到的问题更少。更具体地说,他们表现出的攻击性更低,违纪行为更少,社交退缩倾向也更轻微。Dr Kikusui and his colleagues then collected saliva samples from the participants and noted that several variants of Streptococcus and Prevotella 7 bacteria were significantly more abundant in samples from dog owners. They further found that participants in whom these key microbe variants were rare also tended to have more delinquent behaviors. This finding suggested that microbes, added to the human gut by dogs, may be influencing the brains of their owners in healthy ways.随后,菊水博士及其同事采集了参与者的唾液样本,并发现:养狗青少年的样本中,几种链球菌(Streptococcus)和普雷沃氏菌属第7类(Prevotella 7)的变体会多得多。他们进一步观察到,那些体内缺乏这些关键微生物变体的参与者,往往有更多的违纪行为。这一发现表明,狗狗带入人类肠道的微生物,可能正以有益的方式影响着主人的大脑功能。The ideal next step for Dr Kikusui would have been to infuse dog microbes into the bodies of non-dog-owning teens. Since that is an ethically grey area, he worked instead with mice. He cultured microbe samples from both groups of teens in the lab and fed them to 24 mice. After six weeks, he monitored them as they were put through a series of murine sociality tests, which included examinations of how long they spent sniffing unfamiliar mice and how close they would get to a distressed mouse that had previously been their cage-mate.理想情况下,菊水博士下一步本想将狗狗相关的微生物直接移植到不养狗的青少年体内,以验证其效果。但鉴于这种做法涉及伦理争议,他转而采用小鼠进行实验。研究团队在实验室中培养了两组青少年的微生物样本,并将其喂给24只小鼠。六周后,研究人员对这些小鼠进行了一系列社交行为测试,包括观察它们花多长时间嗅探陌生小鼠,以及当曾经同笼的伙伴处于痛苦状态时,它们会主动靠近到什么程度。Remarkably, mice carrying the microbes of teen dog owners spent up to 14 seconds sniffing unfamiliar mice, whereas mice carrying the microbes of teens without dogs spent a paltry six seconds doing so. A similar result played out with the distressed mouse test—mice with the microbes of teen dog owners often spent more than 21 seconds checking on the distressed mouse, while the other mice never spent more than three seconds doing so. Dr Kikusui admits that making direct comparisons between murine and human behavior is not ideal, but his findings nonetheless indicate that the microbiotic changes brought about by dog ownership influence the brain. If the conclusions hold, it seems that the path to a healthier mind may begin not with introspection, but with a nuzzle and a few licks.令人惊讶的是,携带养狗青少年的微生物的小鼠,会花多达14秒的时间去嗅探陌生小鼠;而携带不养狗青少年的微生物的小鼠,这一时间仅有6秒。在有关“靠近痛苦鼠友”的测试中,也出现了类似结果:前者常常花超过21秒的时间去查看处于痛苦状态的鼠友,而后者从未超过3秒。菊水博士坦言,将小鼠行为直接与人类行为类比并不算理想,但研究结果依然清晰表明:养狗所引发的肠道菌群变化,确实会影响大脑功能。如果这些结论经得起进一步验证,那似乎可以说,通往更健康的精神状态的路,或许并非始于内省,而是始于狗狗的一次依偎和几次舔舐。【词汇】1. microbe n. 微生物2. microbiota n. 微生物群3. aggression n. 攻击性4. delinquent adj. 违法的;不良行为的5. saliva n. 唾液6. infuse v. 注入;灌输7. ethically adj. 伦理地;道德地8. culture v. 培养(细胞或细菌)9. paltry adj. 微不足道的;很少的10. murine adj. 鼠类的;鼠的11. introspection n. 内省;反省12. nuzzle n. 用鼻子轻触;依偎(本文图片来源于摄图网,版权归摄图网所有)

新闻听力 | 社交媒体为何让人欲罢不能?

