新闻听力 | 每天步行多少步能防止发胖?

每天步行多少步能防止发胖?How many daily steps can help keep weight off?常速 | 五级(偏难) | 443词 | 2min59s刘立军供稿Part I. QUESTIONSListen to the passage and choose the best answer to each question you hear.Q1. What daily step goal does the study suggest may help people maintain weight loss?A. Around 6,000 steps each day.B. Around 7,000 steps each day.C. Around 8,500 steps each day.D. Around 10,000 steps each day.Q2. What kind of data did the researchers analyze in the study?A. Medical records from several health institutions.B. Data collected from eighteen earlier studies.C. Survey responses from daily fitness users.D. Interviews with doctors at obesity clinics.Q3. According to the study, what did researchers discover about walking during weight loss programs?A. It immediately improved participants’ overall health.B. It replaced the need for diet changes.C. It helped people lose weight much faster.D. It showed limited effect on additional weight loss.Q4. What can be inferred about the role of physical activity in weight management?A. It works best when combined with medical treatment.B. It is more helpful for keeping weight off long term.C. It is mainly useful for people with severe obesity.D. It is more effective than diet control at first.Q5. What does Dr. Tara Narula mainly suggest about the study findings?A. They should be considered a useful but preliminary result.B. They should guide people to exercise exactly 8,500 steps.C. They should replace traditional weight loss advice.D. They should be applied to every adult immediately.Part II. TRANSCRIPTHow many daily steps can help keep weight off?(Q1) A new study suggests that increasing daily step counts may help people maintain weight loss in the long term, and a goal to shoot for may be around 8,500 steps a day.(Q2) The research, published in the International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health and presented last week at the European Obesity Conference, analyzed data from 18 previous studies looking at weight loss and physical activity.(Q3) Researchers found that walking more was not strongly linked to losing additional weight during active weight loss programs. However, people who continued taking more steps each day were more likely to keep the weight off over time.Over an average follow-up period of about 1.5 years, researchers found participants maintained roughly 1% of weight loss for every additional 1,000 steps they walked daily, with the average participant starting at about 7,400 steps per day at baseline.The study noted that an average of 8,500 daily steps appeared to help participants maintain weight loss the longest, though researchers stressed that it is not a strict target or prescription for everyone.prescription n. 处方;建议;规定The increased activity happened as part of structured lifestyle programs that also included diet changes and behavioral counseling.“This was a lifestyle modification program, and it really is a multifactorial approach when it comes to weight loss. So these individuals got diet and behavioral counseling in addition to really moving more. And so you really need all of that,” ABC News medical contributor Dr. Tara Narula said on “Good Morning America” Monday.multifactorial adj. 多因素的;由多种因素造成的(Q5) Narula noted that researchers described the findings as “hypothesis-generating” and said more research is needed.“The researchers say, look, this is really hypothesis-generating; it should push us to do more research,” she explained. “It is not a prescription that everyone should go out and now do 8,500 steps. But it is helpful information.”(Q4) Researchers concluded that calorie restriction was likely more impactful during the weight loss phase, while higher levels of physical activity were more closely tied to long-term weight loss maintenance.The study also had several limitations. The analysis only included adults who were overweight or obese and relied on pooled population data, meaning the findings show correlation rather than direct cause and effect.correlation n. 相互关系;关联“Certainly if you’re planning to do a weight loss program, talk to your doctor about what is right for you in terms of your movement and goals overall,” Narula said. “And healthy habits build on each other. The more you lose weight, the more you want to exercise, and you feel better. But it really is helpful to know that just that little bit of increase might be all you need.”Part III. KEYQ1.C.【解析】细节题。题目出处为:“A new study suggests that increasing daily step counts may help people maintain weight loss in the long term, and a goal to shoot for may be around 8,500 steps a day.” 意为:“一项新的研究表明,增加每日步数或许有助于长期保持减重效果,建议将每日步数目标设置为每天8500步左右。”该句直接给出了研究所建议的步数目标,因此正确答案为C。Q2.B.【解析】细节题。题目出处为:“The research, published in the International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health and presented last week at the European Obesity Conference, analyzed data from 18 previous studies looking at weight loss and physical activity.” 意为:“这项研究发表在《国际环境研究与公共健康期刊》上,并于上周在欧洲肥胖大会上做了报告。研究分析了此前18项探讨减重和身体活动关系的相关数据。”该句明确说明研究的数据来源,因此正确答案为B。Q3.D.【解析】细节题。题目出处为:“Researchers found that walking more was not strongly linked to losing additional weight during active weight loss programs.” 意为:“研究人员发现,在减重计划进行阶段,多走路与进一步减轻体重之间并没有很强的联系。”由此可知,在减重过程中增加步数并不会显著带来额外的减重效果,因此正确答案为D。Q4.B.【解析】推理题。题目出处为:“Researchers concluded that calorie restriction was likely more impactful during the weight loss phase, while higher levels of physical activity were more closely tied to long-term weight loss maintenance.” 意为:“研究人员得出结论,在减重阶段限制热量摄入的作用可能更为显著,而更高强度的运动则与长期维持减重成果关系更为密切。”由此可以推断,运动对于维持长期减重更为有效,因此正确答案为B。Q5.A.【解析】观点题。题目出处为:“Narula noted that researchers described the findings as ‘hypothesis generating’ and said more research is needed.” 意为:“纳鲁拉指出,研究人员将这些发现定性为‘生成假说’性质,并强调仍需要进一步研究。” 该句表明研究结果具有一定参考价值,但仍属于初步发现,需要进一步研究验证,因此正确答案为A。(本文图片来源于摄图网,版权归摄图网所有)

猫薄荷为何让猫“疯狂”?

