新闻听力 | 萎靡驼背的姿态真的对我们有害吗?

萎靡驼背的姿态真的对我们有害吗?Is slouching really that bad for us? 常速 | 五级(中等) | 340词 | 2min13s刘立军供稿Part I. QUESTIONSListen to the passage and choose the best answer to each question you hear.Q1. What does Meghan Markowski say poor posture can lead to?A. Weight gain and muscle loss.B. Neck pain and back problems.C. Poor eyesight and hearing loss.D. Difficulty concentrating on tasks.Q2. What did Diane Slater and her colleagues conclude about slouching?A. It is the main cause of chronic diseases.B. It has been proven to damage the spine.C. There is no strong evidence that it aggravates back pain.D. It should be completely avoided at all times.Q3. What did the 2014 study by Johannes Michalak find?A. Slouching improves memory for positive words.B. Upright sitting increases physical strength.C. Slumped posture affects emotional recall.D. Good posture eliminates negative emotions.Q4. What can be inferred from the discussion about static posture?A. Moving regularly helps reduce the risk of back pain.B. Sitting for long periods strengthens the spine.C. Slouching is more harmful than standing.D. People should avoid all types of sitting.Q5. What is the main idea of the passage?A. Slouching is the proven main cause of chronic back pain.B. People should always sit upright to stay healthy.C. Perfect posture is essential for emotional stability.D. Posture may matter less than movement in maintaining back health.Part II. TRANSCRIPTIs slouching really that bad for us? We hear family members and teachers telling us to “sit up straight” and “stand tall”, but do they say that because an erect posture is more aesthetically pleasing, or is it the key to a pain-free back? It’s commonly believed that ‘slump’ sitting or ‘slouch’ standing damages our spines. But is slouching really that bad?erect adj. 挺直的slump v. 瘫坐下slouch v. 无精打采地站(或坐、走);低头垂肩地站(或坐、走)spine n. 脊柱;脊椎(Q1) Meghan Markowski, physiotherapist at Harvard-affiliated Brigham and Women’s Hospital, says that poor posture can lead to neck pain and back problems. She also links it to other problems like poor balance, headaches, and breathing difficulties. Meghan says we should aim for an upright spine position and avoid flexing and arching our backs. But if you’re a sloucher, there may be some good news coming from the last two decades of research.physiotherapist n. 物理治疗师flex v. 弯曲(关节或肌肉)In an article called “Sit Up Straight: Time to Re-evaluate”, (Q2) physiotherapist Diane Slater and colleagues review the current research and conclude that there is no strong evidence that slouching aggravates back pain, or even that a perfect posture exists. Instead, they argue that differences in our spinal curvatures are a fact of life, and that our backs are stronger than we think.aggravate v. 使(病情、问题等)恶化;加剧curvature n. 弯曲,曲度So, we’re not sure that slouching causes back pain, but have you ever felt like slouching puts you in a worse mood? (Q3) A 2014 study by Johannes Michalak and colleagues found that depressed participants in a slumped seated position remembered more negative words than positive, but this improved once they sat upright. That means that the way we sit might make us feel more negative. Should we sit up straight and stand tall then?(Q4) Something both sides seem to agree on is that we should avoid staying in one static posture throughout the day – we should change positions and stretch. (Q5) The human spine is designed to be on the move, and a sedentary lifestyle can increase the risk of back pain. If you’re unable to do this, slouching in front of your computer all day may cause you discomfort, but the evidence tells us it’s not actually damaging your spine.static adj. 静止的;静态的sedentary adj. 久坐的;需要久坐的Part III. KEYQ1. B.【解析】细节题。题目出处为:“Meghan Markowski, physiotherapist at Harvard-affiliated Brigham and Women’s Hospital, says that poor posture can lead to neck pain and back problems.” 意为:“哈佛大学附属布莱根妇女医院的物理治疗师梅根·马尔科夫斯基表示,不良姿势可能导致颈部疼痛和背部问题。”该句明确指出不良姿势带来的健康后果,因此正确答案为B。Q2. C.【解析】细节题。题目出处为:“…physiotherapist Diane Slater and colleagues review the current research and conclude that there is no strong evidence that slouching aggravates back pain, or even that a perfect posture exists.” 意为:“物理治疗师黛安·斯莱特及其同事回顾当前研究并得出结论:没有有力证据表明萎靡驼背的姿态会加重背痛,甚至没有证据表明存在完美姿势。”该句直接给出研究结论,因此答案为C。Q3. C.【解析】细节题。题目出处为:“A 2014 study by Johannes Michalak and colleagues found that depressed participants in a slumped seated position remembered more negative words than positive, but this improved once they sat upright.” 意为:“约翰内斯·米哈拉克及同事在2014年的研究发现,抑郁参与者在萎靡驼背的坐姿下记住的负面词比正面词更多,但当他们坐直后情况有所改善。”这说明含不良姿势影响情绪记忆,因此正确答案为C。Q4. A.【解析】推理题。题目出处为:“Something both sides seem to agree on is that we should avoid staying in one static posture throughout the day – we should change positions and stretch. The human spine is designed to be on the move, and a sedentary lifestyle can increase the risk of back pain.” 意为:“双方似乎都同意,我们应避免整天一动不动——而是应改变姿势并伸展身体。人体脊柱本就是为了活动而设计,久坐的生活方式会增加背痛风险。” 由此可推断,规律性活动有助于减少背痛风险,因此答案为A。Q5. D.【解析】主旨题。题目出处为:“The human spine is designed to be on the move, and a sedentary lifestyle can increase the risk of back pain. If you’re unable to do this, slouching in front of your computer all day may cause you discomfort, but the evidence tells us it’s not actually damaging your spine.” 意为:“人体脊柱本就是为了活动而设计,久坐会增加背痛风险。如果你做不到在这一点,一整天在电脑前萎靡驼背的姿态就可能会让你不舒服,但证据显示,这并不会真正损害你的脊椎。”全文核心观点即:姿势不是唯一重要因素,规律活动比保持“完美姿势”更关键,因此正确答案为D。(本文图片来源于摄图网,版权归摄图网所有)

新闻听力 | 我们为什么喜欢吃辣?