社交媒体为何让人欲罢不能?What Science Can Teach Us About the Pull of Social Media常速 | 六级偏难 | 505词 | 3min18s刘立军供稿Part I. QUESTIONSListen to the passage and choose the best answer to each question you hear.Q1. What does the author say about the DSM-5 and social media addiction?A. It has classified SMA as a distinct mental disorder.B. It does not recognize SMA as a distinct mental disorder.C. It suggests that SMA should be treated with medication.D. It proves that SMA is a form of behavioral addiction.Q2. According to the passage, which personality trait may be a risk factor for compulsive social media behavior? A. Extroversion.B. Agreeableness.C. Neuroticism.D. Conscientiousness.Q3. What can be inferred from the passage about the future of social media addiction research?A. It may lead to legal regulations similar to those for gambling.B. It has already provided clear answers to all related questions.C. It proves that personality is the only cause of social media addiction.D. It shows that social media addiction is less serious than drug addiction.Q4. What question does the author raise regarding children and social media?A. Whether children should be banned from using social media.B. Whether social media should be legislated like tobacco and alcohol.C. Whether children should be guided on what to view on social media.D. Whether social media platforms should be redesigned for children.Q5. What is the main purpose of the passage?A. To argue that social media should be banned for users.B. To describe a court case about social media addiction.C. To prove that social media addiction is a mental disorder.D. To explore the pull of social media and related concerns.Part II. TRANSCRIPTWhat Science Can Teach Us About the Pull of Social MediaYou have probably heard of the social-media addiction trial that recently took place in Los Angeles. A young woman took Meta and YouTube to court, accusing them of making her addicted to social media — and she won.This was an interesting court case, and one that raises many questions — questions that there are currently no clear answers to, but that people ought to think about, especially as they are likely to pop up in many upcoming debates.Social media is extensively used.As many as one in every three people use social media, and in the USA, people are reportedly spending around 6 hours a day on it. In 2025, Facebook was the most popular social media platform with over 3 billion users, closely followed by WhatsApp and Instagram, which both had about 3 billion users. Approximately 60% of the global population use some kind of social media, if not multiple platforms. With such extensive use, it is not strange that social media addiction (SMA) has become a focal point for many researchers.focal adj. 中心的;重要的Is social media addictive? (Q1) It is worth noting that the DSM-5 (the diagnostic tool for psychologists) does not recognize SMA as a distinct mental disorder; it is often discussed as a condition that requires more research. Thus, the conversations around SMA are not necessarily straightforward.DSM-5 《精神障碍诊断与统计手册》第五版diagnostic adj. 诊断的;用于判断的Within the research literature, SMA has been described as a specific form of digital technology addiction. It refers to the excessive and compulsive use of social media platforms, which can lead to detrimental life consequences. SMA shares components with behavioral disorders like gambling, including salience, mood modification, tolerance, withdrawal, conflict, and relapse.compulsive adj. 强迫性的;难以自控的salience n. 显著性relapse n. 复发;重新陷入(不良状态)(Q2) In a study reviewing over 30,000 participants’ scores on media addiction and personality, it was found that neuroticism can be a risk factor for compulsive social media behavior. Even though the relationship was not very strong, it perhaps indicates that some people may be more likely to become addicted. There are other personality characteristics associated with increased likelihood of compulsion, such as narcissism, Machiavellianism, and psychopathy. But it needs to be mentioned that there may be external factors that contribute to the link between excessive social media use and personality. It is even possible that SMA may vary depending on the platform that individuals use.compulsion n. 强迫(行为);难以抗拒的冲动narcissism n. 自恋;自我中心Machiavellianism n. 权谋主义psychopathy n. 精神病态Should social media be legislated?To what extent social media ought to be controlled by law is a difficult question to address. Just as with debates around tobacco, alcohol, and gambling, there are bound to be varied opinions. (Q3) As more researchers appear to agree that SMA may be a genuine addictive disorder, then presumably, as with other substances, it should be managed to reduce potential risks. (Q4) The cognitive complexity involved in deciding what to view online is also one that should be carefully debated when it comes to children. In most societies, children are guided as to what they can watch in the cinema or on television. It is difficult to see why social media ought to be any different.Part III. KEYQ1. B.【解析】细节题。题目出处为:“It is worth noting that the DSM-5 (the diagnostic tool for psychologists) does not recognize SMA as a distinct mental disorder; it is often discussed as a condition that requires more research.”。意为:“值得注意的是,《精神障碍诊断与统计手册》第五版(心理学家使用的诊断工具)并不未将社交媒体成瘾视为一种独立的精神障碍;它通常被视为一种需要进一步研究的状况来讨论。”因此,正确答案为B。Q2. C.【解析】细节题。题目出处为:“In a study reviewing over 30,000 participants’ scores on media addiction and personality, it was found that neuroticism can be a risk factor for compulsive social media behavior.” 意为:“一项针对3万余名参与者在媒体成瘾和人格特质方面评分的研究发现,神经质可能是强迫性社交媒体使用行为的一个风险因素。” 该句明确指出神经质是风险因素之一,因此,正确答案为C。Q3. A.【解析】推理题。题目出处为:“As more researchers appear to agree that SMA may be a genuine addictive disorder, then presumably, as with other substances, it should be managed to reduce potential risks.”。意为:“随着越来越多的研究者似乎认同社交媒体成瘾可能是一种真实存在的成瘾性障碍,那么可以推断,就像对待其他成瘾物质一样,也应对其进行管控,以减少潜在风险。”由此可以推断,正确答案为A。Q4. C.【解析】细节题。题目出处为:“The cognitive complexity involved in deciding what to view online is also one that should be carefully debated when it comes to children. In most societies, children are guided as to what they can watch in the cinema or on television. It is difficult to see why social media ought to be any different.” 意为:“在涉及儿童时,对于在线内容选择所涉及的认知复杂性,也应进行审慎的讨论。在大多数社会中,儿童观看影院或电视节目的内容都会受到引导和限制,而社交媒体在这方面显然不应例外。” 该段表明作者认为儿童在社交媒体上的浏览内容也应受到引导,因此正确答案为C。Q5. D.【解析】主旨题。全文围绕社交媒体的吸引力、是否成瘾、以及应如何应对展开探讨,因此主要探讨社交媒体的吸引力及其引发的担忧,正确答案为D。 (本文图片来源于摄图网,版权归摄图网所有)

新闻听力 | 何为智者?

何为智者?What makes a person wise?常速 | 五级(易)| 350词 | 2min18s刘立军供稿Part I. QUESTIONSListen to the news and choose the best answer to each question you hear.Q1. According to the text, what do all cultures not agree on regarding wisdom? A. Its importance in society. B. Its definition and components. C. Its connection to intelligence. D. Its role in spiritual practices. Q2. What are the two characteristics associated with wisdom according to the study? A. Emotional stability and logical reasoning. B. Intelligence and cultural adaptability. C. Compassionate love and spiritual understanding. D. Socio-emotional awareness and reflective orientation. Q3. What can be inferred about the role of emotions in being perceived as wise? A. Emotions should always be suppressed to appear wise. B. Emotions are irrelevant to the perception of wisdom. C. Emotions need to be balanced with logical thinking. D. Emotions are more important than reflective orientation. Q4. What does the apple pie analogy in ‘The Cambridge Handbook of Wisdom’ illustrate? A. Different cultures have their own unique wisdom traditions. B. Wisdom is like an apple pie that everyone enjoys equally. C. Wisdom is universally agreed upon across cultures. D. Wisdom is best understood through spiritual practices. Q5. What is the main purpose of the text? A. To explore the universal definition of wisdom. B. To discuss how wisdom is perceived across cultures. C. To highlight the importance of emotional intelligence. D. To explain the relationship between wisdom and intelligence. Part II. TRANSCRIPTWhat makes a person wise?Think of the wisest person you know. What is it that makes them wise? What qualities do they have? Does wisdom mean the same for you as it does for me? (Q1) All cultures value wisdom, but not all cultures agree on its definition. For some, the focus is on intelligence, while others emphasise compassionate love for others. In some cultures, a spiritual component is required to be considered wise. Are there any aspects of wisdom that all cultures can agree on?compassionate adj. 富有同情心的 A group of 34 researchers from all over the world and from fields like psychology, philosophy and anthropology got together to explore ‘Dimensions of wisdom perception across twelve countries on five continents’. The study found two characteristics that everyone — from urban university students in Peru to villagers in rural India — associated with wisdom.anthropology n. 人类学 perception n. 感知,认识 (Q2-1) The first quality a wise person must have is ‘socio-emotional awareness’. This is about the ability to understand others’ point of view and really care about their thoughts and feelings.(Q2-2) However, this person must also have the second quality: ‘reflective orientation’, which is about using logic and past experience to make judgments. (Q3) If you are mindlessly driven by emotions and don’t think before you act, then you are unlikely to be perceived as wise. So, if you want to be wise, learn to both keep your cool and put yourself in others’ shoes.But, while this study helps us build a more unified definition of wisdom, the world is vast and cultures vary hugely. In ‘The Cambridge Handbook of Wisdom’, the authors make an apple pie analogy, comparing pie to wisdom. Imagine your grandmother makes your favourite apple pie — she represents the wisdom you think is best. Now, imagine you take this apple pie to the Amazon rainforest, where apples don’t grow. For the locals, the pie isn’t as good as their own traditional desserts; they’ve grown up with different flavours and ingredients, (Q4) just as different cultures have developed their own wisdom traditions. Ultimately, the way wisdom is experienced, shared, and valued depends on the cultural ingredients involved.analogy n. 类比,比喻 Part III. KEYQ1. B.【解析】细节题。根据“All cultures value wisdom, but not all cultures agree on its definition.”,可见所有文化都重视智慧,但都对智慧的定义看法不一致。正确答案为B。 Q2. D.【解析】细节题。根据“The first quality a wise person must have is ‘socio-emotional awareness’.”以及“However, this person must also have the second quality: ‘reflective orientation’”,可知研究将智慧与两大特质联系起来。第一个特质是“社会情感认知”,第二个特质是“反思思辨能力”。正确答案为D。 Q3. C.【解析】推理题。根据“If you are mindlessly driven by emotions and don’t think before you act, then you are unlikely to be perceived as wise.”,可知如果被情绪盲目驱使,且在行动前不假思索就不算有智慧,由此可推断,情绪需要与逻辑思维相互平衡,因此正确答案为C。 Q4. A.【解析】细节题。根据“Just as different cultures have developed their own wisdom traditions.”,可知不同文化发展了自己的智慧传统。苹果派的类比意在说明不同文化拥有各自独特的智慧传统,因此正确答案为A。 Q5. B.【解析】主旨题。根据全文,文章主要探讨了智慧在不同文化中的定义和感知方式,因此正确答案为B。 (本文图片来源于摄图网,版权归摄图网所有)