猫薄荷为何让猫“疯狂”?Why Does Catnip Make Cats Go Crazy?文本难度:考研刘立军供稿Of the many bewildering behaviors cats display, one of the strangest is their obsession with a specific species of plant. After just one whiff, even the most stoic cat can start pawing, drooling, biting, and wriggling in a state of pure feline euphoria. So, why do cats go crazy for catnip? This is the question cat behavior expert Masao Miyazaki and chemist Toshio Nishikawa set out to answer in 2013. Along with their research teams from Iwate and Nagoya University, they began by studying silvervine – a plant that sparks a similar response to catnip.猫咪有着许多令人费解的行为,其中最奇特的莫过于对某一特定植物的痴迷。即便是最冷静自持的猫,哪怕只是闻上一口,也会瞬间陷入抓挠、流口水、啃咬、翻滚的状态,沉浸在纯粹的猫咪欢愉中。那么,猫咪究竟为什么会为猫薄荷神魂颠倒?2013年,猫咪行为学家宫崎正夫与化学家西川俊夫便带着这一问题展开了研究。他们与来自岩手大学与名古屋大学的研究团队携手,先从木天蓼这种植物入手——这是一种同样能在猫身上引发和猫薄荷相似反应的植物。First, the researchers painstakingly extracted chemical compounds from the plant and dribbled various combinations of them onto filter paper. Then they brought in some cats and studied which compounds they were drawn to. Overwhelmingly, their feline testers pounced on the papers containing nepetalactol. And when Miyazaki and his student Reiko Uenoyama ran blood tests on the cats who’d interacted with nepetalactol, they found their systems were flooded with endorphins. These hormones block pain signals, relieve stress, and generally create a happy, calming effect. And catnip triggers the same endorphin rush with a similar chemical called nepetalactone, and it’s this flood of happy hormones that gives catnip and silvervine their signature drug-like response.研究人员先是费尽心力,从木天蓼中提取各类化合物,再把不同配比的提取物滴在滤纸上。随后,他们找来猫咪,观察哪些化学成分会吸引它们。结果显而易见,绝大多数受试猫咪都径直扑向含有荆芥内酯醇(nepetalactol)的滤纸。宫崎正夫和他的学生上野山怜子对接触过荆芥内酯醇的猫咪进行血液检测,发现它们体内会大量分泌内啡肽。这类激素能够阻断痛觉信号、缓解压力,带来愉悦、镇定的感受。而猫薄荷则是借助一种结构相近的物质——荆芥内酯,同样能刺激猫体内大量释放内啡肽。正是这种快乐激素的迸发,让猫薄荷和木天蓼产生了标志性的、类似药物带来的反应。These compounds don’t just trigger this effect in small cats. When the researchers brought nepetalactol-treated filter paper to a few zoos, leopards, lynxes, and jaguars all dove face-first into the compound. This was big news. If these different cat species reacted to nepetalactol the same way, the response was likely a shared evolutionary trait, potentially something important to cat survival that stretched back millions of years. When the silvervine researchers presented their work at a conference, one evolutionary biologist raised a compelling theory. In chemical terms, both nepetalactol and nepetalactone are classified as iridoids – a type of natural compound known to contain insect-repelling properties. So perhaps cats rubbing their faces in silvervine and catnip were applying an ancient form of bug spray.这类化合物并非只对小型猫科动物生效。当研究人员把滴有荆芥内酯醇的滤纸带到几家动物园时,豹子、猞猁和美洲豹全都一头埋上去嗅闻。这是一项重大发现。既然这么多不同种类的猫科动物都对荆芥内酯醇产生相同反应,说明该行为极有可能是共有的进化特征,或许关乎猫科动物生存的重要本能,其根源可追溯至数百万年前。当木天蓼研究团队在学术会议上展示成果时,一位进化生物学家提出了一个极具说服力的假说:从化学分类来看,荆芥内酯醇与荆芥内酯都属于环烯醚萜类化合物,这类天然物质具备驱虫特性。所以,猫咪把脸在木天蓼和猫薄荷上蹭来蹭去的行为,或许正是在涂抹一种古老的驱虫剂。To test this, researchers set up cages of mosquitoes that cats could stick their heads into. And sure enough, the cats that had been treated with nepetalactol got fewer mosquito bites than the cats in the control group. The same effect was true for the scientists who’d volunteered their arms in solidarity with their feline subjects. These mosquito-repelling properties are currently our best explanation for why cats love silvervine and catnip. But researchers still had one more question: in their state of euphoria, cats tend to vigorously bite, lick, and rub against these plants. But do cats really need to go this crazy to get their bug-repelling effects?为验证这一猜想,研究人员搭建了放有蚊子的笼子,猫咪可以把头伸进笼内。结果证实,体表接触过荆芥内酯醇的猫咪,被蚊子叮咬的次数少于对照组。就连主动挽起袖子、甘愿和猫咪一同参与实验的科研人员,手臂上的叮咬次数也同样大幅减少。目前,这种驱蚊特性是我们解释猫咪喜爱木天蓼与猫薄荷最合理的假说。但研究者还有一个疑问:当猫咪在亢奋状态下,往往会使劲啃咬、舔舐并用力蹭擦这类植物。可它们真的需要表现得如此“上头”,才能真正发挥驱虫功效吗?To investigate rubbing, they provided cats with filter papers treated with microscopic amounts of nepetalactol. And sure enough, even these tiny doses made the papers irresistible, suggesting that microscopic amounts of bug repellent can be transferred by rubbing alone. As for biting and licking, the researchers found that when cats damage the plant, the leaves actually produce more mosquito-repellent chemicals. So your cat isn’t just ripping open their bags of catnip to be annoying; their evolutionary instincts are just trying to get even more of that bug protection.为研究摩擦行为,研究人员向猫咪提供了只沾有微量荆芥内酯醇的滤纸。不出所料,即便剂量微乎其微,这些滤纸依旧对猫咪有着极强吸引力。这说明,仅靠蹭一蹭,就能沾上微量的驱虫物质。至于啃咬和舔舐,研究人员发现,当猫咪啃破植物组织时,叶片反而会生成更多驱蚊化学成分。所以,你的猫咪扒开猫薄荷袋子并不是故意捣乱,而是在进化本能驱使下,想要获取更多驱虫保护。Cats are far from the only animal to use natural plants for purposes like this. Apes swallow scratchy and hairy leaves to dislodge parasites from their guts. Sheep munch on tannin-rich plants to kill intestinal worms, and monarch butterflies use toxic milkweed to kill parasites that normally impair their flight. Just like cats’ ability to find mosquito repellent, these behaviors can help humans identify useful plants and ingredients in the natural world. So, the next time you see your feline friend on a catnip binge, don’t worry – it’s only medicinal.并非只有猫咪会利用天然植物达成这类目的。猿类会直接吞下粗糙多毛的叶片,借此刮擦并排出肠道寄生虫;绵羊会食用富含单宁的植物来杀灭肠道蠕虫;帝王蝶则会采食有毒的马利筋,清除会削弱自身飞行能力的体内寄生虫。和猫咪寻找天然驱蚊植物的本能一样,这类动物行为,也能帮助人类发掘自然界里有价值的植物与成分。所以,下次看到你的猫主子沉迷猫薄荷,不必担心——这只是它在“用药”而已。【词汇】1.stoic adj. 坚忍的;沉着的2.whiff n. 一闻;一股气味3.drool v. 流口水4.wriggle v. 扭动;蠕动5.feline adj. 猫科的;猫的6.euphoria n. 欣快;极度愉悦7.catnip n. 猫薄荷8.painstaking adj. 煞费苦心的;极其仔细的9.dribble v. 使滴下;滴落10.pounce v. 猛扑;突然袭击11.endorphin n. 内啡肽12.lynx n. 猞猁13.jaguar n. 美洲豹14.dislodge v. 驱逐;移开15.munch v. 大声咀嚼16.intestinal adj. 肠的17.milkweed n. 马利筋(一种植物)18.binge n. 狂欢;放纵行为 (本文图片来源于摄图网,版权归摄图网所有)

