新闻听力 | 演奏音乐有益大脑吗?

演奏音乐有益大脑吗?Is playing music good for the brain?常速 | 四级 | 605词 | 4min20s刘立军供稿Part I. QUESTIONSListen to the passage and choose the best answer to each question you hear.Q1. Why is making music considered a mental workout?A. It strengthens emotional control.B. It improves social communication skills.C. It requires the brain to coordinate several abilities. D. It mainly trains long-term memory.Q2. What benefit did studies find among professional musicians?A. They have more grey matter in some brain regions. B. They seldom have memory problems as they age. C. They can compose music much faster than others. D. They have larger brains overall.Q3. What is one possible advantage for children who begin instrument lessons young? A. They are more likely to speak a second language without an accent. B. The communication between their brain’s two hemispheres can be better. C. They will get higher scores in all school subjects. D. They can remember new words much faster than peers.Q4. What can we infer about music activities and cognitive abilities? A. Brass players usually outperform piano players in problem-solving tasks. B. Different kinds of music activities may lead to different cognitive strengths. C. Singers are generally weaker at planning tasks than woodwind players. D. Learning more instruments will bring greater improvements to memory.Q5. What is the main idea of the passage?A. Musical ability depends largely on genetics.B. Listening to music is better than playing instruments.C. Only professional musicians gain cognitive advantages.D. Music practice may benefit the brain in many ways.Part II. TRANSCRIPTIs Playing Music Good for Your Brain?Can playing music make your brain work better? Research suggests that it can, and you don’t have to be a professional musician to enjoy the benefits.(Q1) Playing a musical instrument is like a workout for the brain. When you play music, your brain has to do several things at the same time. You need to listen carefully, read notes, control your fingers, and keep your attention on what you are doing. You may also need to remember a piece of music and express your feelings through it. All these activities give your brain a lot of practice.(Q2) Studies have found that professional musicians have more grey matter in certain parts of the brain than people who do not play music. Grey matter is important for thinking, movement, and memory. Other research suggests that musicians may also have better memory and be better at planning and solving problems. However, scientists are still studying these effects, so more research is needed to understand them fully.gray matter (脑的)灰质,中枢神经系统的重要组成部分Music may be especially helpful for children. (Q3) Studies suggest that children who start learning an instrument at an early age may develop stronger connections between the two sides of their brains. Learning music may also help children learn a second language and improve their ability to understand information without using words. These skills can be useful both in school and in everyday life.But what about people who start learning music when they are older? The good news is that it may still be beneficial. As people age, their memory and thinking skills can become weaker. However, some studies have found that older adults who continue to learn and practice an instrument may experience less decline in certain mental abilities. Other research has linked regular music practice with a lower risk of developing dementia, a condition that affects memory and thinking. Scientists do not yet know whether playing music directly protects the brain or whether people with better brain health are simply more likely to continue playing.(Q4) The type of music activity may also make a difference. One study of older adults found that people who played the piano or brass instruments tended to have better working memory. Working memory helps us keep information in mind while using it. People who played woodwind instruments performed better on some tasks involving planning and problem-solving, while singers did better on tests of verbal reasoning. However, playing several instruments did not necessarily bring extra benefits.Music can also improve how we feel. When we play an instrument, the brain’s reward system becomes active, helping us feel pleasure. The body may also release chemicals called endorphins, which can help reduce pain and make us feel good. In addition, playing music with other people, such as in a band or choir, can reduce stress and help people build friendships.endorphin n. 内啡肽(一种体内生成的化学物质,能止痛并让人产生快感)What if you cannot play an instrument? Simply listening to music may also be good for your brain. A recent study found that older adults who regularly listened to music had a lower risk of cognitive decline than those who did not listen regularly. Cognitive decline means a gradual loss of memory and other thinking abilities. However, this study could not prove that listening to music was the reason for the difference.(Q5) Overall, research suggests that music can benefit the brain in several ways. It may help us improve our memory, develop thinking skills, manage stress, and stay mentally active as we grow older. You do not need to become a musical genius to enjoy these benefits. The key is to make music a regular part of your life, whether you play an instrument, sing, or simply listen.Part III. KEYQ1. C.【解析】细节题。题目出处为:“When you play music, your brain has to do several things at the same time. You need to listen carefully, read notes, control your fingers, ... All these activities give your brain a lot of practice.” 意为:“演奏音乐时,大脑必须同时进行多项活动,需要我们认真听,看谱,控制手指……所有这些活动会使我们的大脑得到大量训练。”因此,演奏音乐是一种脑力活动。正确答案为C。Q2. A.【解析】细节题。题目出处为:“Studies have found that professional musicians have more grey matter in certain parts of the brain than people who do not play music. Grey matter is important for thinking, movement, and memory. ” 意为:“研究发现,职业音乐家大脑某些区域的灰质比不演奏音乐的人更多。灰质对于控制思维、运动、和记忆十分重要。”因此正确答案为A。Q3. B.【解析】推理题。题目出处为:“Studies suggest that children who start learning an instrument at an early age may develop stronger connections between the two sides of their brains.” 意为:“研究表明,早早开始学习乐器的孩子,大脑左右半球之间会形成更强的联结。”因此正确答案为B,意为这些孩子大脑左右半球之间的联结会更佳,为同义表述。Q4. B.【解析】推断题。题目出处:“The type of music activity may also make a difference. One study of older adults found that people who played the piano or brass instruments tended to have better working memory. … People who played woodwind instruments performed better on some tasks involving planning and problem-solving, while singers did better on tests of verbal reasoning.” 意为:“不同类型的音乐活动,带来的益处也会有所差异。一项针对老年人的研究发现,常演奏钢琴或铜管乐器的长者,其工作记忆能力往往更强……演奏木管乐器的人在涉及规划与问题解决的任务中表现更优,而歌手则在言语推理测试中更具优势。”由此可推断,不同类型的音乐活动可能带来不同的认知优势。因此正确答案为 B。Q5. D.【解析】主旨题。题目出处为:“Overall, research suggests that music can benefit the brain in several ways. It may help us improve our memory, develop thinking skills, manage stress, and stay mentally active as we grow older.” 意为:“总体而言,研究表明音乐能从多个方面为大脑带来益处。它可能有助于我们改善记忆力,锻炼思维能力,调节压力,并在年岁渐长时保持思维活跃。”该句概括了全文的核心观点,因此正确答案为D。(本文图片来源于摄图网,版权归摄图网所有)

新闻听力 | 每天步行多少步能防止发胖?