新闻听力 | 我们应该害怕人工智能吗?

我们应该害怕人工智能吗?Should we fear AI? 常速 | 五级(偏难)| 345词 | 2min9s刘立军供稿Part I. QUESTIONSListen to the news and choose the best answer to each question you hear.Q1. What is one reason Elon Musk and other experts called for a pause in advanced AI development? A. To address potential risks posed by human-competitive intelligence. B. To promote AI’s use in solving global problems. C. To reduce the economic impact of AI on job markets. D. To advance communication technologies like Skype. Q2. What does The Future of Life Institute suggest about advanced AI systems? A. They should be developed faster to solve global problems. B. They can help reduce poverty in poorer countries. C. They pose profound risks to society and humanity. D. They are unlikely to replace human intelligence. Q3. According to Goldman Sachs, what is one possible impact of AI on the job market? A. AI will eliminate the need for human workers entirely. B. AI could replace 300 million full-time jobs. C. AI may create a productivity boom and new jobs. D. AI will only affect jobs in the technology sector. Q4. What is the main purpose of the passage? A. To explain how AI works in modern technology. B. To discuss the potential benefits and risks of AI development. C. To highlight the economic advantages of AI. D. To promote AI’s use in solving global problems. Q5. What can be inferred about Bill Gates’ view on AI? A. He doubts AI’s ability to address global challenges. B. He suggests governments should collaborate with industry to manage AI risks. C. He believes AI will primarily benefit developed countries. D. He thinks AI development should be paused indefinitely. Part II. TRANSCRIPTShould we fear AI? There is no doubt that artificial intelligence - or AI - has become an important part of our lives. It is no longer just a thing of science fiction: it’s an incredible technological breakthrough that has changed the way we live. (Q4-1) But there are fears that AI has become too intelligent and could be a threat to humanity.This claim might sound extreme, but (Q1) a letter signed by more than 1,000 technology experts, including Tesla boss Elon Musk, called on the world to press pause on the development of more advanced AI because of the risks. Estonian billionaire Jaan Tallinn, for example, who helped develop communication app Skype, thinks we should be cautious. And The Future of Life Institute, a not-for-profit organisation, says that there should be a temporary pause in advanced AI development, saying that (Q2) “AI systems with human-competitive intelligence can pose profound risks to society and humanity.”Tesla n. 特斯拉(公司名,指特斯拉汽车公司) billionaire n. 亿万富翁 This pessimistic outlook is supported by (Q3) a report by investment bank Goldman Sachs that says AI could replace the equivalent of 300 million full-time jobs. But it may also mean new jobs and a productivity boom. We may argue that AI such as chatbots can help us. State-of-the-art ChatGPT, for example, has been helping some students write assignments. AI is allowing computers to think or act in a more human way. And machine learning means computers can learn what to do without being given explicit instructions. The technology is impressive, but as it starts to think for itself, will it outsmart us?Some people are more optimistic. (Q4-2) AI advocates say the tech is already delivering real social and economic benefits for people. Meanwhile, the founder of Microsoft, (Q5) Bill Gates, has called on governments to work with industry to “limit the risks” of AI. But he says the technology could save lives, particularly in poorer countries. He says, “Just as the world needs its brightest people focused on its biggest problems, we will need to focus the world’s best AIs on its biggest problems.” If this happens, maybe humanity will have a future.Part III. KEYQ1. A.【解析】细节题。根据“a letter signed by more than 1,000 technology experts, including Tesla boss Elon Musk, called on the world to press pause on the development of more advanced AI because of the risks.”,可知包括特斯拉老板埃隆·马斯克在内的1000多位技术专家签署了一封信,呼吁全球暂停开发更先进的人工智能,是因为其存在风险。正确答案为A。 Q2. C.【解析】细节题。根据“AI systems with human-competitive intelligence can pose profound risks to society and humanity.”,可知该机构认为具有与人类竞争性智能的人工智能系统可能会给社会和人类带来极大隐患。正确答案为C。 Q3. B.【解析】细节题。根据“a report by investment bank Goldman Sachs that says AI could replace the equivalent of 300 million full-time jobs.,可知高盛报告指出,人工智能可能会替代3亿个全职工作岗位。正确答案为B。 Q4. B.【解析】主旨题。根据“there are fears that AI has become too intelligent and could be a threat to humanity.”以及“AI advocates say the tech is already delivering real social and economic benefits for people”,可知文章先讲述人们担忧 AI 带来的各类风险,可能对人类构成威胁,又介绍AI 带来的社会经济益处,主要讨论了人工智能发展的利弊。正确答案为B。 Q5. B.【解析】推理题。根据“Bill Gates has called on governments to work with industry to ‘limit the risks’ of AI.”,可知比尔·盖茨呼吁政府与行业合作以“限制人工智能的风险”。由此可以推断,比尔·盖茨认为应该合作采取措施管控人工智能的风险,但并非完全暂停发展,因此正确答案为B。 (本文图片来源于摄图网,版权归摄图网所有)