我们为什么喜欢吃辣?Why do we eat spicy food? 常速 | 七级(偏易) | 368词| 3min7s刘立军供稿Part I. QUESTIONSListen to the passage and choose the best answer to each question you hear.Q1. What chemical compound in chili peppers is responsible for the burning sensation?A. Capsaicin.B. Endorphin.C. Serotonin.D. Glucose.Q2. According to the passage, what happens when the body detects capsaicin?A. The body temperature rises significantly.B. The body releases endorphins to reduce the perceived pain.C. The taste buds become permanently less sensitive.D. The digestive system immediately breaks down the compound.Q3. Why does Dr. Tamara Rosenbaum say people consciously choose to eat spicy foods?A. They want to build tolerance to hotter flavors.B. They associate chili with traditional cooking methods.C. They understand the burning sensation does not actually harm them.D. They believe it improves their digestive health.Q4. What can be inferred about early human cultivation of chili peppers?A. People cultivated chilies mainly to increase their sweetness.B. Chili peppers naturally evolved without human influence.C. Humans preferred peppers that required minimal cooking.D. Human cultivation altered traits such as color, size, and capsaicin level.Q5. What is the main idea of the passage?A. Capsaicin is dangerous and should be avoided in a typical diet.B. Humans enjoy spicy food due to a combination of factors.C. Spicy food consumption has decreased significantly in modern times.D. Only certain cultures have historically eaten chili peppers.Part II. TRANSCRIPTWhy do we eat spicy food? You know the feeling – your ears start to warm up, your tongue goes numb, you start sweating and taking deep breaths. You’ve just eaten something spicy, knowing it would be painful, and yet, you chose to do it anyway. Are humans just masochistic, or is there something else going on? The answer lies in both science and history.masochistic adj. 有受虐倾向的Let’s start with the science. Spicy isn’t actually a taste like salty, sweet, sour, and bitter – it’s a sensation. (Q1) This sensation is triggered by a chemical compound found in chili peppers called ‘capsaicin’. When we eat foods containing capsaicin, our bodies are tricked into thinking the temperature is actually rising. (Q2) In trying to temper the burning sensation, our bodies release endorphins which control pain and, at the same time, give a feeling of pleasure – like painkillers.capsaicin n. 辣椒素endorphin n. 内啡肽This is what is happening chemically, but there is also a conscious side to choosing spicy food. Dr. Tamara Rosenbaum, Cognitive Neuroscientist at the National Autonomous University of Mexico, explains in an interview with the BBC that (Q3) this is because we are rational beings – we know that the burning sensation of chili does not physically harm us. Furthermore, we derive pleasure from the other ingredients chili is generally cooked and eaten with – including fat, sugar, and salt. So – like skydiving – eating chili is a form of thrill-seeking or ‘benign masochism’, where we get pleasure from a seemingly negative sensation.masochism n. 受虐倾向This masochistic relationship with capsaicin has been a long one, starting in the Andes of South America, where chili peppers originate. Humans were one of the few mammals on Earth that developed a taste for capsaicin. So, archaeological evidence suggests they started cultivating chili peppers about six thousand years ago. (Q4) Human intervention changed the chili pepper to suit human tastes and needs – including the pepper’s colour, size, and capsaicin content – helping to explain the many different types of chili peppers now available.Fast-forward to today, and our love affair with the chili pepper is going strong. We eat around 57.3 million tons of peppers globally each year, and chili is a key ingredient in traditional dishes from Mexico to Korea. (Q5) Maybe we are masochistic after all.Part III. KEYQ1.A.【解析】本题为细节题。题目出处为:“This sensation is triggered by a chemical compound found in chili peppers called ‘capsaicin’.” 意为:“这种灼烧感由辣椒中一种被称为‘辣椒素’的化合物引起。”根据这句话可以推理,导致灼烧感的成分是capsaicin,因此答案为A。Q2.B.【解析】本题为细节题。题目出处为:“In trying to temper the burning sensation, our bodies release endorphins which control pain and, at the same time, give a feeling of pleasure.”意为:“为了缓解灼烧感,身体会释放控制疼痛并带来愉悦感的内啡肽。”因此答案为B。Q3.C.【解析】本题为细节题。题目出处为:“… this is because we are rational beings – we know that the burning sensation of chili does not physically harm us.”意为:“这是因为我们是理性生物,我们知道辣椒带来的灼烧感并不会真正伤害身体。”由此推断,人们选择吃辣是因为他们明白灼烧感并不会造成实际伤害,因此答案为C。Q4.D.【解析】本题为推理题。题目出处为:Human intervention changed the chili pepper to suit human tastes and needs – including the pepper’s color, size, and capsaicin content. 意为:人类的干预改变了辣椒,使其更符合人类的口味和需求,包括其颜色、大小和辣椒素含量。根据这句话可以推理,人类早期的栽培活动确实改变了辣椒的特性,因此答案为D。Q5.B.【解析】本题为主旨题。文章解释了辣椒素触发的化学反应、人类明知无害仍追求刺激的心理机制、“良性受虐”的行为模式、辣椒的历史起源与栽培发展脉络等等。文章最后写道:“Maybe we are masochistic after all.(或许我们还是有受虐倾向。)”,展示人类对于辛辣的复杂喜好。由此可见,主旨是人类对辛辣食物的喜爱由多重因素共同决定,答案为B。 (本文图片来源于摄图网,版权归摄图网所有)

新闻听力 | 人类是否应该尝试与外星人建立联系?