新闻听力 | 炎热天气让人变得迟钝

炎热天气让人变得迟钝Heat Might Cloud Your Brain常速 | 六级(易) | 526词 | 3min31s刘立军供稿Part I. QUESTIONSListen to the passage and choose the best answer to each question you hear.Q1. What is one way extreme heat can affect people, according to the passage?A. It can increase the speed at which people complete tasks.B. It can improve people’s ability to solve difficult problems.C. It can help people remember information more easily.D. It can make it harder to think and make good decisions.Q2. What did the Boston study find about students without air conditioning?A. They were more comfortable while studying.B. They performed less well on the tests.C. They were better at solving numerical problems.D. They completed both tests in less time.Q3. Why does the speaker mention the limitations of the Boston study?A. To show that its findings should be interpreted with some caution.B. To suggest that the researchers used the wrong testing methods.C. To explain why high temperatures affect only university students.D. To prove that air conditioning has little effect on learning.Q4. What did the large study in China suggest about long-term exposure to extreme heat?A. It has little effect unless people suffer heat stroke.B. It mainly affects people’s physical strength.C. It may be linked to a decline in cognitive ability.D. It can improve memory after repeated exposure.Q5. What does the speaker suggest people do when they have to make an important decision on a very hot day?A. Avoid asking others for advice about the decision.B. Make the decision quickly before becoming tired.C. Trust their first reaction rather than overthink it.D. Cool down first and consider the decision carefully.Part II. TRANSCRIPTHow Heat Waves Affect Your BrainHeat waves are becoming more common in many parts of the world. Most people know that extreme heat can cause health problems, such as heart and breathing difficulties. In serious cases, it can even lead to heat stroke or death. But there is another effect of extreme heat that we may not think about: it can affect the way our brains work.When the temperature gets too high, our bodies try to keep us cool. More blood and energy are sent to parts of the body that help control our temperature. As a result, the brain may receive less blood than usual. Scientists are still studying exactly how this process affects the brain. (Q1) However, research has already shown that high temperatures can make it harder for people to pay attention, remember information, solve problems, and make good decisions.One interesting study was carried out during a heat wave in Boston in 2016. Researchers studied university students living in different buildings. Some students had air conditioning, while others did not. The students with air conditioning stayed in rooms with an average temperature of about 21°C. The rooms without air conditioning were much warmer, with an average temperature of about 26°C.For 12 days, the students completed two simple tests each day. One test involved adding and subtracting numbers. The other was a test of attention. (Q2) The results were clear: students in the warmer rooms performed worse. They answered fewer questions correctly and took longer to complete the attention test.(Q3) Of course, one study cannot tell us everything. The number of students was relatively small, and they were all university students. However, other studies have found similar results. When people are exposed to high temperatures, they often have more difficulty paying attention and remembering information. They may also be slower at solving problems and making decisions.There is also evidence that long-term exposure to extreme heat may affect our brains. In one large study, researchers followed more than 53,000 people in China for eight years. (Q4) They found that people who experienced more very hot days tended to perform worse on tests of memory and mathematical ability. The researchers estimated that if the number of extremely hot days increases in the future, average human cognitive ability could decline.The effects of heat are not the same for everyone. Older people, for example, may be more strongly affected. People with certain physical conditions may also face greater risks. In addition, even a short period of extreme heat may affect our thinking for some time afterward.So what should we do? The simplest advice is to avoid making important decisions when we are extremely hot. If possible, wait until you are in a cooler environment. (Q5-1) When a decision cannot be delayed, take your time, check your reasoning carefully, and ask someone else for advice.We often use the expression “in the heat of the moment” to describe a decision made without enough thought. As heat waves become more common, the expression may have a more literal meaning than we realize. (Q5-2) When the weather is extremely hot, cooling your body may be a good way to help your brain work better, too.Part III. KEYQ1. D.【解析】理解题。题目出处为:“However, research has already shown that high temperatures can make it harder for people to pay attention, remember information, solve problems, and make good decisions.” 意为:“研究已经表明,高温会使人们更难集中注意力、记忆信息、解决问题和做出正确决定。”因此正确答案为D。Q2. B.【解析】细节题。题目出处为:“... students in the warmer rooms performed worse. They answered fewer questions correctly and took longer to complete the attention test.” 意为:“……处在较热房间里的学生表现更差,他们答对的问题更少,完成注意力测试所花的时间也更长。”因此正确答案为B。Q3. A.【解析】推断题。题目出处为:“Of course, one study cannot tell us everything. The number of students was relatively small, and they were all university students.” 意为:“当然,一项研究不能说明所有问题,因为参与者人数较少,而且都是大学生。”由此可以推断,研究样本有限,因此其结果需要谨慎理解,不能简单推广到所有人群。故正确答案为A。Q4. C.【解析】理解题。题目出处为:“They found that people who experienced more very hot days tended to perform worse on tests of memory and mathematical ability.” 意为:“研究发现,经历更多高温天气的人,在记忆和数学能力测试中的表现往往更差。”由此可知,长期暴露于极端高温可能与认知能力下降有关,因此正确答案为C。Q5. D.【解析】细节与推断题。题目出处为:“When a decision cannot be delayed, take your time, check your reasoning carefully, and ask someone else for advice.” 以及结尾处“… cooling your body may be a good way to help your brain work better, too.” 意为:“如果一项重要决定无法推迟,反而应当慢慢考虑,仔细检查自己的思路,并向他人寻求建议。”以及“给身体降降温,可能也有助于让大脑更好地运转。”因此可以概括为在高温环境下做重要决定前,应先给自己降降温并认真思考,故正确答案为D。 (本文图片来源于摄图网,版权归摄图网所有)

新闻听力 | 每天步行多少步能防止发胖?