新闻听力 | 教育网红猝然离世,他曾为千万学子规划“成功路径”

教育网红猝然离世,他曾为千万学子规划“成功路径”The Sudden Death of a Man Who Told Chinese Kids How to Succeed常速 | 六级 偏难 | 596词 | 3min27s刘立军供稿Part I. QUESTIONSListen to the passage and choose the best answer to each question you hear.Q1. What was Zhang Xuefeng known for as China’s most famous education influencer?A. Teaching students how to improve their physical health.B. Giving direct and harsh advice on how to achieve success.C. Encouraging students to pursue their idealistic dreams.D. Writing best-selling books about liberal arts education.Q2. According to the passage, how did Zhang Xuefeng view the liberal arts and finance?A. Liberal arts are good for high-paying jobs, and finance requires luck.B. Liberal arts only suit rich students, and finance is a safe choice.C. Liberal arts mainly lead to service jobs, and finance needs connections.D. Liberal arts offer many opportunities, and finance is easy to enter.Q3. What questions did people on social media ask after Zhang Xuefeng’s sudden death?A. Whether his advice helped young people or discouraged their idealism.B. Whether he regretted being too harsh in his public comments.C. Whether his family would continue his consulting company.D. Whether the government would regulate education influencers.Q4. What can be inferred about Zhang Xuefeng’s attitude towards career choices for students from ordinary families?A. He believed they should pursue their dreams regardless of money.B. He thought they should choose practical majors to support living.C. He suggested they should avoid going to any university at all.D. He argued that only wealthy families have the right to choose.Q5. What is the main idea of the passage?A. Zhang believed students should study journalism despite poor job prospects.B. Zhang was the most popular influencer who helped wealthy students.C. Zhang’s videos and livestreams were banned by the government.D. Zhang’s sudden death made people rethink his advice and work culture.Part II. TRANSCRIPTThe Sudden Death of a Man Who Told Chinese Kids How to SucceedAny Chinese parent or student fixated on education — so, basically, most Chinese parents and students — knew the name Zhang Xuefeng. (Q1) As China’s most famous education influencer, Mr. Zhang was known for dispensing ruthlessly blunt advice about how to maximize a student’s chances at success.fixate v. 专注于;对……过分执著(Q2) The liberal arts? Only good for service jobs, he declared. Finance? Don’t bother unless your family has connections. Fast-talking and sharp-tongued, to his detractors, he was cynical and utilitarian. But to his tens of millions of fans, he embodied a rare willingness to acknowledge the harsh realities facing less privileged students, especially in the face of steep inequality and a slowing economy.detractor n. 贬低者;诋毁者utilitarian adj. 功利的;实用主义的So when Mr. Zhang suddenly died on Tuesday at age 41, of cardiac arrest, it prompted an outpouring — not only of shock, but also of reflection.cardiac adj. 心脏的;心脏病的outpouring n. (情感的)涌出,迸发(Q3) On social media, people asked: Had he steered young Chinese to better lives or discouraged their idealism? (5) What did his abrupt death, after he had long complained of being exhausted and overworked, say about China’s hypercompetitive work culture? And if life was so unpredictable, did planning so carefully for success that seemed increasingly out of reach even matter?hypercompetitive adj. 高度竞争的;竞争异常激烈的“Zhang Xuefeng’s lesson to lost young people: Enjoy your life,” was one of the top hashtags on Chinese social media on Wednesday, where news of Mr. Zhang’s death dominated discussion. “Excessive self-discipline” was another, a response to state media reports that Mr. Zhang had collapsed after going for a run in Suzhou, the city in eastern China where he lived.Another popular education influencer, Zhu Wei, posted a long tribute online, praising Mr. Zhang’s vigor and sincerity. Mr. Zhu urged his own students to slow down in their pursuit of test scores and jobs.“But I also know, what’s the cruelest thing about the age of internet traffic? It’s that nothing lasts even a month before it’s forgotten,” Mr. Zhu wrote. “Everyone will soon go back to their usual state, endlessly striving and slogging, never able to stop.”slog v. 埋头苦干;坚持不懈地努力Mr. Zhang was born in a small town in northern China. His real name was Zhang Zibiao, though he later adopted the name Xuefeng. He tested into a middling university, where he studied water supply and drainage, for which he had little enthusiasm, according to interviews he gave. After graduation, he turned to tutoring and college counseling.He shot to fame in 2016, for a video in which he — in what would become his signature rapid-fire, snark-infused patter — summarized China’s top 34 universities in seven minutes. He started a consulting company where he helped students choose majors, internships, and careers based on cold-eyed considerations of their test scores, family backgrounds, and whether they prioritized money or stability. His livestreams attracted hundreds of thousands of views, and his courses could cost thousands of dollars.patter n. 顺口溜;(饶舌的)念叨internship n. 实习;实习期His celebrity came as much from his advice as his willingness to provoke. A comment in 2023 that parents should knock their children unconscious rather than let them study journalism, because of the weak job prospects, set off days of online debate. Critics said he misunderstood the point of education or was suggesting that poorer students shouldn’t follow their dreams.“I come from an ordinary family,” Mr. Zhang wrote in response. (Q4) “If you come from a wealthy family, you have more choices, you can’t choose wrongly. But most families aren’t that well-off, and when choosing a major, you have to choose one that’s suitable and will put food on the table.”Part III. KEYQ1. B.【解析】细节题。题目出处为:“As China’s most famous education influencer, Mr. Zhang was known for dispensing ruthlessly blunt advice about how to maximize a student’s chances at success.”。意为:“作为中国最著名的教育类网红,张雪峰以提供直截了当的建议而闻名,这些建议聚焦于如何最大限度地提升学生未来成功的几率。”因此正确答案为B。Q2. C.【解析】细节题。题目出处为:“The liberal arts? Only good for service jobs, he declared. Finance? Don’t bother unless your family has connections.”。意为:“人文学科?他宣称只适合服务业。金融?除非家里有关系,否则别费劲了。”该句明确指出张雪峰认为人文学科主要通向服务类工作,而金融行业需要家庭人脉,因此正确答案为C。Q3. A.【解析】细节题。题目出处为:“On social media, people asked: Had he steered young Chinese to better lives or discouraged their idealism?”。 意为:“在社交媒体上,人们纷纷发问:他究竟是引导了中国年轻人走向更好的生活,还是打击了他们的理想主义?”因此正确答案为A。Q4. B.【解析】推理题。题目出处为:“If you come from a wealthy family, you have more choices, you can’t choose wrongly. But most families aren’t that well-off, and when choosing a major, you have to choose one that’s suitable and will put food on the table.”。意为:“如果你来自富裕家庭,你有更多选择,你不会选错。但大多数家庭并不那么富裕,在选择专业时,你必须选择一个合适的、能养家糊口的专业。”该句明确指出张雪峰认为普通家庭的学生应该选择实际且能维持生计的专业,因此正确答案为B。Q5. D.【解析】主旨题。文章的核心内容是张雪峰的突然离世引发了人们对其各种教育建议以及中国高度竞争性的工作文化的反思,因此正确答案为D。(本文图片来源于摄图网,版权归摄图网所有)