每天步行多少步能防止发胖?How many daily steps can help keep weight off?常速 | 五级(偏难) | 443词 | 2min59s刘立军供稿Part I. QUESTIONSListen to the passage and choose the best answer to each question you hear.Q1. What daily step goal does the study suggest may help people maintain weight loss?A. Around 6,000 steps each day.B. Around 7,000 steps each day.C. Around 8,500 steps each day.D. Around 10,000 steps each day.Q2. What kind of data did the researchers analyze in the study?A. Medical records from several health institutions.B. Data collected from eighteen earlier studies.C. Survey responses from daily fitness users.D. Interviews with doctors at obesity clinics.Q3. According to the study, what did researchers discover about walking during weight loss programs?A. It immediately improved participants’ overall health.B. It replaced the need for diet changes.C. It helped people lose weight much faster.D. It showed limited effect on additional weight loss.Q4. What can be inferred about the role of physical activity in weight management?A. It works best when combined with medical treatment.B. It is more helpful for keeping weight off long term.C. It is mainly useful for people with severe obesity.D. It is more effective than diet control at first.Q5. What does Dr. Tara Narula mainly suggest about the study findings?A. They should be considered a useful but preliminary result.B. They should guide people to exercise exactly 8,500 steps.C. They should replace traditional weight loss advice.D. They should be applied to every adult immediately.Part II. TRANSCRIPTHow many daily steps can help keep weight off?(Q1) A new study suggests that increasing daily step counts may help people maintain weight loss in the long term, and a goal to shoot for may be around 8,500 steps a day.(Q2) The research, published in the International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health and presented last week at the European Obesity Conference, analyzed data from 18 previous studies looking at weight loss and physical activity.(Q3) Researchers found that walking more was not strongly linked to losing additional weight during active weight loss programs. However, people who continued taking more steps each day were more likely to keep the weight off over time.Over an average follow-up period of about 1.5 years, researchers found participants maintained roughly 1% of weight loss for every additional 1,000 steps they walked daily, with the average participant starting at about 7,400 steps per day at baseline.The study noted that an average of 8,500 daily steps appeared to help participants maintain weight loss the longest, though researchers stressed that it is not a strict target or prescription for everyone.prescription n. 处方;建议;规定The increased activity happened as part of structured lifestyle programs that also included diet changes and behavioral counseling.“This was a lifestyle modification program, and it really is a multifactorial approach when it comes to weight loss. So these individuals got diet and behavioral counseling in addition to really moving more. And so you really need all of that,” ABC News medical contributor Dr. Tara Narula said on “Good Morning America” Monday.multifactorial adj. 多因素的;由多种因素造成的(Q5) Narula noted that researchers described the findings as “hypothesis-generating” and said more research is needed.“The researchers say, look, this is really hypothesis-generating; it should push us to do more research,” she explained. “It is not a prescription that everyone should go out and now do 8,500 steps. But it is helpful information.”(Q4) Researchers concluded that calorie restriction was likely more impactful during the weight loss phase, while higher levels of physical activity were more closely tied to long-term weight loss maintenance.The study also had several limitations. The analysis only included adults who were overweight or obese and relied on pooled population data, meaning the findings show correlation rather than direct cause and effect.correlation n. 相互关系;关联“Certainly if you’re planning to do a weight loss program, talk to your doctor about what is right for you in terms of your movement and goals overall,” Narula said. “And healthy habits build on each other. The more you lose weight, the more you want to exercise, and you feel better. But it really is helpful to know that just that little bit of increase might be all you need.”Part III. KEYQ1.C.【解析】细节题。题目出处为:“A new study suggests that increasing daily step counts may help people maintain weight loss in the long term, and a goal to shoot for may be around 8,500 steps a day.” 意为:“一项新的研究表明,增加每日步数或许有助于长期保持减重效果,建议将每日步数目标设置为每天8500步左右。”该句直接给出了研究所建议的步数目标,因此正确答案为C。Q2.B.【解析】细节题。题目出处为:“The research, published in the International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health and presented last week at the European Obesity Conference, analyzed data from 18 previous studies looking at weight loss and physical activity.” 意为:“这项研究发表在《国际环境研究与公共健康期刊》上,并于上周在欧洲肥胖大会上做了报告。研究分析了此前18项探讨减重和身体活动关系的相关数据。”该句明确说明研究的数据来源,因此正确答案为B。Q3.D.【解析】细节题。题目出处为:“Researchers found that walking more was not strongly linked to losing additional weight during active weight loss programs.” 意为:“研究人员发现,在减重计划进行阶段,多走路与进一步减轻体重之间并没有很强的联系。”由此可知,在减重过程中增加步数并不会显著带来额外的减重效果,因此正确答案为D。Q4.B.【解析】推理题。题目出处为:“Researchers concluded that calorie restriction was likely more impactful during the weight loss phase, while higher levels of physical activity were more closely tied to long-term weight loss maintenance.” 意为:“研究人员得出结论,在减重阶段限制热量摄入的作用可能更为显著,而更高强度的运动则与长期维持减重成果关系更为密切。”由此可以推断,运动对于维持长期减重更为有效,因此正确答案为B。Q5.A.【解析】观点题。题目出处为:“Narula noted that researchers described the findings as ‘hypothesis generating’ and said more research is needed.” 意为:“纳鲁拉指出,研究人员将这些发现定性为‘生成假说’性质,并强调仍需要进一步研究。” 该句表明研究结果具有一定参考价值,但仍属于初步发现,需要进一步研究验证,因此正确答案为A。(本文图片来源于摄图网,版权归摄图网所有)

双语阅读 | 为什么大型AI实验室正在大量招聘哲学家?