每天步行多少步能防止发胖?How many daily steps can help keep weight off?常速 | 五级(偏难) | 443词 | 2min59s刘立军供稿Part I. QUESTIONSListen to the passage and choose the best answer to each question you hear.Q1. What daily step goal does the study suggest may help people maintain weight loss?A. Around 6,000 steps each day.B. Around 7,000 steps each day.C. Around 8,500 steps each day.D. Around 10,000 steps each day.Q2. What kind of data did the researchers analyze in the study?A. Medical records from several health institutions.B. Data collected from eighteen earlier studies.C. Survey responses from daily fitness users.D. Interviews with doctors at obesity clinics.Q3. According to the study, what did researchers discover about walking during weight loss programs?A. It immediately improved participants’ overall health.B. It replaced the need for diet changes.C. It helped people lose weight much faster.D. It showed limited effect on additional weight loss.Q4. What can be inferred about the role of physical activity in weight management?A. It works best when combined with medical treatment.B. It is more helpful for keeping weight off long term.C. It is mainly useful for people with severe obesity.D. It is more effective than diet control at first.Q5. What does Dr. Tara Narula mainly suggest about the study findings?A. They should be considered a useful but preliminary result.B. They should guide people to exercise exactly 8,500 steps.C. They should replace traditional weight loss advice.D. They should be applied to every adult immediately.Part II. TRANSCRIPTHow many daily steps can help keep weight off?(Q1) A new study suggests that increasing daily step counts may help people maintain weight loss in the long term, and a goal to shoot for may be around 8,500 steps a day.(Q2) The research, published in the International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health and presented last week at the European Obesity Conference, analyzed data from 18 previous studies looking at weight loss and physical activity.(Q3) Researchers found that walking more was not strongly linked to losing additional weight during active weight loss programs. However, people who continued taking more steps each day were more likely to keep the weight off over time.Over an average follow-up period of about 1.5 years, researchers found participants maintained roughly 1% of weight loss for every additional 1,000 steps they walked daily, with the average participant starting at about 7,400 steps per day at baseline.The study noted that an average of 8,500 daily steps appeared to help participants maintain weight loss the longest, though researchers stressed that it is not a strict target or prescription for everyone.prescription n. 处方;建议;规定The increased activity happened as part of structured lifestyle programs that also included diet changes and behavioral counseling.“This was a lifestyle modification program, and it really is a multifactorial approach when it comes to weight loss. So these individuals got diet and behavioral counseling in addition to really moving more. And so you really need all of that,” ABC News medical contributor Dr. Tara Narula said on “Good Morning America” Monday.multifactorial adj. 多因素的;由多种因素造成的(Q5) Narula noted that researchers described the findings as “hypothesis-generating” and said more research is needed.“The researchers say, look, this is really hypothesis-generating; it should push us to do more research,” she explained. “It is not a prescription that everyone should go out and now do 8,500 steps. But it is helpful information.”(Q4) Researchers concluded that calorie restriction was likely more impactful during the weight loss phase, while higher levels of physical activity were more closely tied to long-term weight loss maintenance.The study also had several limitations. The analysis only included adults who were overweight or obese and relied on pooled population data, meaning the findings show correlation rather than direct cause and effect.correlation n. 相互关系;关联“Certainly if you’re planning to do a weight loss program, talk to your doctor about what is right for you in terms of your movement and goals overall,” Narula said. “And healthy habits build on each other. The more you lose weight, the more you want to exercise, and you feel better. But it really is helpful to know that just that little bit of increase might be all you need.”Part III. KEYQ1.C.【解析】细节题。题目出处为:“A new study suggests that increasing daily step counts may help people maintain weight loss in the long term, and a goal to shoot for may be around 8,500 steps a day.” 意为:“一项新的研究表明,增加每日步数或许有助于长期保持减重效果,建议将每日步数目标设置为每天8500步左右。”该句直接给出了研究所建议的步数目标,因此正确答案为C。Q2.B.【解析】细节题。题目出处为:“The research, published in the International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health and presented last week at the European Obesity Conference, analyzed data from 18 previous studies looking at weight loss and physical activity.” 意为:“这项研究发表在《国际环境研究与公共健康期刊》上,并于上周在欧洲肥胖大会上做了报告。研究分析了此前18项探讨减重和身体活动关系的相关数据。”该句明确说明研究的数据来源,因此正确答案为B。Q3.D.【解析】细节题。题目出处为:“Researchers found that walking more was not strongly linked to losing additional weight during active weight loss programs.” 意为:“研究人员发现,在减重计划进行阶段,多走路与进一步减轻体重之间并没有很强的联系。”由此可知,在减重过程中增加步数并不会显著带来额外的减重效果,因此正确答案为D。Q4.B.【解析】推理题。题目出处为:“Researchers concluded that calorie restriction was likely more impactful during the weight loss phase, while higher levels of physical activity were more closely tied to long-term weight loss maintenance.” 意为:“研究人员得出结论,在减重阶段限制热量摄入的作用可能更为显著,而更高强度的运动则与长期维持减重成果关系更为密切。”由此可以推断,运动对于维持长期减重更为有效,因此正确答案为B。Q5.A.【解析】观点题。题目出处为:“Narula noted that researchers described the findings as ‘hypothesis generating’ and said more research is needed.” 意为:“纳鲁拉指出,研究人员将这些发现定性为‘生成假说’性质,并强调仍需要进一步研究。” 该句表明研究结果具有一定参考价值,但仍属于初步发现,需要进一步研究验证,因此正确答案为A。(本文图片来源于摄图网,版权归摄图网所有)

新闻听力 | 疫苗:科学与恐慌之争

Vaccines: Science vs. Scare疫苗:科学与恐慌之争常速 | 五级(难)| 784词 | 5min22s刘立军供稿Part I. QUESTIONSListen to the interview and choose the best answer to each question you hear.Q1. What is the only disease that humanity has eradicated? A. Polio. B. Smallpox. C. Measles. D. Malaria. Q2. What does Dr. Kate O’Brien suggest about the concept of “natural immunity”? A. It is more effective than vaccination. B. It is a safer way to develop immunity. C. It involves the immune system responding to germs. D. It is recommended for children by most scientists. Q3. What can be inferred about the immune system from the discussion? A. It is constantly exposed to microbes. B. It is overwhelmed by multiple vaccines. C. It cannot mature without vaccination. D. It is weaker in children than in adults. Q4. What is the main purpose of timing the vaccination schedule? A. To ensure vaccines are given at the lowest cost. B. To align with WHO global recommendations. C. To provide protection when children are most at risk. D. To avoid interference between different vaccines. Q5. What is the main idea of the passage? A. To introduce the global smallpox eradication campaign and its achievements.B. To answer parents’ common worries and misunderstandings about vaccination.C. To explain the complete standards of WHO’s official vaccine schedule.D. To compare natural immunity and vaccine immunity in detail.Part II. TRANSCRIPTVaccines: Science vs. ScareVGS: We’re standing here in front of the statue commemorating the smallpox eradication campaign. (Q1) Smallpox being the only disease that the world, humanity, has eradicated. This WHO-led campaign was the first mass vaccination campaign that brought together countries, experts and communities. Today, we have 30 vaccines that can prevent many many diseases. And 154 million lives have been saved, in the last 50 years, by just 14 of those vaccines. So if you’re a new parent, you may have questions about vaccines. We have Doctor Kate O'Brien here with us to answer your questions. Kate, let’s start with — parents may have heard what if we let our child get sick and develop immunity rather than vaccinate them? What is your advice regarding that?smallpox n. 天花 vaccinate v. 接种疫苗 KOB: The first thing I want to say is that the vaccines that have been developed that are in our program, are vaccines against serious diseases. Sometimes we hear the term natural immunity. And I really want to address this question. (Q2) Some people think that getting infected is somehow more natural than it is to develop your immunity from a vaccination. And I really want to disavow this. It’s the immune system in either circumstance is responding to either a germ or the vaccine itself. What’s most important is that exposing children to infections and risking the consequences of serious disease, and in the worst circumstances, death, is not what any parent would want to do.disavow v. 否认,拒绝承认 VGS: Another question that young parents may have is if you give a child many vaccines at the same time, you might overwhelm their immune system. What would you say to that?KOB: (Q3) Children are exposed to, in fact, millions of different microbes in the natural environment around us, in their foods, in the environment, by touching things, in their own bodies. We all have, in fact, more microbes in our body than we do human cells. This is an important way that children’s immune systems develop. The issue is, how to allow children to develop immunity against those germs that are consequential, that are serious, that cause disease. So the point around the vaccines is, children’s immune systems are more than able to respond to multiple vaccines, given at the same time, and multiple doses that are given over the course of their lifetime. Although we perceive that they’re being given “a lot of vaccines” in fact, on a daily basis, children are being exposed and sampling that outside world of those microbes all the time. The immune system is an incredibly powerful system. It’s amazing the way that it matures and identifies which is friend and which is foe in the environment. And vaccines are the safest way to actually derive protection for children, adolescents and adults against the consequential germs.consequential adj. 重要的,意义重大的 VGS: Can parents maybe stagger the schedule? Give a little space? Would that still have the same impact that you are seeking in protecting the child?KOB: Yeah. So this seems like a common sense, logical thing to do. We have studies that tell us in what sequence the vaccines should be given, how many doses should be given and how far apart they should be. Now, when you mess around with that schedule, there are consequences of doing that. First, it means that children may miss the doses that they should get. Second, it means that they may not get the vaccines at the time when they most need them. (Q4) We time the schedule so that the protection is developed before the period of time when children are most at risk of the particular disease that the vaccine is protecting against. And third, there are some vaccines that need to be timed relative to other vaccines that are in the schedule. They don’t work as well if they’re timed incorrectly. So that’s the reason why we have pediatricians, scientists, epidemiologists who make the recommendations within each country for what the schedule should be.VGS: So WHO makes a recommendation, right? But who is deciding on what vaccinations a citizen receives?KOB: Countries are the ones who decide on their schedule. What WHO does is, because we’re a global recommending body, we pull together experts from around the world. We ask them to look at all of the evidence that is available and we provide recommendations to countries. They can rely on the aggregated evidence that we’ve put together, so they can also deliberate on what makes most sense for their particular circumstance.VGS: Thank you Kate. I have additional questions. I’m sure our viewers have additional questions. So we will take this in part two where we will answer some of your questions on vaccines. Until next time then, stay safe, stay healthy and stick with science.Part III. KEYQ1. B.【解析】细节题。根据“Smallpox being the only disease that the world, humanity, has eradicated.”, 此句明确指出天花是人类唯一消灭的疾病,因此正确答案为B。 Q2. C.【解析】细节题。根据“Some people think that getting infected is somehow more natural than it is to develop your immunity from a vaccination… It’s the immune system in either circumstance is responding to either a germ or the vaccine itself.”,该句说明无论是自然感染还是接种疫苗,免疫系统都会对外来病菌产生反应,因此正确答案为C。 Q3. A.【解析】推理题。根据“Children are exposed to, in fact, millions of different microbes in the natural environment around us, in their foods, in the environment, by touching things, in their own bodies.”,此处说明孩子在日常环境、食物、身体中时刻接触数百万微生物,免疫系统长期接触各类细菌,因此可以推断正确答案为A。 Q4. C.【解析】细节题。根据“We time the schedule so that the protection is developed before the period of time when children are most at risk of the particular disease that the vaccine is protecting against”,该句明确指出安排疫苗接种时间是为了在儿童高危阶段前建立防护,因此正确答案为C。 Q5. B.【解析】主旨题。文章主要围绕疫苗对儿童的重要性以及父母对疫苗的常见顾虑展开,专家逐一破除误区、解答疑惑,因此正确答案为B。 (本文图片来源于摄图网,版权归摄图网所有)