人类是否应该尝试与外星人建立联系?Should We Try to Communicate with Aliens?常速| 五级(中等)| 879词| 5min12s刘立军供稿Part I. QUESTIONSListen to the passage and choose the best answer to each question you hear.Q1. According to the passage, what is the main purpose of SETI?A. To stop the spread of radiation from Earth into outer space.B. To look for signs of intelligent life in the Universe.C. To train astronauts to communicate with aliens.D. To record natural radio waves from distant stars.Q2. What does Douglas Vakoch’s organization METI mainly propose?A. Listening to alien signals more carefully.B. Sending messages from Earth to outer space.C. Avoiding contact with civilizations that might be hostile.D. Developing stronger satellites for communication.Q3. What example did Stephen Hawking use to warn against contacting aliens?A. The extinction of many native species after foreign invasions.B. The wars caused by miscommunication between nations.C. The tragic experience of Native Americans when Columbus arrived.D. The failure of early attempts to decode radio signals.Q4. What does Douglas Vakoch mean by saying “We’re trying to be the galactic giraffes here.”?A. Humans want to show their intelligence to possible alien observers.B. Aliens may have already established secret contact with humans.C. The Universe is too vast for successful communication.D. Alien civilizations probably understand our attention-seeking behavior.Q5. What is the main idea of the passage?A. Space communication between planets may never be possible.B. Humans have already received signals from extraterrestrial civilizations.C. Alien contact would be extremely dangerous for human society.D. Scientists are debating whether humans should actively contact alien life.Part II. TRANSCRIPTShould We Try to Communicate with Aliens?Star 1: Hello? Star 2: Can you hear us?Star 1: I can hear you. Can you hear me?Star 2: Hello?Echoing: Is there anybody out there?Narrator: Well, that’s the question, isn’t it? Has been for as long as anyone can remember. Are we alone? It might sound like science fiction, but the Universe is so vast. Many scientists think it’s unrealistic to imagine we’re the only form of life in it. Alien life may also be what we would consider intelligent. But as the physicist Enrico Fermi asked in 1950, if we’re not alone, where is everybody?Mike Garrett: The Universe is full of natural radio waves generated by stars, and planets, and galaxies. But that emission is really very smooth.Narrator: (Q1) That’s Mike Garrett, an astrophysicist and active member of SETI—the Search for Extra Terrestrial Intelligence.astrophysics n. 天体物理学terrestrial adj. 地球的Mike Garrett: Artificial radio waves are very spiky because they convey information. So we’re looking for anomalies—the signature of potentially other intelligent civilizations out there, broadcasting to the Universe.spiky adj. 成锥形的anomaly n. 异常现象Douglas Vakoch: What SETI assumes is that the aliens are very motivated, that they’re going out of their way to send us intentional signals for our benefit.Narrator: (Q2) And that’s Douglas Vakoch, the founder of METI, which stands for Messaging Extra Terrestrial Intelligence. They think listening is not enough.Douglas Vakoch: Maybe we should do the heavy lifting by reaching out first. I mean, someone has to take the first move.Narrator: Making the first move in any relationship has its risks—opening oneself up to rejection, or worse. Stories of alien fleets visiting Earth with the sole intention of wiping us out are common ground for science fiction. But there is a theory that, if we’re not careful, this could become science fact.Mike Garrett: (Q3) I think one of the things that Stephen Hawking, famous cosmologist, said about this idea of transmitting signals is that it might not turn out very well for us here on this planet, just like it didn’t turn out very well for the Native Americans when Columbus first settled there.cosmologist n. 宇宙学家Narrator: But METI is amongst those who see this argument as a red herring.red herring 指转移注意力之物Douglas Vakoch: It’s too late to hide. We’re already known in the Universe.Narrator: Douglas and his colleagues believe that, through TV and radio broadcasts—not to mention mobile phone towers—Earth has been leaking radiation into space for decades. This “leakage” is exactly what SETI looks for as signs of life elsewhere, so it stands to reason that, if aliens are listening, they could probably already hear us. One theory, known as the Zoo Hypothesis, is that aliens already know we exist. But rather than making contact, they’re studying us from afar—as if we were animals in a zoo. (Q4) Douglas thinks that by sending out regular messages, we can demonstrate both our intelligence and desire to communicate.afar adv. 在远处Douglas Vakoch: If you imagine we go to the zoo and we’re walking around and we see a bunch of giraffes, what happens if one of them turns around, looks us in the eye, and starts pounding out a series of prime numbers with its hoof? We’re trying to be the galactic giraffes here.pound v. 连续重击prime number 质数,素数hoof n. 蹄galactic adj. 银河的,星系的Narrator: But for SETI and Mike, this remains problematic. Though not against communicating per se, Mike argues that we need to think much more carefully about what we want to say and how we want to say it.Mike Garrett: Who speaks for Earth? And who has the right? When I see a lot of these signals being sent, they don’t represent all of this planet. You know, just arbitrarily sending signals out into space is not very democratic.Narrator: If humans were to enter a dialogue with an alien species, how would we get them to understand us? This is more than a language barrier. It’s a fundamental difference barrier. Because of the enormous distances involved, we’re also dealing in difficult timescales. If we send a message to a life form 1,000 light years away, it will take 1,000 years to reach them. And assuming their technology is similar to ours, we’d wait another 1,000 years for the reply.Douglas Vakoch: It’s almost like you get an email from someone ten years ago and they say, “Yes, sounds great.” But you don’t even remember what it was about. This only works if it’s something embraced by generations to come. Narrator: The first message sent into space for the benefit of aliens was in 1974—more than 50 years ago. It became known as the Arecibo Message. And so far, we have received nothing in return, which returns us to Enrico Fermi’s question—“Where is everybody?” METI will continue reaching out to those planets that orbit within what’s known as the “Goldilocks Zone”—not too hot, not too cold—just right for potential life. Meanwhile, Mike and SETI will keep an ear to the sky, advancing techniques to pick up signals from other worlds. And maybe one day, just maybe...Mike Garrett: If we detect a signal and we know that we’re not alone in the Universe, I think that should make people happy. If we discover another civilization and they’re very different from us, we’ll realize actually how similar we are to our neighbors.Part III. KEYQ1.B.【解析】细节题。题目出处为:“That’s Mike Garrett, an astrophysicist and active member of SETI—the Search for Extra Terrestrial Intelligence.”意为:“这是迈克·加勒特,他是SETI(搜寻地外智能生命组织)的成员。”因此正确答案为B。Q2.B.【解析】细节题。题目出处为:“That’s Douglas Vakoch, the founder of METI, which stands for Messaging Extra Terrestrial Intelligence. They think listening is not enough.” 意为:“道格拉斯·瓦科赫是METI的创始人,METI意为‘向地外智能生命传递信息’。他们认为仅仅倾听是不够的。”因此正确答案为B。Q3.C.【解析】细节题。题目出处为:“... one of the things that Stephen Hawking, famous cosmologist, said about this idea of transmitting signals is that it might not turn out very well for us here on this planet—just like it didn’t turn out very well for the Native Americans when Columbus first settled there.” 意为:“……著名宇宙学家史蒂芬·霍金指出,主动发射信号的结果可能对人类而言并不好——就像哥伦布抵达美洲后印第安人的命运一样。”这一比喻警示人类主动联系外星生命或将带来不可控的风险,因此正确答案为C。Q4.A.【解析】推理题。在对话中,叙述者说:“Douglas thinks that by sending out regular messages, we can demonstrate both our intelligence and desire to communicate.(道格拉斯认为,通过定期向外发送信息,我们可以展示自己的智慧以及沟通的意愿。)” 接着,Douglas Vakoch进一步解释道:“If you imagine we go to the zoo and we’re walking around and we see a bunch of giraffes, what happens if one of them turns around, looks us in the eye and starts pounding out a series of prime numbers with its hoof? We’re trying to be the galactic giraffes here.” 大意是:如果我们在动物园看到一群长颈鹿,而其中一只转过身来,望向我们,并用蹄子敲出质数序列,这意味着什么?Douglas借此比喻说明,人类也在试图扮演银河系中“长颈鹿”的角色,主动发送规律性的信号,向可能存在的外星生命展示我们的智慧与沟通意愿。因此正确答案为A。Q5.D.【解析】主旨题。文章由旁白引出核心问题“Should we try to communicate with aliens?”并介绍了两个研究组织及其立场差异:SETI(Search for Extra Terrestrial Intelligence)专注寻找外太空智能生命信号;而METI(Messaging Extra Terrestrial Intelligence)主张人类主动向外太空发送信号。通过呈现Mike Garrett与Douglas Vakoch的不同观点,文章展示了科学界围绕“人类是否应主动与外星生命沟通”的持续争论。因此,本文的主旨是科学家正在探讨人类是否应主动尝试与外星生命建立联系,正确答案为D。(本文图片来源于摄图网,版权归摄图网所有)

新闻听力 | 萎靡驼背的姿态真的对我们有害吗?