为什么大型AI实验室正在大量招聘哲学家?Why big AI labs are hiring so many philosophers?文本难度:CET-6刘立军供稿Ten years ago, as the AI revolution was gathering pace, arts and humanities students were told that, if they wanted to make themselves employable, they should “learn to code”. That may have been bad advice. These days, it is programmers who are nervous about AI taking their jobs.十年前,随着人工智能革命加速推进,文科生曾被告知,如果想让自己更具就业竞争力,就应该“学点编程”。但如今看来,这或许是个糟糕的建议。现在感到焦虑的已换成了程序员——他们担心自己的岗位会被AI取代。They might consider learning to philosophize. Earlier this year the Federal Reserve Bank of New York published figures showing that American philosophy graduates are more likely to have jobs than their peers who studied computer science. In 2024, the most recent year for which numbers are available, 7% of those who had studied computer science were unemployed, against just 5.1% of philosophers.他们或许才该考虑去学学哲学。今年早些时候,纽约联邦储备银行公布的数据显示,美国哲学专业毕业生比计算机科学专业的同龄人更容易找到工作。在数据可查的最近年份——2024年,计算机专业毕业生的失业率达7%,而哲学专业毕业生仅为5.1%。Many are being snapped up by AI firms themselves. Students get job offers before they have graduated, says Luciano Floridi, a philosopher at Yale University. Academics are moving, too. Dr Floridi describes the scale of departures from philosophy departments as a “hemorrhaging”.许多哲学专业毕业生正被AI公司直接抢走。耶鲁大学哲学家卢西亚诺·弗洛里迪表示,很多学生还没毕业就收到了工作录用通知。高校学者也在纷纷出走。弗洛里迪博士将哲学系人才流失的态势形容为一场“大出血”。Some of the lessons that philosophy can offer AI researchers are ancient. The Socratic method—as described by Plato, an ancient Greek philosopher—uses feigned ignorance and sequential questioning to clarify meanings, spot contradictions and reveal ramifications. Many current AI systems tend towards sycophancy. Models trained in the Socratic method, says Jörg Noller, an expert on philosophy and AI at Ludwig Maximilian University of Munich, are less keen on people-pleasing and more willing to pursue the truth.哲学能为AI研究者提供的某些洞见,其实古已有之。古希腊哲学家柏拉图所描述的苏格拉底诘问法,通过“假装无知”和循序渐进的提问,来厘清概念、发现矛盾并推演深层影响。然而,当前许多AI系统都存在一味迎合用户的倾向。慕尼黑大学哲学与AI交叉领域专家约尔格·诺勒表示,若用苏格拉底式方法来训练模型,它们会减少讨好用户的冲动,转而更坚定地追求真相。Philosophical training can also affect a model’s outlook in more specific ways. Feed an AI legal assistant the writings of John Locke, says Thomas Powers, a philosopher of technology at the University of Delaware, and it will favor robust property rights as an underpinning of political liberty. And if you don’t like those principles, the model-makers have others. The “Granite” series of models from IBM, an American computing giant, come with dials that let business customers better align outputs with their own corporate philosophies. Francesca Rossi, IBM’s head of responsible AI, says these can let users choose where to strike the balance between philosophical trade-offs, such as individual agency versus social harmony.哲学训练还能以更具体的方式,塑造模型的价值取向。特拉华大学技术哲学家托马斯·鲍尔斯指出,如果让AI法律助手研读约翰·洛克的著作,它就会倾向于将坚实的财产权视为政治自由的基石。如果你不喜欢这些原则,模型开发者还有其他选择。美国计算巨头IBM推出的“Granite”系列模型配备了调节旋钮,让企业客户能够更好地使输出结果与自身的企业理念相契合。IBM“负责任AI”负责人弗朗西斯卡·罗西表示,这些旋钮可以让用户在各种哲学层面的取舍间把握平衡,例如在“个人自主性”与“社会和谐”之间找到恰当的权衡点。Philosophy can help with safety, too. Researchers have documented all sorts of ominous behavior in AI models, including attempts to evade oversight and even blackmail their users. One way model-makers try to discourage this sort of misbehavior is called AI constitutionalism. This involves building a model around a scaffolding of rules and principles culled from philosophical writings with legal or moral authority.哲学也能在安全领域发挥作用。研究人员记录了AI模型中出现的各种令人担忧的行为,包括试图规避监管甚至勒索用户的行为。为遏制此类不当行为,模型开发者引入一种被称为“AI宪政主义”的机制。该机制要求以一套规则和原则作为底层支撑框架,而这些规范均是从具有法律或道德权威的哲学著作中遴选提炼而成。