新闻听力 | 香烟如何影响身体?

香烟如何影响身体?How do cigarettes affect the body?常速 | 七级(偏易)| 699词 | 4min49s刘立军供稿Part I. QUESTIONSListen to the interview and choose the best answer to each question you hear.Q1. What substance in cigarettes is responsible for making smoking highly addictive? A. Tar. B. Carbon monoxide. C. Nicotine. D. Arsenic. Q2. What is one of the immediate physical benefits of quitting smoking? A. Improved eyesight and bone strength. B. Stabilization of carbon monoxide levels. C. Restoration of DNA repair processes. D. Reduced risk of erectile dysfunction. Q3. What happens to the cilia in the lungs after quitting smoking for 9 months? A. They are permanently damaged. B. They start producing harmful chemicals. C. They become less effective in cleaning airways. D. They are restored and improve resistance to infection. Q4. What can be inferred about the long-term effects of quitting smoking? A. Quitting smoking has no impact on coronary heart disease. B. The body gradually regains its ability to repair DNA. C. Lung cancer risk remains unchanged after quitting smoking. D. The benefits of quitting smoking are limited to younger smokers. Q5. What is the main purpose of the text? A. To highlight the dangers of smoking and benefits of quitting. B. To explain the chemical composition of cigarettes. C. To discuss the psychological challenges of quitting smoking. D. To analyze the global impact of smoking-related diseases. Part II. TRANSCRIPTHow do cigarettes affect the body?Cigarettes aren’t good for us. That’s hardly news — we’ve known about the dangers of smoking for decades. But how exactly do cigarettes harm us? Let’s look at what happens as their ingredients make their way through our bodies, and how we benefit physically when we finally give up smoking.With each inhalation, smoke brings its more than 5,000 chemical substances into contact with the body’s tissues. From the start, tar, a black, resinous material, begins to coat the teeth and gums, damaging tooth enamel, and eventually causing decay. Over time, smoke also damages nerve-endings in the nose, causing loss of smell.Inside the airways and lungs, smoke increases the likelihood of infections, as well as chronic diseases like bronchitis and emphysema. It does this by damaging the cilia, tiny hairlike structures whose job it is to keep the airways clean. It then fills the alveoli, tiny air sacs that enable the exchange of oxygen and carbon dioxide between the lungs and blood. A toxic gas called carbon monoxide crosses that membrane into the blood, binding to hemoglobin and displacing the oxygen it would usually have transported around the body. That’s one of the reasons smoking can lead to oxygen deprivation and shortness of breath.bronchitis n. 支气管炎 emphysema n. 肺气肿 alveoli n. 肺泡 sac n. 囊,气囊 membrane n. 膜 hemoglobin n. 血红蛋白 (Q1) Within about 10 seconds, the bloodstream carries a stimulant called nicotine to the brain, triggering the release of dopamine and other neurotransmitters including endorphins that create the pleasurable sensations which make smoking highly addictive. Nicotine and other chemicals from the cigarette simultaneously cause constriction of blood vessels and damage their delicate endothelial lining, restricting blood flow. These vascular effects lead to thickening of blood vessel walls and enhance blood platelet stickiness, increasing the likelihood that clots will form and trigger heart attacks and strokes.dopamine n. 多巴胺 neurotransmitter n. 神经递质 endorphin n. 内啡肽 endothelial adj. 内皮的 lining n. 内衬,内膜 Many of the chemicals inside cigarettes can trigger dangerous mutations in the body’s DNA that make cancers form. Additionally, ingredients like arsenic and nickel may disrupt the process of DNA repair, thus compromising the body’s ability to fight many cancers. In fact, about one of every three cancer deaths in the United States is caused by smoking.And it’s not just lung cancer. Smoking can cause cancer in multiple tissues and organs, as well as damaged eyesight and weakened bones. It makes it harder for women to get pregnant. And in men, it can cause erectile dysfunction.dysfunction n. 功能障碍 But for those who quit smoking, there’s a huge positive upside with almost immediate and long-lasting physical benefits.Just 20 minutes after a smoker’s final cigarette, their heart rate and blood pressure begin to return to normal. (Q2) After 12 hours, carbon monoxide levels stabilize, increasing the blood’s oxygen-carrying capacity. A day after ceasing, heart attack risk begins to decrease as blood pressure and heart rates normalize. After two days, the nerve endings responsible for smell and taste start to recover.Lungs become healthier after about one month, with less coughing and shortness of breath. (Q3) The delicate hair-like cilia in the airways and lungs start recovering within weeks, and are restored after 9 months, improving resistance to infection.cilia n. 纤毛 By the one-year anniversary of quitting, heart disease risk plummets to half as blood vessel function improves. Five years in, the chance of a clot forming dramatically declines, and the risk of stroke continues to reduce. (Q4) After ten years, the chances of developing fatal lung cancer go down by 50%, probably because the body’s ability to repair DNA is once again restored. Fifteen years in, the likelihood of developing coronary heart disease is essentially the same as that of a non-smoker.plummet v. 暴跌,骤降 coronary adj. 冠状的,冠状动脉的 There’s no point pretending this is all easy to achieve. Quitting can lead to anxiety and depression, resulting from nicotine withdrawal. But fortunately, such effects are usually temporary. And quitting is getting easier, thanks to a growing arsenal of tools. Nicotine replacement therapy through gum, skin patches, lozenges, and sprays may help wean smokers off cigarettes. They work by stimulating nicotine receptors in the brain and thus preventing withdrawal symptoms, without the addition of other harmful chemicals. Counselling and support groups, cognitive behavioral therapy, and moderate intensity exercise also help smokers stay cigarette-free.lozenge n. 含片,润喉片 wean v. 使断奶,使戒掉 That’s good news, since quitting puts you and your body on the path back to health.Part III. KEYQ1. C.【解析】细节题。根据“Within about 10 seconds, the bloodstream carries a stimulant called nicotine to the brain, triggering the release of dopamine and other neurotransmitters.”,可知血液将一种叫尼古丁的刺激物输送到大脑,触发多巴胺和其他神经递质的释放,使人吸烟成瘾。正确答案为C。 Q2. B.【解析】细节题。根据“After 12 hours, carbon monoxide levels stabilize, increasing the blood’s oxygen-carrying capacity.”,可知在戒烟后12小时,血液中的一氧化碳水平稳定下来,增加了血液携带氧气的能力,是戒烟后即时身体益处。正确答案为B。 Q3. D.【解析】细节题。根据“The delicate hair-like cilia in the airways and lungs start recovering within weeks, and are restored after 9 months, improving resistance to infection.”,可知呼吸道和肺部的纤毛在几周内开始恢复,并在9个月后恢复,提高了对感染的抵抗力。正确答案为D。 Q4. B.【解析】推理题。根据“After ten years, the chances of developing fatal lung cancer go down by 50%, probably because the body’s ability to repair DNA is once again restored.”,可知在戒烟十年后,患致命肺癌的几率下降了50%,可能是因为身体修复DNA的能力再次恢复。从中可以推断,戒烟后身体会逐渐恢复修复DNA的能力。正确答案为B。 Q5. A.【解析】主旨题。文章主要讨论了吸烟对身体的危害以及戒烟带来的健康益处处。正确答案为A。 (本文图片来源于摄图网,版权归摄图网所有)