萎靡驼背的姿态真的对我们有害吗?Is slouching really that bad for us? 常速 | 五级(中等) | 340词 | 2min13s刘立军供稿Part I. QUESTIONSListen to the passage and choose the best answer to each question you hear.Q1. What does Meghan Markowski say poor posture can lead to?A. Weight gain and muscle loss.B. Neck pain and back problems.C. Poor eyesight and hearing loss.D. Difficulty concentrating on tasks.Q2. What did Diane Slater and her colleagues conclude about slouching?A. It is the main cause of chronic diseases.B. It has been proven to damage the spine.C. There is no strong evidence that it aggravates back pain.D. It should be completely avoided at all times.Q3. What did the 2014 study by Johannes Michalak find?A. Slouching improves memory for positive words.B. Upright sitting increases physical strength.C. Slumped posture affects emotional recall.D. Good posture eliminates negative emotions.Q4. What can be inferred from the discussion about static posture?A. Moving regularly helps reduce the risk of back pain.B. Sitting for long periods strengthens the spine.C. Slouching is more harmful than standing.D. People should avoid all types of sitting.Q5. What is the main idea of the passage?A. Slouching is the proven main cause of chronic back pain.B. People should always sit upright to stay healthy.C. Perfect posture is essential for emotional stability.D. Posture may matter less than movement in maintaining back health.Part II. TRANSCRIPTIs slouching really that bad for us? We hear family members and teachers telling us to “sit up straight” and “stand tall”, but do they say that because an erect posture is more aesthetically pleasing, or is it the key to a pain-free back? It’s commonly believed that ‘slump’ sitting or ‘slouch’ standing damages our spines. But is slouching really that bad?erect adj. 挺直的slump v. 瘫坐下slouch v. 无精打采地站(或坐、走);低头垂肩地站(或坐、走)spine n. 脊柱;脊椎(Q1) Meghan Markowski, physiotherapist at Harvard-affiliated Brigham and Women’s Hospital, says that poor posture can lead to neck pain and back problems. She also links it to other problems like poor balance, headaches, and breathing difficulties. Meghan says we should aim for an upright spine position and avoid flexing and arching our backs. But if you’re a sloucher, there may be some good news coming from the last two decades of research.physiotherapist n. 物理治疗师flex v. 弯曲(关节或肌肉)In an article called “Sit Up Straight: Time to Re-evaluate”, (Q2) physiotherapist Diane Slater and colleagues review the current research and conclude that there is no strong evidence that slouching aggravates back pain, or even that a perfect posture exists. Instead, they argue that differences in our spinal curvatures are a fact of life, and that our backs are stronger than we think.aggravate v. 使(病情、问题等)恶化;加剧curvature n. 弯曲,曲度So, we’re not sure that slouching causes back pain, but have you ever felt like slouching puts you in a worse mood? (Q3) A 2014 study by Johannes Michalak and colleagues found that depressed participants in a slumped seated position remembered more negative words than positive, but this improved once they sat upright. That means that the way we sit might make us feel more negative. Should we sit up straight and stand tall then?(Q4) Something both sides seem to agree on is that we should avoid staying in one static posture throughout the day – we should change positions and stretch. (Q5) The human spine is designed to be on the move, and a sedentary lifestyle can increase the risk of back pain. If you’re unable to do this, slouching in front of your computer all day may cause you discomfort, but the evidence tells us it’s not actually damaging your spine.static adj. 静止的;静态的sedentary adj. 久坐的;需要久坐的Part III. KEYQ1. B.【解析】细节题。题目出处为:“Meghan Markowski, physiotherapist at Harvard-affiliated Brigham and Women’s Hospital, says that poor posture can lead to neck pain and back problems.” 意为:“哈佛大学附属布莱根妇女医院的物理治疗师梅根·马尔科夫斯基表示,不良姿势可能导致颈部疼痛和背部问题。”该句明确指出不良姿势带来的健康后果,因此正确答案为B。Q2. C.【解析】细节题。题目出处为:“…physiotherapist Diane Slater and colleagues review the current research and conclude that there is no strong evidence that slouching aggravates back pain, or even that a perfect posture exists.” 意为:“物理治疗师黛安·斯莱特及其同事回顾当前研究并得出结论:没有有力证据表明萎靡驼背的姿态会加重背痛,甚至没有证据表明存在完美姿势。”该句直接给出研究结论,因此答案为C。Q3. C.【解析】细节题。题目出处为:“A 2014 study by Johannes Michalak and colleagues found that depressed participants in a slumped seated position remembered more negative words than positive, but this improved once they sat upright.” 意为:“约翰内斯·米哈拉克及同事在2014年的研究发现,抑郁参与者在萎靡驼背的坐姿下记住的负面词比正面词更多,但当他们坐直后情况有所改善。”这说明含不良姿势影响情绪记忆,因此正确答案为C。Q4. A.【解析】推理题。题目出处为:“Something both sides seem to agree on is that we should avoid staying in one static posture throughout the day – we should change positions and stretch. The human spine is designed to be on the move, and a sedentary lifestyle can increase the risk of back pain.” 意为:“双方似乎都同意,我们应避免整天一动不动——而是应改变姿势并伸展身体。人体脊柱本就是为了活动而设计,久坐的生活方式会增加背痛风险。” 由此可推断,规律性活动有助于减少背痛风险,因此答案为A。Q5. D.【解析】主旨题。题目出处为:“The human spine is designed to be on the move, and a sedentary lifestyle can increase the risk of back pain. If you’re unable to do this, slouching in front of your computer all day may cause you discomfort, but the evidence tells us it’s not actually damaging your spine.” 意为:“人体脊柱本就是为了活动而设计,久坐会增加背痛风险。如果你做不到在这一点,一整天在电脑前萎靡驼背的姿态就可能会让你不舒服,但证据显示,这并不会真正损害你的脊椎。”全文核心观点即:姿势不是唯一重要因素,规律活动比保持“完美姿势”更关键,因此正确答案为D。(本文图片来源于摄图网,版权归摄图网所有)

新闻听力 | 我们为什么喜欢吃辣?