第12届教学大赛商务英语组特等奖潘紫萌授课

授课点评:潘紫萌老师在本次大赛中与来自全国各地的商务英语优秀教师展开激烈角逐,在教学理念、教学方法、课堂设计、英语素质、商务知识、教姿教态、师生互动等方面的表现都较突出,最后以总分第一荣获特等奖。潘老师以准确的英语发音先声夺人,丰富的表达方式、适中的语调语速和端庄的教姿教态也令人印象深刻。在课程设计环节,为实现其教学目标,她选择business ethics作为主题,介绍了教学目标、学生特征、以学生为中心和以产出为导向的教学理念,以及线上线下结合、传统和高科技媒体结合等丰富多彩的教学方式。这份介绍全面立体但简明扼要,为后面的演示(demo)课提供了一个很好的支撑。由于大赛的授课时间有限,潘老师突出重点,在演示课上只展示教学方案的第三步,即participatory learning 1 和 post assessment 1。她采用BOPPPS(bridge in, objectives, pre-assessment, participatory learning, post assessment, summary)模型,通过德国大众汽车减排作假、中国支付宝公益植树项目等案例,教学目标涵盖商务英语知识、技能、以及相关的伦理和价值观等。在短短的十几分钟里要达到这么多项教学目标绝非易事。潘老师通过一系列的短视频、多种教学方法(如听力填空、案例讨论、汉译英、样本对话补正等)以及活泼的师生互动,较好地实现了教学目标,显示出选手突出的课堂组织能力。商务英语教学起源于英美等国,因此基本使用本国素材、讲本国故事。传入中国后,主要使用外国素材、讲外国故事。令人欣喜的是,潘老师注意突出中国特色,多次引用中国案例,讲授中国故事,传播中国价值观。加上她出色的英语基本功和良好的师生互动,使得教学过程十分流畅,也没有不同文化同场展示的违和感。总而言之,潘紫萌老师在授课环节的各方面表现都很优秀。不足之处当然也有。首先, 8’13’’开始的讨论过于仓促,只有18秒, 8’31’’就结束了。由于讨论不充分,在随后的问答环节中,更多的回答似乎来自老师而不是学生。第二个是要增加教学过程的自然自发 (spontaneity)。不知是因为课前多次排练还是老师特意要求,学生的产出只有一次对话(17’40’’)相对自然,其他的多次回答虽准确无误,但都像中国小学生朗读课文或回答问题,语音、语调、语速都过于整齐合一,这不利于培养学生的英语实际表达能力。点评专家:陈准民

第12届教学大赛商务英语组特等奖潘紫萌说课

说课点评:在30分钟的准备时间里,读完、理解一篇800多词的商务英语文章,记住文章的结构和要点,设计出一套有理论指导、教学理念清晰、目标合理、结构完整、方法得当,最好再带点创新的教学方案,然后在10分钟的时间里,用英语条理清晰地把它展示出来,这对任何商务英语教师来讲都是一项重大的挑战。潘紫萌老师首先分析了课文,根据内容将其解构成三大部分。选手将第二部分(第3-8段)归纳成 promotion, price and place 和将第三部分(第9段)归纳成对计划进入中国市场的外国企业的忠告,这都是正确的。但是,她把第一部分(第1-2段)归纳成product,进而把前两部分归纳成营销学中著名的4P战略,这种做法有待商榷。因为课文的第1段主要讲两个问题:1)营销战略如何在中国成功,2)这些战略如何根据中国人的喜好以及对产品或服务的认知进行调整,而不是具体的产品。也许是准备的时间非常紧迫,选手对课文的理解和归纳出现了偏差。然后,潘老师分析了学生的特点。在教学模式上,她采取以学生为中心、以产出为导向的教学模式。其教学目标包括商务英语知识、商务技能和伦理价值。在具体的教学方法上,她例举了基于任务的教学、基于讨论的教学、案例教学、学生参与的测评等,并强调要综合利用线上线下教学资源。在学习测评上,她采用师生共同参与的方式,以增强教学效果。至于具体的教学步骤,她采用BOPPPS模式,再加课后作业。以上教学方案应该说中规中矩,显示出潘老师对商务英语教学的理论、模式、方法和测评等各要素有比较全面的了解。潘老师最亮眼的表现是在10分钟的时间里,用流利的英语将其教学方案展现出来,而且条理清晰,相关的教学理论、教学方法、商务知识、商务案例均了然于胸,信手拈来,同时口到手到,同步将所讲内容写到白板上,手起笔落,一气呵成。在提问阶段,潘老师的表现依旧出色,理解到位,回答中肯,表现出较高的英语基本功和商务、人文素养。不过有的回答可以再精炼一些。比如在回答第一个问题时,把EGP,EOP,EAP,ESP 的定义都讲了一遍,有点啰嗦。总而言之,潘紫萌在说课中表现突出,是一位素质比较全面、经验比较丰富的优秀商务英语教师。点评专家:陈准民