第12届教学大赛商务英语组特等奖潘紫萌说课

说课点评:在30分钟的准备时间里,读完、理解一篇800多词的商务英语文章,记住文章的结构和要点,设计出一套有理论指导、教学理念清晰、目标合理、结构完整、方法得当,最好再带点创新的教学方案,然后在10分钟的时间里,用英语条理清晰地把它展示出来,这对任何商务英语教师来讲都是一项重大的挑战。潘紫萌老师首先分析了课文,根据内容将其解构成三大部分。选手将第二部分(第3-8段)归纳成 promotion, price and place 和将第三部分(第9段)归纳成对计划进入中国市场的外国企业的忠告,这都是正确的。但是,她把第一部分(第1-2段)归纳成product,进而把前两部分归纳成营销学中著名的4P战略,这种做法有待商榷。因为课文的第1段主要讲两个问题:1)营销战略如何在中国成功,2)这些战略如何根据中国人的喜好以及对产品或服务的认知进行调整,而不是具体的产品。也许是准备的时间非常紧迫,选手对课文的理解和归纳出现了偏差。然后,潘老师分析了学生的特点。在教学模式上,她采取以学生为中心、以产出为导向的教学模式。其教学目标包括商务英语知识、商务技能和伦理价值。在具体的教学方法上,她例举了基于任务的教学、基于讨论的教学、案例教学、学生参与的测评等,并强调要综合利用线上线下教学资源。在学习测评上,她采用师生共同参与的方式,以增强教学效果。至于具体的教学步骤,她采用BOPPPS模式,再加课后作业。以上教学方案应该说中规中矩,显示出潘老师对商务英语教学的理论、模式、方法和测评等各要素有比较全面的了解。潘老师最亮眼的表现是在10分钟的时间里,用流利的英语将其教学方案展现出来,而且条理清晰,相关的教学理论、教学方法、商务知识、商务案例均了然于胸,信手拈来,同时口到手到,同步将所讲内容写到白板上,手起笔落,一气呵成。在提问阶段,潘老师的表现依旧出色,理解到位,回答中肯,表现出较高的英语基本功和商务、人文素养。不过有的回答可以再精炼一些。比如在回答第一个问题时,把EGP,EOP,EAP,ESP 的定义都讲了一遍,有点啰嗦。总而言之,潘紫萌在说课中表现突出,是一位素质比较全面、经验比较丰富的优秀商务英语教师。点评专家:陈准民

第12届教学大赛英语专业组二等奖赵雪宇授课

授课点评:赵雪宇老师展示了“3A设计”,整合了准备、习得与应用这三个不同的教学阶段。对教学阶段和教学过程的表述比较清晰,教学过程在“3A设计”的基础上展开,强调学生参与的多元形式,例如学生提问、学生评价、学生总结等。设计框架层次清晰。教学展示与教学设计紧密地融合在了一起。展示伊始,教师提醒学生回忆“3A设计”,并且多次使用“I want you to be/do…”的句式,运用丰富的肢体语言、重读、停顿等方式明确提出了自己的期待,帮助学生更加直观地获得课堂学习的方向感。此外,教师对学生的分享做出了真诚的回应,而不只是用简短的评价话语敷衍了事,这对学习共同体的建构大有助益。这同时体现出教师对英语有着较好的掌握程度,能够从容、准确地重述学生观点,帮助学生修正语言表述上的错误,并提供更加规范、高效的表达方式。整体而言,赵老师在教学展示过程中教态得体,状态自然、松弛,说课清晰,且能够脱离讲稿等材料的辅助完成授课。课堂教学紧密围绕教学目标,环环相扣,逐步深入。她有效运用了多媒体课件,运用多样的视图突出核心教学内容,起到了辅助作用。可以看出赵老师的整体状态(尤其体现为笑容、身势,对重读、停顿的运用,以及真诚的回应)有效吸引了学生的注意力,激发了学生的学习兴趣,为学生创设了安全的发言空间,让学生有分享欲,愿意主动参与课堂互动。最后,建议赵老师未来可以在分析课文内容的同时,进一步在词汇层面对近义词加以辨析。点评专家:杨延宁