The biggest question, though, is what sorts of rules should be put in those constitutions in the first place. Philosophers have zeroed in on two main ethical frameworks. One is deontology. Popular with Kant, among others, this imposes strict rules that prohibit things like lying, coercion and treating people as a means rather than an end, even if it is for a greater good. Anthropic’s constitution incorporates many deontological strictures. These can make AI behavior more consistent, says Dr Powers—a plus for deploying robots in homes and public spaces.然而,最大的问题是:这些“宪法”中究竟应该纳入什么样的规则?哲学家们聚焦于两大核心伦理框架。其一是义务论。以康德等学者为代表,该理论强调设定严格的规则,禁止说谎、胁迫或将他人视为手段而非目的等行为,即使此举可能带来所谓的更大福祉。Anthropic公司的“宪法”便纳入了许多义务论式的刚性约束。鲍尔斯博士表示,这类规范可以使AI行为更加一致——这正是在家庭和公共场所部署机器人的重要优势。The other approach to ethics of interest to philosophers of AI is called consequentialism. It weighs costs against benefits to decide what to do. Models more sympathetic to consequentialism include OpenAI’s ChatGPT and Google’s Gemini. Google’s AI models are designed to produce “likely overall benefits [that] substantially outweigh the foreseeable risks”, a classic consequentialist goal.AI哲学研究者关注的另一种伦理方法被称为结果主义。它通过权衡成本与收益来决定该做什么。更倾向于结果主义的模型有OpenAI的ChatGPT和谷歌的Gemini。谷歌的AI模型在设计时明确以“可能带来的整体收益远远超过可预见的风险”为目标——这是一个典型的结果论目标。Consequentialist algorithms are also crucial in software for autonomous vehicles: if an accident is unavoidable, a decision must be made on the least tragic way to crash. Chris Gerdes, a senior engineer at Waymo, which makes self-driving cars, says the trend is to make driving software more consequentialist. Consequentialism is also central to AI weapon systems. Military objectives must be weighed against possible civilian deaths, says Jack Shanahan, a former head of the Joint Artificial Intelligence Centre, which studies AI for America’s armed forces.结果主义算法在自动驾驶汽车的软件中也至关重要:如果事故不可避免,就必须做出决策,以损失最小的方式发生碰撞。自动驾驶汽车制造商Waymo的资深工程师克里斯·格德斯表示,目前的趋势是让驾驶软件更深度地融入结果主义逻辑。结果主义也是AI武器系统的核心原则。曾负责为美军开展人工智能研究的“联合人工智能中心”前主任杰克·沙纳汉表示,必须在军事目标的达成与可能造成的平民伤亡风险之间进行权衡。Thorny problems abound—a philosopher’s favorite sort. Are there cases when deontological rules should be overridden? How do you make decisions when the consequences are unclear? Should AI systems take into account animal welfare, or the state of the environment? Would it be morally acceptable to prioritize young pedestrians over old ones? 棘手的问题层出不穷——正是哲学家最热衷探讨的那类问题。是否存在义务论规则应该被推翻的情况?当后果不明确时,该如何做出决策?AI系统是否应该考虑动物福利或环境状况?优先保护年轻行人而非年长行人,在道德上是否可以接受?Critics fret about “moral deskilling”: if computers increasingly make ethical calls, might people become less willing to make their own judgments? Roman Yampolskiy, an AI theoretician at the University of Louisville, argues that morality “is historically unstable, culturally variable, strategically manipulable, and often only retrospectively legible”. Unemployed coders take note: there seems to be no shortage of work for philosophers of AI.批评者担忧“道德能力退化”:如果计算机越来越多地做出伦理判断,人们是否会逐渐丧失自己做判断的意愿?路易斯维尔大学的AI理论家罗曼·扬波尔斯基认为,道德“具有历史的不稳定性、文化的可变性与策略的可操纵性,而且往往只能事后追溯其意义”。失业的程序员们请注意:AI哲学家的饭碗恐怕永远不缺。【词汇】1. humanities n. 人文学科;人文科学2. hemorrhage n. 大量流失(文中喻指人才流失)3. Socratic adj. 苏格拉底的;苏格拉底式的4. feign v. 佯装;假装5. ramification n. 衍生含义;复杂影响6. sycophant n. 谄媚者;阿谀奉承的人7. underpin v. 支撑;作为……的基石8. ominous adj. 不祥的;令人担忧的9. scaffolding n. 脚手架;支撑结构(文中喻指框架)10. cull v. 挑选;选取11. coercion n. 胁迫;强迫12. deontological adj. 义务论的13. stricture n. 戒律;严格限制14. ethics n. 伦理学;伦理15. outweigh v. 超过;比……更重要16. algorithm n. 算法17. tragic adj. 悲剧性的;可悲的18. fret v. 担忧;焦虑19. deskill v. 使技能退化;去技能化20. legible adj. 可读的;可理解的(本文图片来源于摄图网,版权归摄图网所有)