教育培训更多

AI时代外国文学研究方法与学术创新系列研修课程(第一期)

03.研修日程时间:2026年7月28日至7月29日形式:线上研修(腾讯会议)*研修须知等相关文件将于报名后一周内发送至邮箱,请注意查收。最终日程以开班前发放的研修手册为准。第一天(7月28日)08:30—08:40 开班式08:40—10:10 虞建华(上海外国语大学)10:20—11:50 查明建(上海外国语大学)14:00—15:30 李锋(中国海洋大学)15:40—17:10 陈广兴(上海外国语大学)第二天(7月29日)08:40—10:10 杨金才(南京大学)10:20—11:50 张和龙(上海外国语大学)14:00—15:30 尚必武(上海交通大学)15:40—17:10 张曼(上海外国语大学)04.主讲专家(以姓氏拼音为序)陈广兴:文学博士,上海外国语大学文学研究院研究员、博士生导师,《英美文学研究论丛》编辑部主任,美国科罗拉多大学英语学院访问学者。主要研究方向为文学理论、美国当代小说、西方马克思主义等。在《外国文学研究》《外国文学评论》《当代外国文学》《中国比较文学》等期刊及报纸上发表论文近50篇,出版专著2部、译著8部,主持和参与国家级、省部级项目多项。李锋:中国海洋大学外国语学院教授、博士生导师、博士后合作导师,《中国外语研究》副主编,郑州大学英美文学研究中心兼职研究员,曾任职于上海财经大学外国语学院(副院长、校研究生教指委委员),哥伦比亚大学英语系(富布赖特研究学者),上海外国语大学(教授、博士生导师、校科研与学术伦理委员会委员)。李锋教授重点关注英美或然历史小说、穿越小说、犹太大屠杀叙事等,共主持国家社科基金项目3项,出版《20世纪美国文学中的经济背景与商业文化》《不曾发生的历史:当代美国或然历史小说研究》等专著和《后现代主义诗学》《巨匠与杰作》等译著。尚必武:上海交通大学特聘教授,教育部“重大人才工程计划”特聘教授,欧洲科学院外籍院士,博士生导师,外国语学院院长, Frontiers of Narrative Studies (ESCI)主编,English Studies (A&HCI) 副主编, Narrative Studies across Humanities (Springer)丛书主编,Arcadia (A&HCI), InterdisciplinaryStudies of Literature (A&HCI), Kritika Kultura (A&HCI),《外国文学研究》《中国比较文学》《当代外语研究》等国内外期刊编委,国家社科基金重大项目首席专家。主要从事英美文学、叙事学、文学伦理学批评等领域的研究,出版专著四部,在《文学评论》《外国文学研究》《文艺理论研究》、Philosophy and Literature, Journal of Narrative Theory, Critique:Studies in Contemporary Fiction等刊物发表A&HCI、CSSCI论文百余篇,研究成果先后荣获教育部高等学校人文社科优秀科研成果奖二等奖、三等奖、上海市哲学社会科学优秀成果奖一等奖、二等奖等。杨金才:南京大学教授、博士生导师,《当代外国文学》主编,国家级人才项目特聘教授。先后主持国家社科基金重大项目、重点项目、一般项目、教育部人文社科规划项目等多项,在国内外学术刊物发表论文200余篇,出版专著5部,教育部国家级规划教材4部,编、译著14部和其他教材多部。曾获中国高校人文社会科学研究优秀成果二等奖、江苏省哲学社会科学优秀成果一等奖、国家级教学成果一等奖和二等奖、宝钢优秀教师奖等。主要兼职包括国务院学科评议组成员、全国美国文学研究会会长、中国外国文学学会副会长、中美比较文化研究分会副会长、英语文学研究分会副会长、江苏省外国文学学会会长等。虞建华:上海外国语大学教授,博士生导师。曾任上海外国语大学英语二系主任、法学院院长、语言文学研究所所长及文学研究院院长,曾任全国高校外语专业教学指导委员会委员、中国外国文学学会英语文学研究分会会长、中国英汉比较研究会副会长、全国美国文学研究会常务理事、上海市突出贡献专家协会常务理事、上海作家协会会员、上海翻译家协会会员、国内核心刊物《英美文学研究论丛》创刊主编、名誉主编及《外国语》《译林》《中南大学学报》《外语与翻译》《英语研究》等杂志的编委。曾担任上海外语教育出版社西方文论丛书编委、博学文库编委。主持国家社科重点项目“美国历史‘非常’事件的小说再现和意识形态批判”、国家社科后期资助项目“美国文学大辞典”和省部级项目5项,其中《美国文学大辞典》获教育部哲学社会科学优秀成果一等奖;参与国家社科重大项目2项成果的撰写。查明建:博士,教授,博士生导师,美国哈佛大学富布莱特高级研究学者,曾任上海外国语大学科研处副处长、文学研究院副院长、英语学院院长、研究生部主任、副校长等。主要研究方向为比较文学理论、翻译文学研究、中外文学关系研究。著作有《中国现代翻译文学史(1898-1949)》(合著)、《中国20世纪外国文学翻译史(1898—2000》(上、下卷)(合著)、《一苇杭之:查明建教授讲比较文学与翻译研究》等,译著有《比较文学批评导论》《什么是世界文学》《非洲短篇小说选集》等。张和龙:上海外国语大学文学研究院教授,博士生导师/博士后导师,英美文学研究中心主任,《英美文学研究论丛》执行主编,英国文学学会副会长,上海市外国文学学会秘书长、常务理事,上海翻译家协会理事,中美比较文化研究会理事。曾任上外法学院副院长、法学院副院长(主持工作)、文学研究院副院长等职。2002-2003年英国剑桥大学英文系访问学者,2010-2011年美国耶鲁大学英文系富布赖特访问学者。2007年获教育部直属院校宝钢优秀教师奖。张曼:上海外国语大学教授、文学博士,《中国比较文学》杂志编审。美国德州大学、哈佛大学高级访问学者。主要研究方向为翻译文学、中外文学关系、比较文学理论。出版专著:《老舍中外文学关系研究》《老舍翻译与其作品英译研究》《中国俄罗斯文学研究史论》(合著)、《新中国外国文学研究60年》(合著)、《国外汉学史》(合著);译著《非洲短篇小说选》。