教育培训更多

基于案例驱动的外语教学研究论文写作

课程目标本期研修课程坚持学以致用理念,力求帮助参训者掌握可复用的论文写作方法,能从自身教学课堂挖掘研究选题,合理选择适配的研究范式,独立完成一篇结构完整、论证严谨的外语教学研究论文;同时反哺教学反思,促使教师以科研视角审视课堂,实现教研相长,助力教师专业发展与课题、论文成果产出。1. 夯实学术基础,优化完整写作流程帮助参训者系统掌握外语教学研究论文的学术规范、结构框架与期刊评价标准,厘清教研论文与教学经验总结、心得体会的核心区别,破除写作认知误区,建立从选题构思、文献梳理、研究设计到成果撰写、总结升华的完整学术写作思维。2. 攻克核心写作难点,掌握分章节实操技巧通过正反案例对比、范文深度拆解,精准掌握论文引言、文献综述、研究设计、结果分析、讨论结语各大核心模块的写作逻辑与行文技巧,有效解决选题宽泛、文献堆砌、研究方法误用、论证薄弱、逻辑脱节等高频问题,熟练规避论文写作常见雷区。3. 精通多元研究范式,适配不同教研场景系统掌握外语教学质化、量化、混合研究三种主流研究方法的适用场景、设计规范与撰写要点,能够结合自身课堂教学场景、研究素材与研究需求,精准选择适配的研究范式,独立完成科学、规范、严谨的研究方案设计。4. 强化科研转化能力,实现教研双向赋能引导参训者学会从日常课堂教学、教学改革、学情分析、课程实践中挖掘学术研究切入点,实现教学经验学术化、课堂案例成果化,具备独立撰写高质量外语教学研究论文的能力,助力论文发表、课题申报等教研成果积累。5. 树立严谨学术思维,提升科研创新素养培养参训者批判性文献研读能力、学术问题提炼能力与研究创新能力,学会精准识别研究空白、提炼研究创新点,掌握行文逻辑、学术规范与校验方法,全面提升外语科研素养与学术写作水平。

AI时代职业院校教师教学能力及数字素养提升专题培训

一、组织单位主办单位:教育部职业教育发展中心承办单位:上海外教社教育培训中心二、课程目标本次培训内容聚焦职业院校AI时代职业院校外语教师教学能力与数字素养提升路径,通过主题讲座、工作坊、案例解析、互动交流、成果展示等环节,重点围绕数字化教学设计、AI技术与教育教学深度融合、数字素养能力提升等核心议题,推动培训成果向教学实践的有效转化。具体包括:1.素养导向,教学为重。课程围绕 AI 赋能职业院校外语教学与教师数字素养提升路径展开,既讲解人工智能重塑外语课堂的全新教学范式,系统拆解《教师数字素养》五大维度标准,又通过实操工作坊手把手教授大语言模型、教学智能体、多模态教学资源开发等工具实操,明确AI工具使用边界,平衡技术应用与立德树人根本目标。2.聚焦外语课堂核心流程优化。采用理论讲授、案例研讨、实操演练相结合的闭环研修模式,覆盖AI辅助教学设计、人机协同口语智能测评等内容,结合岗课赛证融合要求融入跨文化能力培育,针对性解决传统外语教学资源单一、分层教学难、口语评价低效等一线痛点。3.兼顾教学成果产出与外语教师长效专业发展。培训过程组织分组共创、成果展示与互动点评,打磨可复制推广的AI外语教学案例;同时传授借助AI开展文献整理、数据采集、教研论文撰写的方法,以教促研、以研优教,搭建教学转化科研的成长路径。三、课程模块课程模块1AI 时代职业外语教师数字素养深度解读(专题讲座+案例研讨)1. 《教师数字素养》五大维度标准解析:数字化意识、数字技术知识与技能、数字化应用、数字社会责任、专业发展,结合职业外语课堂场景逐条落地解读,明确职校外语教师数字素养能力画像。2. AI 重塑职业外语教学新范式:生成式AI给听、说、读、写、译、跨文化教学带来机遇与挑战;厘清AI工具使用伦理边界、版权风险、认知保护,坚守立德树人根本目标,避免技术滥用与学生思维惰性。3. 优秀案例研讨:优秀职校外语教师数字素养实践案例分享,对比“技术堆砌”和“素养导向”两种课堂模式差异。课程模块2大语言模型辅助职业外语教学设计与实施(案例研讨+实践工作坊)1. 大语言模型基础认知:主流大模型在外语教学各场景中的应用,提示词设计核心原则与技巧。2. 备课环节实操:• AI生成适配高职 / 中职外语的教案、岗位情境任务、分级阅读素材、职场外语对话脚本;• 基于岗课赛证要求,用大模型改造原有课程内容,融入职业场景、跨文化交际任务。3. 课堂教学应用实操:• AI 辅助听力、读写课堂:生成分层练习题、小组讨论议题、课堂辩论素材;• AI辅助写作教学:AI 提供写作初稿、润色、错误诊断、修改建议,教师聚焦高阶思辨、职场语体评价,规避学生直接抄袭 AI 结果。4. 学业评价实操:人机协同批改外语作业。5. 分组实训任务:选取一门自己任教的外语课程,现场完成一份大模型辅助的课时教学设计初稿;小组互评,专家现场点评优化。课程模块3教学智能体赋能外语教学全流程(案例研讨+实践工作坊)1.教学智能体基础:什么是教学智能体,RAG检索增强技术在外语教学的价值;区分通用大模型和定制教学智能体的差异。2.课前辅助:定制专业外语智能助教,导入课程语料、行业岗位外语知识库,生成学情预测试卷,完成学生学情画像。3. 课中辅助:•人机协同口语智能测评实操:智能体作为虚拟对话伙伴,开展职场情景口语模拟,完成发音、流利度测评;教师聚焦交际策略、跨文化表现点评;•课堂分组任务:智能体辅助小组协作,生成任务脚手架,动态收集课堂学习数据。4. 课后辅助:智能体实现分层作业推送、个性化答疑、错题归纳,减轻教师重复性辅导工作。5. 实践任务:基于自己课程,配置简易外语教学智能体,生成一套课前‑课中‑课后完整智能教学流程方案;研讨智能体使用风险,如何避免学生过度依赖 AI。课程模块4AI 赋能课堂思维转型——从知识灌输到高阶能力培育(案例研讨+实操演练+现场产出)1. AI赋能情景式教学:运用5C流程创设情境、设置挑战、生成角色卡、搭建认知脚手架并引导反思,实现A1与课堂情境深度融合。2. AI赋能混合式教学:基于TRACE框架,结合MEAISMILE平台与多智能体协同案例,辅助教师完成混合式课堂改造方案设计。3. AI赋能项目式教学:参照PBL黄金标准与SCALE范式,通过实操练习,辅助教师完成项目式教学全流程设计。课程模块5AI赋能教学成果产出与教师长效专业发展(共创工坊 + 成果展示)1. AI 外语教学案例打磨:分组共创,基于前序模块产出的教学设计,完善完整教学案例,包含教学目标、AI 工具选用、人机分工、实施流程、评价方式、教学反思。2. 成果展示互评:各组展示 AI 外语教学案例,专家点评,形成可复制的优秀案例库素材。3. 训后持续发展路径:如何构建个人AI教学资源库;虚拟教研室、教学共同体建设;线下返岗实践任务布置。