我们为什么喜欢吃辣?Why do we eat spicy food? 常速 | 七级(偏易) | 368词| 3min7s刘立军供稿Part I. QUESTIONSListen to the passage and choose the best answer to each question you hear.Q1. What chemical compound in chili peppers is responsible for the burning sensation?A. Capsaicin.B. Endorphin.C. Serotonin.D. Glucose.Q2. According to the passage, what happens when the body detects capsaicin?A. The body temperature rises significantly.B. The body releases endorphins to reduce the perceived pain.C. The taste buds become permanently less sensitive.D. The digestive system immediately breaks down the compound.Q3. Why does Dr. Tamara Rosenbaum say people consciously choose to eat spicy foods?A. They want to build tolerance to hotter flavors.B. They associate chili with traditional cooking methods.C. They understand the burning sensation does not actually harm them.D. They believe it improves their digestive health.Q4. What can be inferred about early human cultivation of chili peppers?A. People cultivated chilies mainly to increase their sweetness.B. Chili peppers naturally evolved without human influence.C. Humans preferred peppers that required minimal cooking.D. Human cultivation altered traits such as color, size, and capsaicin level.Q5. What is the main idea of the passage?A. Capsaicin is dangerous and should be avoided in a typical diet.B. Humans enjoy spicy food due to a combination of factors.C. Spicy food consumption has decreased significantly in modern times.D. Only certain cultures have historically eaten chili peppers.Part II. TRANSCRIPTWhy do we eat spicy food? You know the feeling – your ears start to warm up, your tongue goes numb, you start sweating and taking deep breaths. You’ve just eaten something spicy, knowing it would be painful, and yet, you chose to do it anyway. Are humans just masochistic, or is there something else going on? The answer lies in both science and history.masochistic adj. 有受虐倾向的Let’s start with the science. Spicy isn’t actually a taste like salty, sweet, sour, and bitter – it’s a sensation. (Q1) This sensation is triggered by a chemical compound found in chili peppers called ‘capsaicin’. When we eat foods containing capsaicin, our bodies are tricked into thinking the temperature is actually rising. (Q2) In trying to temper the burning sensation, our bodies release endorphins which control pain and, at the same time, give a feeling of pleasure – like painkillers.capsaicin n. 辣椒素endorphin n. 内啡肽This is what is happening chemically, but there is also a conscious side to choosing spicy food. Dr. Tamara Rosenbaum, Cognitive Neuroscientist at the National Autonomous University of Mexico, explains in an interview with the BBC that (Q3) this is because we are rational beings – we know that the burning sensation of chili does not physically harm us. Furthermore, we derive pleasure from the other ingredients chili is generally cooked and eaten with – including fat, sugar, and salt. So – like skydiving – eating chili is a form of thrill-seeking or ‘benign masochism’, where we get pleasure from a seemingly negative sensation.masochism n. 受虐倾向This masochistic relationship with capsaicin has been a long one, starting in the Andes of South America, where chili peppers originate. Humans were one of the few mammals on Earth that developed a taste for capsaicin. So, archaeological evidence suggests they started cultivating chili peppers about six thousand years ago. (Q4) Human intervention changed the chili pepper to suit human tastes and needs – including the pepper’s colour, size, and capsaicin content – helping to explain the many different types of chili peppers now available.Fast-forward to today, and our love affair with the chili pepper is going strong. We eat around 57.3 million tons of peppers globally each year, and chili is a key ingredient in traditional dishes from Mexico to Korea. (Q5) Maybe we are masochistic after all.Part III. KEYQ1.A.【解析】本题为细节题。题目出处为:“This sensation is triggered by a chemical compound found in chili peppers called ‘capsaicin’.” 意为:“这种灼烧感由辣椒中一种被称为‘辣椒素’的化合物引起。”根据这句话可以推理,导致灼烧感的成分是capsaicin,因此答案为A。Q2.B.【解析】本题为细节题。题目出处为:“In trying to temper the burning sensation, our bodies release endorphins which control pain and, at the same time, give a feeling of pleasure.”意为:“为了缓解灼烧感,身体会释放控制疼痛并带来愉悦感的内啡肽。”因此答案为B。Q3.C.【解析】本题为细节题。题目出处为:“… this is because we are rational beings – we know that the burning sensation of chili does not physically harm us.”意为:“这是因为我们是理性生物,我们知道辣椒带来的灼烧感并不会真正伤害身体。”由此推断,人们选择吃辣是因为他们明白灼烧感并不会造成实际伤害,因此答案为C。Q4.D.【解析】本题为推理题。题目出处为:Human intervention changed the chili pepper to suit human tastes and needs – including the pepper’s color, size, and capsaicin content. 意为:人类的干预改变了辣椒,使其更符合人类的口味和需求,包括其颜色、大小和辣椒素含量。根据这句话可以推理,人类早期的栽培活动确实改变了辣椒的特性,因此答案为D。Q5.B.【解析】本题为主旨题。文章解释了辣椒素触发的化学反应、人类明知无害仍追求刺激的心理机制、“良性受虐”的行为模式、辣椒的历史起源与栽培发展脉络等等。文章最后写道:“Maybe we are masochistic after all.(或许我们还是有受虐倾向。)”,展示人类对于辛辣的复杂喜好。由此可见,主旨是人类对辛辣食物的喜爱由多重因素共同决定,答案为B。 (本文图片来源于摄图网,版权归摄图网所有)

新闻听力 | 美国参议员史蒂夫·戴恩斯访问中国讨论双边问题

美国参议员史蒂夫·戴恩斯访问中国讨论双边问题US Senator Steve Daines Visits China to Discuss Bilateral Issues常速 | 六级(易)| 156 | 1min07s刘立军供稿Part I. QUESTIONSListen to the news and choose the best answer to each question you hear.Q1. When did Senator Steve Daines attend a meeting at the Capitol?A. February 25, 2025 B. February 26, 2025 C. February 27, 2025 D. February 28, 2025 Q2. What did Mao Ning emphasize about China-US relations?A. They should focus on trade tariffs. B. They benefit both nations when stable and healthy. C. They require frequent visits from Congress members. D. They should prioritize agricultural cooperation. Q3. What is the main idea of Mao Ning’s remarks at the Beijing press briefing?A. China supports sustainable China-US relations. B. China opposes tariffs imposed by the US. C. China encourages agricultural trade with Montana. D. China prioritizes visits from American officials. Q4. Why did the US impose tariffs on Chinese imports?A. To address environmental concerns. B. To promote cultural exchanges. C. To improve agricultural trade. D. To respond to the fentanyl issue. Q5. What topics did Senator Daines plan to discuss during his visit to China?A. Preventing fentanyl production and reducing trade tariffs. B. Increasing agricultural exports and resolving political disputes. C. Reducing the trade deficit and improving market access. D. Addressing mutual concerns and promoting cultural exchanges. Part II. TRANSCRIPTUS Senator Steve Daines Visits China to Discuss Bilateral Issues(Q1) US Senator Steve Daines (Republican, Montana) attended a meeting with Senate Republicans and White House Chief of Staff Susie Wiles at the Capitol on February 26, 2025. senator n. 参议员 (Q2) China’s Foreign Ministry spokeswoman Mao Ning welcomed Senator Daines’ visit to China, emphasizing that a stable and healthy China-US relationship benefits both nations.ministry n. 部,部委 (Q3) At a Beijing press briefing, Mao expressed China’s openness to visits from Americans, including members of Congress, and highlighted the importance of steady and sustainable China-US ties.brief v. 向……简要说明 (Q4) Daines arrived in Beijing on Thursday, shortly after the US imposed tariffs on Chinese imports, citing the fentanyl issue.fentanyl n. 芬太尼(一种药物) (Q5) The senator stated on social media that his discussions in China would focus on curbing fentanyl production, reducing the trade deficit, and ensuring fair market access for Montana’s agricultural producers.When asked about these topics, Mao reiterated China’s stance on addressing mutual concerns through dialogue based on equality and respect.reiterate v. 重申,反复强调 Part III. KEYQ1. B.【解析】细节题。根据“US Senator Steve Daines (Republican, Montana) attended a meeting with Senate Republicans and White House Chief of Staff Susie Wiles at the Capitol on February 26, 2025.”,可知美国参议员史蒂夫·戴恩斯于2025年2月26日在国会大厦出席会议。因此,正确答案为B。Q2. B.【解析】细节题。根据“China’s Foreign Ministry spokeswoman Mao Ning welcomed Senator Daines’ visit to China, emphasizing that a stable and healthy China-US relationship benefits both nations.”,可知中国外交部发言人毛宁欢迎戴恩斯参议员访问中国,并强调稳定健康的中美关系对两国都有益。因此,正确答案为B。Q3. A.【解析】主旨题。根据“At a Beijing press briefing, Mao expressed China’s openness to visits from Americans, including members of Congress, and highlighted the importance of steady and sustainable China-US ties.”,可知在北京的新闻发布会上,毛宁表达了中国对包括国会议员在内的美国人访问的开放态度,并强调了稳定可持续的中美关系的重要性。因此,正确答案为A。Q4. D.【解析】推理题。根据“Daines arrived in Beijing on Thursday, shortly after the US imposed tariffs on Chinese imports, citing the fentanyl issue.”,可知美国以芬太尼问题为由对中国进口商品征收关税。因此,正确答案为D。Q5. C.【解析】细节题。根据“The senator stated on social media that his discussions in China would focus on curbing fentanyl production, reducing the trade deficit, and ensuring fair market access for Montana’s agricultural producers.”,可知戴恩斯议员在中国的讨论将围绕3个议题展开:遏制芬太尼生产、减少贸易逆差、确保蒙大拿州农业生产者的公平市场准入。因此,正确答案为C。(本文图片来源于摄图网,版权归摄图网所有)