AI赋能国际期刊论文写作、修改与发表

课程内容本期研修在论文写作全流程课程模块基础上,嵌入AI实操模块,实现经典学术研究范式与AI技术深度融合,核心课程内容包括但不限于:1. AI赋能选题挖掘与前沿研究趋势研判:借助智能文献工具快速追踪学科前沿与领域热点,识别研究缺口,凝练兼具创新性与可行性的研究选题。2. 论文标题、摘要、引言优化与案例修改:打磨英文标题交际功能,搭建引言标准语步框架,智能润色英文表述,解决开篇引领力不足、逻辑断层等常见问题。3. 文献综述智能检索、整合与分析:定位、分类、梳理中英文文献,AI协助梳理研究脉络及学科发展趋势。4. 研究方法、实证结果 AI 辅助撰写与可视化:AI辅助完善研究设计、规范统计表述,生成规范图表,标准化汇报信度、效度、效应量,保障研究可复制性。5. 讨论与结语深度阐释:AI辅助对比文献、挖掘创新价值,对标同类国际研究,强化研究理论贡献与现实启示,规范撰写研究局限与未来展望。6. AI辅助审稿意见回应策略与实操演练:分层梳理不同类型评审意见,借助AI梳理修改逻辑,构建科学、完整、分层回应的返修回复范式。7. 双视角投稿全流程实操:编辑视角规范+作者视角科研成长路径:结合资深学者多年国际发表经验,分享外语学者投稿难点、长期科研成果产出规划。8. 搭建对话流型AI智能体:个性化智能体辅助科研工作全流程,为论文写作与发表赋能增效。课程目标1. 树立 “本土研究+国际表达”的写作思维立足中国外语课堂教学现实提炼创新研究问题,产出符合国际期刊评审标准、具备学术影响力的实证研究成果;2. 强化科研伦理意识厘清生成式AI在外语论文全流程的合规使用边界、学术伦理规范与期刊披露要求,掌握安全、规范的AI科研辅助方法;3. 提升学术写作能力掌握国际期刊论文全链路写作逻辑,从前沿选题挖掘、文献智能梳理、题目与引言打磨,到研究方法、结果、讨论、结语规范撰写,实现各模块写作质量有效提升;4. 优化投稿发表策略精准识别期刊桌拒、外审返修核心原因,学会借助AI辅助梳理审稿意见、分层撰写得体详实的回复信,提升返修录用率;5. 掌握AI技术应用建立适配外语学科的AI科研工作流,熟练运用专业学术大模型完成文献检索、语料分析、英文润色、图表制作、参考文献自动规范等实践工作。专家介绍(按姓氏拼音排序)金檀,教授、博士生导师,华南师范大学国际文化学院院长、儿童青少年阅读与发展教育部哲学社会科学实验室专家,主要研究领域为语料库语言学、语言测试与评估、语言智能教学。在人才培养方面,主持开发“语言、数据与研究”数字课程、“学术前沿与文献导读”案例微课及“英语科研写作与学术交流”AI课程,主编或撰写《外语教学智慧科研方法入门》《语料库辅助英语教学入门》《英语测试与评价》等教材,获国家级教学成果奖两项;在科学研究方面,主持国家社科、教育部人文社科、广东省社科等项目,出版《第二语言口语表现评分研究》《英语口语例据使用特点及发展研究》《数智化国际中文教学入门》等著作,主持《外语界》、Computer Assisted Language Learning、Journalof English for Academic Purposes(JEAP)等期刊专栏,研究成果获邀Language Testing主编专访并入选TESOL Quarterly年度高下载论文及Modern Language Journal年度高被引论文;在社会服务方面,担任Language Testing in Asia副主编及Innovationin Language Learning and Teaching、JEAP等期刊编委,创建“一针三库智能教研平台”(LanguageData.net),自主研发的“文本分级指难针”已被国内外一万四千余所机构(含国内95%“双一流”建设高校)的同行广泛采用。雷蕾,上海外国语大学教授、博士生导师。研究兴趣涉及基于语料库和计量方法的现代汉语、古代汉语、英语的词汇/句法描写及历时研究、学习者语言研究、语言数字人文研究等领域。在剑桥大学出版社等出版专著5部,在《应用语言学》《第二语言写作杂志》《学术英语期刊》《国际语料库语言学期刊》《语料库语言学与语言理论》等SSCI期刊发表研究性论文60余篇、书评10余篇,其中两篇论文入选ESI高被引论文;在CSSCI期刊发表论文或书评10余篇。主持国家社科基金项目2项。兼任《学术英语期刊》(SSCI)等国内外期刊编委、跨人文领域语料库研究(德古瑞特)副主编。入选爱思唯尔中国高被引学者、全球前2%顶尖科学家。任伟,北京航空航天大学外国语学院教授、博士生导师、博士后合作导师、副院长。主要研究领域为二语语用,研究兴趣涵盖语用学、二语习得等。担任中国逻辑学会语用学专业委员会副会长、国际商务与语言服务工作委员会副会长、二语习得研究专业委员会常务理事、语言教育与国际传播专业委员会常务理事、中国语文现代化学会语言治理研究分会常务理事等。已主持国家社会科学基金2项、教育部人文社会科学重点研究基地重大项目等省部级项目多项。荣获第九届高等学校人文社会科学研究优秀成果奖;连续入选2020-2025爱思唯尔“中国高被引学者”,2022-2025年全球前2%顶尖科学家,中国知网高被引学者Top1%。在AppliedLinguistics, Journal of Pragmatics等国内外权威学术期刊发表论文140余篇,在SSCI期刊编纂专刊4期。专著SecondLanguage Pragmatics由剑桥大学出版社出版。担任InterculturalPragmatics (SSCI)期刊副主编,EastAsian Pragmatics评论主编,Discourse, Context &Media、International Journal of Bilingual Education andBilingualism、Journal of Multilingual and MulticulturalDevelopment、Journal of Pragmatics、Language Teaching Research、System等多家国内外语言学及语言教学SSCI期刊编委。苏杭,伯明翰大学博士,北京航空航天大学博士后,现为上海外国语大学语言科学研究院教授、博士生导师。研究兴趣包括语料库语言学、系统功能语言学、语用学、学术英语等;主持完成国家社科基金、中国博士后基金等科研项目三项,出版著作两部,在Applied Linguistics、《外语教学与研究》等期刊发表论文50余篇。学术兼职包括中国英汉语比较研究会功能语言学专业委员会常务理事、中国英汉语比较研究会语料库语言学专业委员会理事、Journal of English for Academic Purposes编委等。曾入选“重庆英才•青年拔尖人才”支持计划、第四批重庆市学术技术带头人后备人选,获得重庆市社会科学优秀成果奖二等奖(2024)、高等教育(研究生)国家级教学成果奖二等奖(2023)以及重庆市高等教育教学成果奖三等奖(2022)等奖项。苏友,博士,北京邮电大学人文学院教授,国际期刊Journal of Computers in Education副主编。研究兴趣包括语言智能教学、二语同伴互动、外语教师教育等。主持国家社科基金一般项目、教育部人文社科青年项目等课题。以第一作者/通讯作者在Computer Assisted Language Learning、Journal of Second Language Writing、System、Journal of English for Academic Purposes、Teachingand Teacher Education、Higher Education、《中国外语教育(现外语教育研究前沿)》《现代教育技术》等SSCI/CSSCI刊物发表多篇论文。获北京市高等教育教学成果一等奖、北邮青年教师教学观摩比赛一等奖等荣誉。杨港,博士、博士后,山东大学外国语学院副教授、硕士生导师。研究方向为外语教学理论与实践,学术兴趣包括 AI 赋能的外语教学设计与评价、外语学习者认知与心理、外语教师发展等;主持国家社科基金一般项目、教育部人文社科研究青年基金项目、中国博士后科学基金面上资助项目、山东省本科教学改革研究项目等课题各1项、山东省社科规划研究项目2项;出版专著2部;主编教材5套14部,其中国家级规划教材6部;发表论文20余篇,其中 16篇收录于CSSCI来源期刊(如《外语界》《外语与外语教学》《外语电化教学》)、SSCI一区期刊(如System, Education and Information Technologies, InternationalJournal of Multilingualism);获评山东省高等教育教学成果二等奖、山东省社会科学优秀成果三等奖和山东省普通高等教育一流教材以及“宝钢教育奖励基金”和“邵一兵教育奖励基金”。主要学术兼职包括:国家社科基金项目成果鉴定专家(获全国哲学社会科学工作办公室颁发的“认真负责的鉴定专家”荣誉称号)、多家CSSCI来源期刊以及SSCI期刊审稿专家等。