新闻听力 | 演奏音乐有益大脑吗?

演奏音乐有益大脑吗?Is playing music good for the brain?常速 | 四级 | 605词 | 4min20s刘立军供稿Part I. QUESTIONSListen to the passage and choose the best answer to each question you hear.Q1. Why is making music considered a mental workout?A. It strengthens emotional control.B. It improves social communication skills.C. It requires the brain to coordinate several abilities. D. It mainly trains long-term memory.Q2. What benefit did studies find among professional musicians?A. They have more grey matter in some brain regions. B. They seldom have memory problems as they age. C. They can compose music much faster than others. D. They have larger brains overall.Q3. What is one possible advantage for children who begin instrument lessons young? A. They are more likely to speak a second language without an accent. B. The communication between their brain’s two hemispheres can be better. C. They will get higher scores in all school subjects. D. They can remember new words much faster than peers.Q4. What can we infer about music activities and cognitive abilities? A. Brass players usually outperform piano players in problem-solving tasks. B. Different kinds of music activities may lead to different cognitive strengths. C. Singers are generally weaker at planning tasks than woodwind players. D. Learning more instruments will bring greater improvements to memory.Q5. What is the main idea of the passage?A. Musical ability depends largely on genetics.B. Listening to music is better than playing instruments.C. Only professional musicians gain cognitive advantages.D. Music practice may benefit the brain in many ways.Part II. TRANSCRIPTIs Playing Music Good for Your Brain?Can playing music make your brain work better? Research suggests that it can, and you don’t have to be a professional musician to enjoy the benefits.(Q1) Playing a musical instrument is like a workout for the brain. When you play music, your brain has to do several things at the same time. You need to listen carefully, read notes, control your fingers, and keep your attention on what you are doing. You may also need to remember a piece of music and express your feelings through it. All these activities give your brain a lot of practice.(Q2) Studies have found that professional musicians have more grey matter in certain parts of the brain than people who do not play music. Grey matter is important for thinking, movement, and memory. Other research suggests that musicians may also have better memory and be better at planning and solving problems. However, scientists are still studying these effects, so more research is needed to understand them fully.gray matter (脑的)灰质,中枢神经系统的重要组成部分Music may be especially helpful for children. (Q3) Studies suggest that children who start learning an instrument at an early age may develop stronger connections between the two sides of their brains. Learning music may also help children learn a second language and improve their ability to understand information without using words. These skills can be useful both in school and in everyday life.But what about people who start learning music when they are older? The good news is that it may still be beneficial. As people age, their memory and thinking skills can become weaker. However, some studies have found that older adults who continue to learn and practice an instrument may experience less decline in certain mental abilities. Other research has linked regular music practice with a lower risk of developing dementia, a condition that affects memory and thinking. Scientists do not yet know whether playing music directly protects the brain or whether people with better brain health are simply more likely to continue playing.(Q4) The type of music activity may also make a difference. One study of older adults found that people who played the piano or brass instruments tended to have better working memory. Working memory helps us keep information in mind while using it. People who played woodwind instruments performed better on some tasks involving planning and problem-solving, while singers did better on tests of verbal reasoning. However, playing several instruments did not necessarily bring extra benefits.Music can also improve how we feel. When we play an instrument, the brain’s reward system becomes active, helping us feel pleasure. The body may also release chemicals called endorphins, which can help reduce pain and make us feel good. In addition, playing music with other people, such as in a band or choir, can reduce stress and help people build friendships.endorphin n. 内啡肽(一种体内生成的化学物质,能止痛并让人产生快感)What if you cannot play an instrument? Simply listening to music may also be good for your brain. A recent study found that older adults who regularly listened to music had a lower risk of cognitive decline than those who did not listen regularly. Cognitive decline means a gradual loss of memory and other thinking abilities. However, this study could not prove that listening to music was the reason for the difference.(Q5) Overall, research suggests that music can benefit the brain in several ways. It may help us improve our memory, develop thinking skills, manage stress, and stay mentally active as we grow older. You do not need to become a musical genius to enjoy these benefits. The key is to make music a regular part of your life, whether you play an instrument, sing, or simply listen.Part III. KEYQ1. C.【解析】细节题。题目出处为:“When you play music, your brain has to do several things at the same time. You need to listen carefully, read notes, control your fingers, ... All these activities give your brain a lot of practice.” 意为:“演奏音乐时,大脑必须同时进行多项活动,需要我们认真听,看谱,控制手指……所有这些活动会使我们的大脑得到大量训练。”因此,演奏音乐是一种脑力活动。正确答案为C。Q2. A.【解析】细节题。题目出处为:“Studies have found that professional musicians have more grey matter in certain parts of the brain than people who do not play music. Grey matter is important for thinking, movement, and memory. ” 意为:“研究发现,职业音乐家大脑某些区域的灰质比不演奏音乐的人更多。灰质对于控制思维、运动、和记忆十分重要。”因此正确答案为A。Q3. B.【解析】推理题。题目出处为:“Studies suggest that children who start learning an instrument at an early age may develop stronger connections between the two sides of their brains.” 意为:“研究表明,早早开始学习乐器的孩子,大脑左右半球之间会形成更强的联结。”因此正确答案为B,意为这些孩子大脑左右半球之间的联结会更佳,为同义表述。Q4. B.【解析】推断题。题目出处:“The type of music activity may also make a difference. One study of older adults found that people who played the piano or brass instruments tended to have better working memory. … People who played woodwind instruments performed better on some tasks involving planning and problem-solving, while singers did better on tests of verbal reasoning.” 意为:“不同类型的音乐活动,带来的益处也会有所差异。一项针对老年人的研究发现,常演奏钢琴或铜管乐器的长者,其工作记忆能力往往更强……演奏木管乐器的人在涉及规划与问题解决的任务中表现更优,而歌手则在言语推理测试中更具优势。”由此可推断,不同类型的音乐活动可能带来不同的认知优势。因此正确答案为 B。Q5. D.【解析】主旨题。题目出处为:“Overall, research suggests that music can benefit the brain in several ways. It may help us improve our memory, develop thinking skills, manage stress, and stay mentally active as we grow older.” 意为:“总体而言,研究表明音乐能从多个方面为大脑带来益处。它可能有助于我们改善记忆力,锻炼思维能力,调节压力,并在年岁渐长时保持思维活跃。”该句概括了全文的核心观点,因此正确答案为D。(本文图片来源于摄图网,版权归摄图网所有)

新闻听力 | 每天步行多少步能防止发胖?