第12届教学大赛商务英语组特等奖潘紫萌授课

授课点评:潘紫萌老师在本次大赛中与来自全国各地的商务英语优秀教师展开激烈角逐,在教学理念、教学方法、课堂设计、英语素质、商务知识、教姿教态、师生互动等方面的表现都较突出,最后以总分第一荣获特等奖。潘老师以准确的英语发音先声夺人,丰富的表达方式、适中的语调语速和端庄的教姿教态也令人印象深刻。在课程设计环节,为实现其教学目标,她选择business ethics作为主题,介绍了教学目标、学生特征、以学生为中心和以产出为导向的教学理念,以及线上线下结合、传统和高科技媒体结合等丰富多彩的教学方式。这份介绍全面立体但简明扼要,为后面的演示(demo)课提供了一个很好的支撑。由于大赛的授课时间有限,潘老师突出重点,在演示课上只展示教学方案的第三步,即participatory learning 1 和 post assessment 1。她采用BOPPPS(bridge in, objectives, pre-assessment, participatory learning, post assessment, summary)模型,通过德国大众汽车减排作假、中国支付宝公益植树项目等案例,教学目标涵盖商务英语知识、技能、以及相关的伦理和价值观等。在短短的十几分钟里要达到这么多项教学目标绝非易事。潘老师通过一系列的短视频、多种教学方法(如听力填空、案例讨论、汉译英、样本对话补正等)以及活泼的师生互动,较好地实现了教学目标,显示出选手突出的课堂组织能力。商务英语教学起源于英美等国,因此基本使用本国素材、讲本国故事。传入中国后,主要使用外国素材、讲外国故事。令人欣喜的是,潘老师注意突出中国特色,多次引用中国案例,讲授中国故事,传播中国价值观。加上她出色的英语基本功和良好的师生互动,使得教学过程十分流畅,也没有不同文化同场展示的违和感。总而言之,潘紫萌老师在授课环节的各方面表现都很优秀。不足之处当然也有。首先, 8’13’’开始的讨论过于仓促,只有18秒, 8’31’’就结束了。由于讨论不充分,在随后的问答环节中,更多的回答似乎来自老师而不是学生。第二个是要增加教学过程的自然自发 (spontaneity)。不知是因为课前多次排练还是老师特意要求,学生的产出只有一次对话(17’40’’)相对自然,其他的多次回答虽准确无误,但都像中国小学生朗读课文或回答问题,语音、语调、语速都过于整齐合一,这不利于培养学生的英语实际表达能力。点评专家:陈准民

第12届教学大赛商务英语组二等奖贺静授课

授课点评:贺静老师授课效果较好,教学目标清楚、教学方法得当、教学程序井井有条。此外,贺静老师口齿清晰,语音语调比较纯正、流利;教态端庄自然,有亲和力,教学过程中与学生互动良好,体现了以学生为主体,教师为主导的教学原则。授课分两部分。第一部分介绍该单元(Empire of Wealth)的总教学安排,用了3分30秒,时间把握得比较好。另外,设计的PPT形式多样,各种图表清楚展现了教学安排。授课开始的第三分钟,PPT显示的该单元总教学目标及三篇课文的教学目标一览无遗,加上贺静老师的阐释,清晰地传递了教学目标和学习目标,这能帮助学生在课堂内外围绕主题有效学习。紧接着,贺静老师借助PPT上的流程图比较详细地介绍了授课课文In Praise of Competitive Urges的教学安排,其中的Problem-centred教学方法对学生发现、分析和解决问题有很大帮助。之后进入第二部分:比赛授课阶段。第二部分具体授课含四个阶段。进入第一阶段Warm-up时,贺静老师显得有点紧张,但很快就调整好了状态。该阶段有教师对课文理解的提问,请学生从课文中找到相关的依据回答问题,这种做法本来值得称道,因为授课不能离开课文。但是,Warm-up阶段是课前准备阶段,因此,贺静老师在Warm-up阶段讲解课文不妥,建议把重点放在教材中的Warm-up Activities上,适当设计一些附加的活动,才符合教学逻辑。此外,在总时间为20分钟且第一阶段用了3分30秒的情况下,Warm-up阶段用了5分1秒显得有点过长。之后是第二阶段Questionnaire Results,贺静老师分析解释了调查表中的信息,谈了自己对问题的看法,期间激励学生思考、回答问题,这对培养学生的独立思考能力及理解课文非常有益。Questionnaire之后进入授课第三阶段:Wealth-flaunting Motivations / Summarizing。炫富动机是课文包含的核心内容之一。因此,讨论炫富动机有助于学生理解课文。教师要求学生从PPT上(视频13')显示的课文段落寻找答案,并要求学生做pair work找到有关的词汇。另外,通过分析课文的修辞寓意,贺静老师阐释了文章作者的真实目的。这一点做得很好。另一方面,根据该单元内容,所授的是“综合商务英语”课程。因此,贺静老师应更多围绕语言难点、篇章结构、写作风格、文法修辞等方面进行解释,让学生对课文有更深层次的理解。第四阶段Assignment在视频18'15"开始。课后作业包括questionnaire设计、调研报告写作、相关阅读作业。这样较好兼顾了综合商务英语课程语言学习和商务实践的教学特点。建议更多以教材内容教学为主,重视语言、篇章教学,在帮助学生充分理解课文的前提下掌握一些商务知识和技能;需要结合课文融入更多的思政教育内容。点评专家:翁凤翔