AI赋能多模态外语教学设计与实施

研修分为两大课程模块,分别由香港理工大学冯德正教授与香港大学蒋联江教授领衔主讲,主要内容如下:(一)AI赋能的多模态外语教学设计(冯德正教授团队)本模块聚焦基于元读写教学法与“师-生-机”生态模型的多模态外语教学设计。将系统讲解如何在多元读写教学法框架内使用AI工具,引导教师搭建多模态“元语言”教学脚手架,展示基于智能体的教学实践与翻转课堂设计,并最终将课堂创新转化为教学学术(SoTL)研究成果。课程内容将涵盖以下六个专题:专题一:AI时代高校外语教学的挑战与出路专题二:AI赋能的多元读写教学法与多模态教学设计专题三:多模态意义设计的“元语言”与提示词设计专题四: 基于 AI 智能体的多模态“师-生 -机”交互式教学设计专题五: AI时代的外语翻转课堂设计专题六: AI赋能的多模态外语教学研究(SoTL)与论文写作(二)智能外语教育中的多模态评估与新读写活动设计(蒋联江教授团队)本模块整合视觉语法和超位语法,提出多模态提示词写作框架,旨在帮助外语教师有效引导学生的数字化多模态文本产出,并基于此设计个性化的多模态评估任务,推进自身专业发展,促成智能外语教育。课程内容将涵盖以下六个专题:专题一:多模态评估任务:概念与设计框架专题二:多模态评估任务:实施与评价方案专题三:多模态生成式人工智能与新读写空间专题四:基于视觉语法的多模态提示词写作框架专题五:从文生图到图生视频的超位语法专题六:生成式人工智能与数字化多模态文本设计专家介绍(按姓氏拼音排序)冯德正,新加坡国立大学博士,现为香港理工大学人文学院副院长、英文及传意学系教授、博士生导师,主要研究方向为多模态语篇分析、传播与交际研究、语言教学等,近期研究主要关注多模态中国话语及其国际传播。近年来在Studies in Higher Education, System, Journal of Pragmatics, Teacherand Teaching Education, Discourse and Communication, Pragmatics, VisualCommunication等国际(SSCI/A&HCI)期刊与《外国语》,《当代语言学》,《现代外语》,《外语界》,《中国外语》,《外语教学》等国内期刊发表论文100余篇,主持或参与10余项国家、教育部、香港政府及香港理工大学项目。担任SSCI一区期刊Journal of English for Academic Purposes书评主编、编委, Multimodality and Society等国际期刊编委。蒋联江,香港大学教育学院副教授、博士生导师。主要研究方向为计算机辅助多模态写作、数字素养与二语教师教育,成果发表于TESOL Quarterly、Journal of SecondLanguage Writing 等国际权威期刊,主持多项中国香港特别行政区研究项目,兼任多本SSCI期刊编委或编辑,学术成果丰硕。在语言教育领域具有广泛影响力,荣获多项荣誉与奖项,如2025年、2026年连续入选ESI高被引论文奖;2024年、2025年入选科睿唯安(Clarivate Analytics)公布的香港大学顶尖1%学者榜单;2023年、2024年、2025年连续三年入选斯坦福大学发布的全球前2%顶尖科学家榜单;2022年荣获澳门人文社会科学研究优秀成果奖。翁素贤,广州大学外国语学院英语师范教研室主任,硕士生导师。主讲《信息技术与英语教学》等课程,主持多项科研教研课题,连续两年获中国外语微课大赛国家级三等奖、广东省一等奖,在广州市教育信息化创新应用评奖活动中获评微课类一、二、三等奖,在2022年全国师生信息素养提升实践活动中获评高等教育组微课“创新作品”。指导学生参加各类信息技术相关比赛获奖,如全国师范生微课大赛特等奖、中国好创意暨全国数字艺术设计大赛国赛二等奖、未来设计师全国高校数字艺术设计大赛广东赛区三等奖、“高教社杯”大学生“用外语讲好中国故事”优秀短视频全国特等奖及一等奖。深耕信息技术与英语学科融合,为广东省内外大中小学英语教师策划实施多场信息技术培训。

特色工具

系统产品

重点教材