每天步行多少步能防止发胖?How many daily steps can help keep weight off?常速 | 五级(偏难) | 443词 | 2min59s刘立军供稿Part I. QUESTIONSListen to the passage and choose the best answer to each question you hear.Q1. What daily step goal does the study suggest may help people maintain weight loss?A. Around 6,000 steps each day.B. Around 7,000 steps each day.C. Around 8,500 steps each day.D. Around 10,000 steps each day.Q2. What kind of data did the researchers analyze in the study?A. Medical records from several health institutions.B. Data collected from eighteen earlier studies.C. Survey responses from daily fitness users.D. Interviews with doctors at obesity clinics.Q3. According to the study, what did researchers discover about walking during weight loss programs?A. It immediately improved participants’ overall health.B. It replaced the need for diet changes.C. It helped people lose weight much faster.D. It showed limited effect on additional weight loss.Q4. What can be inferred about the role of physical activity in weight management?A. It works best when combined with medical treatment.B. It is more helpful for keeping weight off long term.C. It is mainly useful for people with severe obesity.D. It is more effective than diet control at first.Q5. What does Dr. Tara Narula mainly suggest about the study findings?A. They should be considered a useful but preliminary result.B. They should guide people to exercise exactly 8,500 steps.C. They should replace traditional weight loss advice.D. They should be applied to every adult immediately.Part II. TRANSCRIPTHow many daily steps can help keep weight off?(Q1) A new study suggests that increasing daily step counts may help people maintain weight loss in the long term, and a goal to shoot for may be around 8,500 steps a day.(Q2) The research, published in the International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health and presented last week at the European Obesity Conference, analyzed data from 18 previous studies looking at weight loss and physical activity.(Q3) Researchers found that walking more was not strongly linked to losing additional weight during active weight loss programs. However, people who continued taking more steps each day were more likely to keep the weight off over time.Over an average follow-up period of about 1.5 years, researchers found participants maintained roughly 1% of weight loss for every additional 1,000 steps they walked daily, with the average participant starting at about 7,400 steps per day at baseline.The study noted that an average of 8,500 daily steps appeared to help participants maintain weight loss the longest, though researchers stressed that it is not a strict target or prescription for everyone.prescription n. 处方;建议;规定The increased activity happened as part of structured lifestyle programs that also included diet changes and behavioral counseling.“This was a lifestyle modification program, and it really is a multifactorial approach when it comes to weight loss. So these individuals got diet and behavioral counseling in addition to really moving more. And so you really need all of that,” ABC News medical contributor Dr. Tara Narula said on “Good Morning America” Monday.multifactorial adj. 多因素的;由多种因素造成的(Q5) Narula noted that researchers described the findings as “hypothesis-generating” and said more research is needed.“The researchers say, look, this is really hypothesis-generating; it should push us to do more research,” she explained. “It is not a prescription that everyone should go out and now do 8,500 steps. But it is helpful information.”(Q4) Researchers concluded that calorie restriction was likely more impactful during the weight loss phase, while higher levels of physical activity were more closely tied to long-term weight loss maintenance.The study also had several limitations. The analysis only included adults who were overweight or obese and relied on pooled population data, meaning the findings show correlation rather than direct cause and effect.correlation n. 相互关系;关联“Certainly if you’re planning to do a weight loss program, talk to your doctor about what is right for you in terms of your movement and goals overall,” Narula said. “And healthy habits build on each other. The more you lose weight, the more you want to exercise, and you feel better. But it really is helpful to know that just that little bit of increase might be all you need.”Part III. KEYQ1.C.【解析】细节题。题目出处为:“A new study suggests that increasing daily step counts may help people maintain weight loss in the long term, and a goal to shoot for may be around 8,500 steps a day.” 意为:“一项新的研究表明,增加每日步数或许有助于长期保持减重效果,建议将每日步数目标设置为每天8500步左右。”该句直接给出了研究所建议的步数目标,因此正确答案为C。Q2.B.【解析】细节题。题目出处为:“The research, published in the International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health and presented last week at the European Obesity Conference, analyzed data from 18 previous studies looking at weight loss and physical activity.” 意为:“这项研究发表在《国际环境研究与公共健康期刊》上,并于上周在欧洲肥胖大会上做了报告。研究分析了此前18项探讨减重和身体活动关系的相关数据。”该句明确说明研究的数据来源,因此正确答案为B。Q3.D.【解析】细节题。题目出处为:“Researchers found that walking more was not strongly linked to losing additional weight during active weight loss programs.” 意为:“研究人员发现,在减重计划进行阶段,多走路与进一步减轻体重之间并没有很强的联系。”由此可知,在减重过程中增加步数并不会显著带来额外的减重效果,因此正确答案为D。Q4.B.【解析】推理题。题目出处为:“Researchers concluded that calorie restriction was likely more impactful during the weight loss phase, while higher levels of physical activity were more closely tied to long-term weight loss maintenance.” 意为:“研究人员得出结论,在减重阶段限制热量摄入的作用可能更为显著,而更高强度的运动则与长期维持减重成果关系更为密切。”由此可以推断,运动对于维持长期减重更为有效,因此正确答案为B。Q5.A.【解析】观点题。题目出处为:“Narula noted that researchers described the findings as ‘hypothesis generating’ and said more research is needed.” 意为:“纳鲁拉指出,研究人员将这些发现定性为‘生成假说’性质,并强调仍需要进一步研究。” 该句表明研究结果具有一定参考价值,但仍属于初步发现,需要进一步研究验证,因此正确答案为A。(本文图片来源于摄图网,版权归摄图网所有)