教育培训更多

大语言模型赋能外语教学与研究系列课程

@上外@上纽大@2026年暑期教学设计工作坊

一、课程描述Grounded in the principles of ExperientialLearning Theory, this three-day workshop guides college English instructorsfrom essential theoretical perspectives to hands-on approaches for designingeffective EAP courses in colleges and universities. Beginning with a review ofkey learner-based learning theories, attendees explore student-centeredprinciples for integrated listening/speaking and reading/writing course design,with particular attention to active learning and communicative engagement.Attendees then consider how experiential learning can inform inquiry-driven EAP course design, especially theuse of English as a medium for disciplinary exploration. Following a structuredreview and guided preparation, attendees collaborate in groups to presentcourse design projects that demonstrate their reconceptualized student-centeredpedagogy. Together, these sessions offer a coherent, practice‑oriented pathwayfor instructors seeking to integrate student‑centered and experiential learningframeworks into EAP curriculum development. Handouts are provided, and active participationis anticipated.二、课程目标1. Attendees will explore key learner‑basedlearning theories, including Experiential Learning Theory, to establish atheoretical foundation for student‑centered EAP course design.2. Attendees will apply student‑centeredprinciples to the design of integrated listening/speaking and reading/writingcourses, with an emphasis on active learning and communicative engagement, aswell as EAP courses in which English serves as a medium for disciplinaryexploration.3. Attendees will reflect on and refinetheir instructional practices to better integrate experiential and student‑centeredlearning frameworks into EAP curriculum development.三、活动流程7/16 14:00-21:00 SISU HongkouArrival & Register7/17 08:30-08:40 SISU HongkouOpening Ceremony7/17 08:40-11:40 SISU HongkouApproaches to English Language Teaching: A Historical PerspectiveLanguage Competence vs. Content Competence:Redefining Academic English ProficiencyToward a Renewed Pedagogy for English Literature,Business English, and Translation Studies Course Design7/17 14:00-17:00 SISU HongkouReading, Writing, Thinking, and Communicating: A Pedagogical Framework and Practical Strategies7/18 08:40-11:40 NYU ShanghaiReimagining the English Classroom: A Humanities-Centered Approach to Literature Education7/18 14:00-17:00 NYU ShanghaiReimagining the English Classroom: A Context-Driven Approach to Business English7/19 08:40-11:40 SISU HongkouReview and ReflectionPreparation for the Course Design Project Case Analysis by Judges of the 15th SFLEP National Foreign Language Teaching Contest7/19 14:00-17:00 SISU HongkouCourse Design Project PresentationsClosing Remarks and Certificate Ceremony7/20Departure四、专家介绍1. John LiangDr. John Liang is a Clinical Professor ofTESOL and Director of the MA TESOL program at NYU Shanghai. He is deeplycommitted to advancing the theory and practice of language education and topreparing future teachers to become reflective, principled, and professionallyengaged language educators. Prior to joining NYU Shanghai, Dr. Liang served for26 years in the United States as an ESL program coordinator and second languageteacher educator. He has received CATESOL’s Pearson Longman Spirit of TeachingAward, an award in recognition of excellence in English language teaching, andthe Sadae Iwataki Award, a lifetime achievement honor for outstanding serviceto CATESOL.An active practitioner‑researcher, Dr.Liang has published in journals such asINTESOL JournalandCATESOLJournaland contributed chapters to edited volumes published by PeterLang, Routledge, and Cambridge Scholars. His academic and professional workspans grammar pedagogy, ESL materials development, second language reading andwriting, and language assessment. Across these areas, he brings a sustainedcommitment to bridging research and practice and to supporting teachers’lifelong professional growth.2. Zhang MengDr. Zhang Meng is a Clinical AssociateProfessor of English for Academic Purposes (EAP) at NYU Shanghai, an AdjunctProfessor of Education at Shanghai Jiaotong University, and Associate Editor ofthe International Journal of EAP. Dr. Zhang has extensive experience designingand teaching EAP and ESL courses in both China and the U.S., working withstudents from diverse linguistic and cultural backgrounds. Her researchinterests include second language speaking and writing, academic socialization,and design-based research methodology. Her work has been published inprestigious journals such asTESOL QuarterlyandtheInternational Journal of Educational Research.Beyond academia, Dr.Zhang is a public speaker and creative writer. She has delivered talks at TEDx2022 and various library events in Shanghai. Her books,I Confess(poetryand prose) andRains in the Sixteen(poetry and prose), werepublished by the China Federation of Literary and Art Circles Publishing Housein 2023 and 2007, respectively.五、学术支持1.About NYU Shanghai上海纽约大学成立于2012年,是经教育部批准,在上海市及浦东新区政府大力支持下,由华东师范大学和纽约大学合作创办的中国第一所中美合办研究型大学,也是纽约大学全球体系中具有学位授予资格的三大校园之一。上海纽约大学立足中国面向世界,依托纽约大学的先进教育理念和优质教育资源,致力于奉献卓越的教学、科研和社会服务,成为中国高等教育改革中具有变革意义的“试验田”,培养学生成为具有国际视野、跨文化沟通能力及创新能力的世界公民。2. About NYU Steinhardt Joint MA TESOL Program上海纽约大学的英语教育硕士项目(MA TESOL)由上海纽约大学与全美教育学院排名前十的纽约大学斯坦哈特文化教育和人类发展学院合作开设,为在职英语教师及专业人士提供与斯坦哈特学院常规英语教育硕士项目不同的培养模式,全英文授课,为时两年。秋季和春季学期期间,学员以非全日制方式在上海纽约大学校园及线上平台进行学习,第二学年暑期则于纽约进行沉浸式课程学习。该硕士项目立足于现今国外前沿的教学方法,结合当前中国英语教学的需求,注重培养学员们的英语教学与研究技能,提高他们课堂内外的组织管理能力。该项目师资力量强大,由纽约大学斯坦哈特学院及上海纽约大学教授授课,他们精于第二语言的教学与研究,深谙中国学生的学习特点,因人施教。学员毕业后,将获得由中国教育部认可的纽约大学硕士学位。