AI智能体对外语科研的重构:选题新思路与研究新路径

一、研修目标1. 选题精准化。借助AI智能体的文献洞察与趋势分析能力,帮助参训者突破信息茧房,精准定位具有学术价值与现实意义的前沿选题,避免低水平重复研究。2.设计系统化。AI智能体辅助构建完整的研究框架,实现从理论选择、方法设计到数据采集方案的全链条逻辑校验,提升研究设计的科学性与严谨性。3.申报高效化。通过智能体的多轮对话与文本优化能力,参训者可在科研论文或项目申报书撰写过程中获得持续的逻辑论证支持、语言表达润色及格式规范检查,显著提高文本质量与申报效率。4.能力可持续化。本项目不仅传授具体工具操作,更注重培养参训者与AI智能体协同工作的思维模式与方法论,以期在研修结束后仍能持续运用智能体技术推动自身学术发展,实现科研能力跃升。二、研修特色1.升级认知,建立科学的技术应用观参训者掌握AI智能体的核心能力特征(自主规划、多步推理、工具调用、协作执行),并能批判性地评估AI智能体在外语科研各环节中的适用边界与伦理风险,建立"人机协同、以人为主"的科研智能体应用观。2.掌握技能,形成智能体科研工作流参训者独立完成AI智能体的配置与定制,熟练运用智能体进行文献综述生成、研究问题提炼、理论框架构建、研究方法设计、项目申报书逻辑论证等核心科研任务,掌握提示词工程、工作流编排、插件调用等关键技术技能,形成个人化的AI智能体科研工作流。3. 产出成果,实施个性化诊断与深度辅导研修前通过问卷与材料预审进行学情诊断,研修中强化晚间一对一深度辅导,帮助参训者在研修期间至少完成一项可交付的科研成果雏形,包括但不限于:一份经过AI智能体辅助优化的科研项目申报书初稿、一个完整的研究设计方案、或一套可复用的AI智能体科研工作流配置文件。4. 共建社群,构建专业发展共同体构建持续活跃的AI智能体应用实践社群,参训者在研修后仍能通过社群进行经验分享、问题互助、资源互通,促进研修成果的持续转化与社群生态的良性发展。三、课程设置(一)课程模块本项目设置四大核心课程模块,层层递进,系统构建参训者应用技术赋能科研的能力。模块一:AI智能体认知与科研赋能理路帮助参训者建立对AI智能体技术的系统认知,理解其在外语科研中的应用逻辑与伦理边界。核心内容包括:AI智能体的技术原理与能力特征解析;AI智能体与通用大语言模型的本质区别;外语科研全链条中AI智能体的赋能节点与适用场景;AI智能体应用的学术伦理规范与风险防范策略;国内外AI智能体赋能科研的前沿案例评析。模块二:AI智能体赋能科研选题与文献综述帮助参训者掌握运用AI智能体进行高效文献检索、趋势分析与选题论证的方法。核心内容包括:AI智能体驱动的文献检索策略与工具调用技巧;基于智能体的研究热点识别与趋势预测方法;AI智能体辅助研究问题提炼与创新性评估;文献综述的智能生成与批判性审校;选题可行性的多维度智能评估框架。模块三:AI智能体赋能研究设计与方案构建培养参训者运用AI智能体进行系统化研究设计的能力。核心内容包括:AI智能体辅助理论框架选择与适配性分析;研究方法的智能推荐与逻辑校验;数据采集与分析方案的自动化构建;研究设计的多轮对话式优化与迭代;AI智能体生成的研究方案的学术规范性审查。模块四:AI智能体赋能项目申报书撰写与优化提升参训者运用AI智能体优化文本质量与论证逻辑的能力。核心内容包括:申报书各部分的智能体辅助撰写策略;论证逻辑的智能校验与强化方法;学术语言表达的智能润色与风格统一;申报书格式规范的自动化检查;基于评审标准的申报书模拟评估与优化建议。(二)课程安排本项目为期两天集中研修,辅以晚间个性化辅导,具体日程安排如下:10月31日 上午8:40-11:50模块一:AI智能体认知与科研赋能理路主要内容:l AI智能体技术原理与能力特征解析;l 外语科研全链条中AI智能体的赋能节点与适用场景;l 实操演示与参训者上机体验10月31日下午14:00-17:10模块二:AI智能体赋能科研选题与文献综述主要内容:l AI智能体驱动的文献检索策略与工具调用;l 研究热点识别与趋势分析;l 选题论证实操与案例研讨10月31日晚间18:30-20:00个性化辅导专场(一)主要内容:参训者携带个人申报材料或研究构想,接受专家一对一深度辅导与智能体配置指导11月1日 上午8:40-11:50模块三:AI智能体赋能研究设计与方案构建主要内容:l AI智能体辅助理论框架选择与研究方法设计;l 数据采集方案自动化构建;l 实操演练与方案互评11月1日下午14:00-17:10模块四:AI智能体赋能申报书撰写与优化主要内容:l 申报书各部分智能体辅助撰写;l 论证逻辑智能校验;l 学术语言润色;l 申报书优化实操与成果展示11月1日晚间18:30-20:00个性化辅导专场(二)主要内容:聚焦参训者研修成果的最终打磨与后续科研规划指导四、专家简介(按姓氏拼音排序)王峰:山东大学翻译学院教授、博士生导师、博士后合作导师,同济大学文学博士、布鲁塞尔自由大学应用语言学博士,国际韩礼德语言学研究会秘书长,山东省泰山学者青年专家。主持国家社科1项,省部级课题4项。研究方向:文体学、话语分析、语料库翻译学。在English Studies, Atlantis, Perspectives, Critical Arts, Humanitiesand Social Sciences Communications,Southern AfricanLinguistics and Applied Language Studies, SAGE Open, Psychology in the Schools,Australian Journal of Linguistics, Style, Target, Functions of Language,Chinese Semiotic Studies, Plos One,《外国语》《中国外语》《中国翻译》《外语教学》《外语研究》《外语教学理论与实践》《外语电化教学》《上海翻译》等国内外核心期刊上发表论文50余篇。杨港:博士、博士后,山东大学外国语学院副教授、硕士生导师。研究方向为外语教学理论与实践,学术兴趣包括 AI 赋能的外语教学设计与评价、外语学习者认知与心理、外语教师发展等;主持国家社科基金一般项目、教育部人文社科研究青年基金项目、中国博士后科学基金面上资助项目、山东省本科教学改革研究项目等课题各1项、山东省社科规划研究项目2项;出版专著2部;主编教材5套14部,其中国家级规划教材6部;发表论文20余篇,其中 16篇收录于CSSCI来源期刊(如《外语界》《外语与外语教学》《外语电化教学》)、SSCI一区期刊(如System, Education and Information Technologies, InternationalJournal of Multilingualism);获评山东省高等教育教学成果二等奖、山东省社会科学优秀成果三等奖和山东省普通高等教育一流教材以及“宝钢教育奖励基金”和“邵一兵教育奖励基金”。主要学术兼职包括:国家社科基金项目成果鉴定专家(获全国哲学社会科学工作办公室颁发的“认真负责的鉴定专家”荣誉称号)、多家CSSCI来源期刊以及SSCI期刊审稿专家等。

特色工具

系统产品

重点教材