新闻听力 | 疫苗安全真相

The truth about vaccine safety疫苗安全真相常速 | 五级(中等)| 856词 | 5min41s刘立军供稿Part I. QUESTIONSListen to the interview and choose the best answer to each question you hear.Q1. What is the main function of antigens in vaccines?A. To enhance the immune system’s response. B. To ensure the vaccine remains effective after opening. C. To preserve the vaccine during transport. D. To help the body recognize foreign germs. Q2. What is the main purpose of stabilizers in vaccines?A. To ensure vaccines remain effective during storage and transport. B. To boost the immune system’s response to germs. C. To allow vaccines to be administered in multiple doses. D. To enhance the body’s recognition of foreign invaders. Q3. What does the Global Advisory Committee on Vaccine Safety do?A. It develops new vaccines for global use. B. It monitors vaccine safety throughout their lifetime. C. It ensures vaccines meet all clinical trial standards. D. It issues reports on vaccine development progress. Q4. What can be inferred about the vaccine safety monitoring system?A. It relies solely on clinical trial data for safety evaluation. B. It prevents people from reporting unrelated issues. C. It identifies patterns from millions of submitted reports. D. It stops monitoring once vaccines are approved. Part II. TRANSCRIPTThe truth about vaccine safetyVGS: We are talking about vaccine today. This is part two of the vaccine series of Science in 5. In the first part, we spoke about some concerns that parents may have. (Q1) And in this video we are going to talk to our expert, Dr Kate O’Brien, about the ingredients of the vaccine. How do we make sure that vaccines are safe? Let’s start with the ingredients of the vaccine. There’s a lot of information and even misinformation out there. So please unpack this for us.KOB: So I want to just go through a couple of them because they have, you know, words and names that are pretty unfamiliar in our kind of day to day lives. And I think for a lot of people it can be concerning. For some it might sound a bit scary in some way. Many of the ingredients are actually components that we have in our environment, or in our foods. Not all the components of vaccines are foreign to our bodies or our exposure. So some of the ingredients include antigens. (Q2) Antigens are the part of a germ that is the actual part we want the body to develop its immunity to. It helps the immune system to actually recognize that foreign invader, that foreign germ that’s going to potentially cause disease. Second, are adjuvants. And adjuvants are the part of the vaccine that help boost the immune system. Not all vaccines will result in an adequate immune response without an adjuvant. The third part that’s added to a vaccine are maybe we can call them stabilizers. (Q3) And these are things that make sure that the vaccine is safe during transport and during all of the moving of the vaccine around. We also have, components of the vaccine that allow for some vaccines to be used after the vaccine vial is opened. If that’s made with multiple doses in a vial, it needs to be safe to keep that vaccine for multiple days in the refrigerator so that the next child who comes in can receive an additional dose in the vaccine.adjuvant n. 佐剂,助剂 vial n. 小瓶,药瓶 VGS: So let’s talk about the safety of the vaccine. That’s a concern a lot of parents may have. There is certainly a lot of information and misinformation about it outside. Talk to us about how we ensure that vaccines are safe. What is that process that vaccines are put through before they come to market?KOB: The very first thing that happens is that when a vaccine is being developed in the clinical trials, safety is monitored extremely carefully on a day to day basis, among those who have received the vaccine. There are phone calls made, logs filled out by parents about exactly what’s happening to this child. In order for a vaccine to go from a clinical trial to actually being an approved vaccine all of that safety information is rigorously evaluated, and it is assessed by experts who determine whether or not it needs safety standards. After a vaccine has been approved by a health authority the safety monitoring does not stop. In fact, safety monitoring goes out for the whole lifetime of use of a vaccine. It never actually stops. So health authorities are monitoring whether any reports are being given about potential problems with a vaccine. (Q4) Now at WHO, we have a safety committee. It’s an external committee of experts. And they get together and they review the reports that are submitted to the Global Monitoring Center. This is called the Global Advisory Committee on Vaccine Safety. And if a new safety issue comes up, we will issue a report around that safety issue.rigorously adv. 严厉地;严密地 VGS: So let’s talk about it when, there are concerns about the safety or there are concerns about a vaccine. What happens next?KOB: So what’s really important for people to understand is how this system works. It doesn’t mean anything to actually be telling the world how many reports came in, because you could submit a report about something that has absolutely nothing to do with the vaccine. That’s why the system is completely open, we don’t want to put any barriers up to people being able to report. What’s done with all of those reports is a careful review of them, especially in relation to which vaccines the report says were received and to see if there are any patterns that start to emerge in the reports. (Q5) If there starts to be a signal that comes up from those many, many, in fact, millions of reports that are sent in, we look into that signal specifically with the kinds of studies that will determine, is this something that is actually related to the vaccine or not related to the vaccine?VGS: Thank you Kate for explaining that. Those were some of the questions that we knew people had about vaccines. If you have more questions, put that on our timelines and tell us if you want us to continue explaining, clarifying any of your concerns about vaccines. Until next time then, stay safe, stay healthy and stick with science.Part III. KEYQ1. D.【解析】细节题。根据“Antigens are the part of a germ that is the actual part we want the body to develop its immunity to. It helps the immune system to actually recognize that foreign invader, that foreign germ that’s going to potentially cause disease.”,可知抗原的功能是帮助免疫系统识别外来病原体,因此正确答案是D。 Q2. A.【解析】细节题。根据“And these are things that make sure that the vaccine is safe during transport and during all of the moving of the vaccine around.”,可知稳定剂的主要功能是确保疫苗在运输和移动过程中保持安全有效。因此正确答案是A。 Q3. B.【解析】细节题。根据“And they get together and they review the reports that are submitted to the Global Monitoring Center. This is called the Global Advisory Committee on Vaccine Safety. And if a new safety issue comes up, we will issue a report around that safety issue.”,可知世卫组织的全球疫苗安全咨询委员会负责监控疫苗的安全性,并在发现新的安全问题时发布相关报告,也就是说该委员会的职责是全程监控疫苗的安全性,因此正确答案是B。 Q4. C.【解析】推理题。根据“If there starts to be a signal that comes up from those many, many, in fact, millions of reports that are sent in, we look into that signal specifically with the kinds of studies that will determine, is this something that is actually related to the vaccine or not related to the vaccine.”,可知如果从那些实际上提交的数百万份报告中开始出现一个信号,监控系统会专门通过研究来分析该信号,以确定它是否与疫苗相关。这表明监控系统通过分析大量报告来识别潜在问题,因此正确答案是C。 (本文图片来源于摄图网,版权归摄图网所有)