AI智能体赋能外语科研全过程工作坊

一、研修目标:本期工作坊面向高校外语教师科研实际需求,聚焦科研选题、文献综述、数据分析与科研绘图、论文撰写与修改等核心流程,帮助教师系统理解人工智能尤其是智能体技术在科研中的应用逻辑与实践路径。1. 理解智能体等技术的基本概念及其在科研中的应用机制,建立“AI不是单一工具,而是科研流程协作者和任务组织者”的认知框架。2. 掌握AI赋能科研论文全流程的核心方法,包括选题聚焦、文献检索、文献阅读、综述构建、论文写作、语言润色、投稿准备等关键环节。3. 掌握适用于外语学科的基础科研数据分析与科研绘图思路,能够在问卷、文本、语料、小规模实验等研究场景中合理借助AI开展数据整理、分析解释与结果可视化。4. 具备设计个人科研智能体或技能工作流的能力,能够围绕自身研究方向搭建可复用、可迭代的AI辅助科研流程。二、研修内容:1. 智能体、技能工作流与高校教师科研新范式介绍生成式人工智能向智能体发展的基本趋势,阐释智能体与技能工作流的概念、特点及其在科研任务组织、流程协同和能力复用中的作用,帮助教师建立AI赋能科研的新认知。2. 基于LLM与AI Agent开展研究:热点话题识别与文献脉络梳理围绕外语科研选题与文献研究需求,讲解大语言模型与多智能体协同如何支持研究前期工作,涵盖热点识别、文献检索与问题生成等关键环节,帮助研究者从“信息获取”走向“问题建构”,实现文献阅读的结构化、系统化与前瞻化。(1)从“热点感知”到“研究问题生成”:识别趋势与热点、构建研究问题链(2)LLM+智能体辅助高效文献检索:关键词扩展、多源数据库协同与自动筛选(3)AI辅助文献网络构建:通过知识图谱与语义聚类梳理学术脉络(4)AI辅助精读与比较阅读:多文献对比分析与文献矩阵构建(5)AI辅助研究选题生成:基于证据聚合识别研究缺口与创新空间3.LLM与AI Agent驱动科研成果产出:课题申请与论文写作围绕课题申请与论文写作需求,讲解大语言模型与科研智能体在论证构建、研究设计与学术表达中的协同作用,强调“生成—验证—优化”的人机共创机制,提升科研写作的逻辑性、规范性与创新性,实现从“写作辅助”到“科研智能体支持”的转变。(1)AI辅助课题选题与命题优化:多版本生成与可行性评估(2)AI驱动论证体系构建:研究背景、问题与价值的结构化生成与优化(3)AI辅助学术史梳理与研究进展分析:纵横结合识别研究缺口(4)AI辅助研究设计与方法匹配:方法推荐与技术路径优化(5)AI辅助写作中的多轮迭代优化:生成—批判—再生成的闭环机制4. AI辅助科研数据分析与科研绘图结合外语学科常见研究场景,介绍AI在问卷数据、文本材料、语料数据及小规模实验数据处理中的应用,讲解基础量化分析、文本分析、结果解释与科研图表、流程图、概念框架图绘制方法。(1)外语教师常见科研数据类型及其研究特征(2)AI辅助量化数据分析(3)AI辅助文本与语料分析(4)AI辅助研究结果可视化5. 个人科研智能体与技能工作流设计围绕高校外语教师科研实际需求,讲解如何将文献检索、综述写作、论文修改、数据分析与科研绘图等任务整合为个人科研智能体或技能工作流,提升科研工作的系统性、规范性与可持续性。(1)从“会用工具”到“会设计流程”(2)个人科研智能体构建思路(3)个人科研技能设计(4)构建外语教师个人AI科研工具箱6. 一对一个性化诊断课程环节针对教师发展的个性化需求,主讲专家将在研修期间晚间针对部分学员提供一对一诊断课程,需提前准备论文大纲或课题方案以供筛选。初步安排如下:4月17/18日18:00-20:00个性化辅导、问题答疑、实操指导1:AI工具实操演练与问题解决(1)规划常用AI科研工具(如文献检索、写作辅助、数据分析等)使用路径(2)解答教师在使用AI工具过程中遇到的具体问题(3)指导如何利用AI工具辅助论文写作,包括文献综述、数据分析与语言润色等组别一个性化辅导、问题答疑、实操指导2:课题、论文选题规划与思路论证(1)针对教师个人研究方向,提供课题选题建议(2)结合国家社科基金等申报要求,分析申报书结构与撰写要点(3)帮助教师梳理论文思路,提升选题创新性与可行性组别二三、研修特色1.坚持问题导向,紧扣高校外语教师科研论文写作与研究实践需要。2.突出智能体主线,注重从单一工具使用向科研工作流设计转变。3.强调学科适配,兼顾外语教学研究、语言研究、文本研究和语料研究等场景。4.注重实操应用,突出方法指导与科研任务转化。四、预期研修成效通过本期工作坊,参训教师预期能够形成以下成果:1.建立对智能体、技能及AI赋能科研的整体认识;2.掌握AI辅助文献检索、综述构建与论文写作的基本方法;3.能够借助AI开展基础科研数据分析与科研绘图;4.形成适合自身研究方向的个人科研智能体或技能工作流;5.提升科研效率、论文表达质量与科研数字素养。五、研修专家简介王萍博士、教授,上海外国语大学多语种智慧教育重点实验室主任。主要研究领域为技术赋能的语言学习、智能教育系统与学习分析。著有《教育人工智能与学习分析:理论与实践》等著作4部,主持和参与全国教育科学规划、教育部人文社会科学、上海市教育科学规划等科研项目十余项,在SSCI、CSSCI等期刊上发表论文40余篇,中国知网高被引学者TOP1%。主持上海市一流本科课程建设、上海市高校重点课程建设、上海外国语大学教材研究等教学项目。杨港博士、博士后,山东大学外国语学院副教授、硕士生导师。研究方向为外语教学理论与实践,学术兴趣包括AI 赋能的外语教学设计与评价、外语学习者认知与心理、外语教师发展等;主持国家社科基金一般项目、教育部人文社科研究青年基金项目、中国博士后科学基金面上资助项目、山东省本科教学改革研究项目等课题各1项、山东省社科规划研究项目2项;出版专著2部;主编教材5套14部,其中国家级规划教材6部;发表论文20余篇,其中 16篇收录于CSSCI来源期刊(如《外语界》《外语与外语教学》《外语电化教学》)、SSCI一区期刊(如System, Education and Information Technologies, International Journal of Multilingualism);获评山东省高等教育教学成果二等奖、山东省社会科学优秀成果三等奖和山东省普通高等教育一流教材以及“宝钢教育奖励基金”和“邵一兵教育奖励基金”。主要学术兼职包括:国家社科基金项目成果鉴定专家(获全国哲学社会科学工作办公室颁发的“认真负责的鉴定专家”荣誉称号)、多家CSSCI来源期刊以及SSCI期刊审稿专家等。

特色工具

系统产品

重点教材