第12届教学大赛商务英语组二等奖贺静授课

授课点评:贺静老师授课效果较好,教学目标清楚、教学方法得当、教学程序井井有条。此外,贺静老师口齿清晰,语音语调比较纯正、流利;教态端庄自然,有亲和力,教学过程中与学生互动良好,体现了以学生为主体,教师为主导的教学原则。授课分两部分。第一部分介绍该单元(Empire of Wealth)的总教学安排,用了3分30秒,时间把握得比较好。另外,设计的PPT形式多样,各种图表清楚展现了教学安排。授课开始的第三分钟,PPT显示的该单元总教学目标及三篇课文的教学目标一览无遗,加上贺静老师的阐释,清晰地传递了教学目标和学习目标,这能帮助学生在课堂内外围绕主题有效学习。紧接着,贺静老师借助PPT上的流程图比较详细地介绍了授课课文In Praise of Competitive Urges的教学安排,其中的Problem-centred教学方法对学生发现、分析和解决问题有很大帮助。之后进入第二部分:比赛授课阶段。第二部分具体授课含四个阶段。进入第一阶段Warm-up时,贺静老师显得有点紧张,但很快就调整好了状态。该阶段有教师对课文理解的提问,请学生从课文中找到相关的依据回答问题,这种做法本来值得称道,因为授课不能离开课文。但是,Warm-up阶段是课前准备阶段,因此,贺静老师在Warm-up阶段讲解课文不妥,建议把重点放在教材中的Warm-up Activities上,适当设计一些附加的活动,才符合教学逻辑。此外,在总时间为20分钟且第一阶段用了3分30秒的情况下,Warm-up阶段用了5分1秒显得有点过长。之后是第二阶段Questionnaire Results,贺静老师分析解释了调查表中的信息,谈了自己对问题的看法,期间激励学生思考、回答问题,这对培养学生的独立思考能力及理解课文非常有益。Questionnaire之后进入授课第三阶段:Wealth-flaunting Motivations / Summarizing。炫富动机是课文包含的核心内容之一。因此,讨论炫富动机有助于学生理解课文。教师要求学生从PPT上(视频13')显示的课文段落寻找答案,并要求学生做pair work找到有关的词汇。另外,通过分析课文的修辞寓意,贺静老师阐释了文章作者的真实目的。这一点做得很好。另一方面,根据该单元内容,所授的是“综合商务英语”课程。因此,贺静老师应更多围绕语言难点、篇章结构、写作风格、文法修辞等方面进行解释,让学生对课文有更深层次的理解。第四阶段Assignment在视频18'15"开始。课后作业包括questionnaire设计、调研报告写作、相关阅读作业。这样较好兼顾了综合商务英语课程语言学习和商务实践的教学特点。建议更多以教材内容教学为主,重视语言、篇章教学,在帮助学生充分理解课文的前提下掌握一些商务知识和技能;需要结合课文融入更多的思政教育内容。点评专家:翁凤翔

第12届教学大赛商务英语组特等奖潘紫萌说课

说课点评:在30分钟的准备时间里,读完、理解一篇800多词的商务英语文章,记住文章的结构和要点,设计出一套有理论指导、教学理念清晰、目标合理、结构完整、方法得当,最好再带点创新的教学方案,然后在10分钟的时间里,用英语条理清晰地把它展示出来,这对任何商务英语教师来讲都是一项重大的挑战。潘紫萌老师首先分析了课文,根据内容将其解构成三大部分。选手将第二部分(第3-8段)归纳成 promotion, price and place 和将第三部分(第9段)归纳成对计划进入中国市场的外国企业的忠告,这都是正确的。但是,她把第一部分(第1-2段)归纳成product,进而把前两部分归纳成营销学中著名的4P战略,这种做法有待商榷。因为课文的第1段主要讲两个问题:1)营销战略如何在中国成功,2)这些战略如何根据中国人的喜好以及对产品或服务的认知进行调整,而不是具体的产品。也许是准备的时间非常紧迫,选手对课文的理解和归纳出现了偏差。然后,潘老师分析了学生的特点。在教学模式上,她采取以学生为中心、以产出为导向的教学模式。其教学目标包括商务英语知识、商务技能和伦理价值。在具体的教学方法上,她例举了基于任务的教学、基于讨论的教学、案例教学、学生参与的测评等,并强调要综合利用线上线下教学资源。在学习测评上,她采用师生共同参与的方式,以增强教学效果。至于具体的教学步骤,她采用BOPPPS模式,再加课后作业。以上教学方案应该说中规中矩,显示出潘老师对商务英语教学的理论、模式、方法和测评等各要素有比较全面的了解。潘老师最亮眼的表现是在10分钟的时间里,用流利的英语将其教学方案展现出来,而且条理清晰,相关的教学理论、教学方法、商务知识、商务案例均了然于胸,信手拈来,同时口到手到,同步将所讲内容写到白板上,手起笔落,一气呵成。在提问阶段,潘老师的表现依旧出色,理解到位,回答中肯,表现出较高的英语基本功和商务、人文素养。不过有的回答可以再精炼一些。比如在回答第一个问题时,把EGP,EOP,EAP,ESP 的定义都讲了一遍,有点啰嗦。总而言之,潘紫萌在说课中表现突出,是一位素质比较全面、经验比较丰富的优秀商务英语教师。点评专家:陈准民

教育培训更多

基于案例驱动的外语教学研究论文写作

课程目标本期研修课程坚持学以致用理念,力求帮助参训者掌握可复用的论文写作方法,能从自身教学课堂挖掘研究选题,合理选择适配的研究范式,独立完成一篇结构完整、论证严谨的外语教学研究论文;同时反哺教学反思,促使教师以科研视角审视课堂,实现教研相长,助力教师专业发展与课题、论文成果产出。1. 夯实学术基础,优化完整写作流程帮助参训者系统掌握外语教学研究论文的学术规范、结构框架与期刊评价标准,厘清教研论文与教学经验总结、心得体会的核心区别,破除写作认知误区,建立从选题构思、文献梳理、研究设计到成果撰写、总结升华的完整学术写作思维。2. 攻克核心写作难点,掌握分章节实操技巧通过正反案例对比、范文深度拆解,精准掌握论文引言、文献综述、研究设计、结果分析、讨论结语各大核心模块的写作逻辑与行文技巧,有效解决选题宽泛、文献堆砌、研究方法误用、论证薄弱、逻辑脱节等高频问题,熟练规避论文写作常见雷区。3. 精通多元研究范式,适配不同教研场景系统掌握外语教学质化、量化、混合研究三种主流研究方法的适用场景、设计规范与撰写要点,能够结合自身课堂教学场景、研究素材与研究需求,精准选择适配的研究范式,独立完成科学、规范、严谨的研究方案设计。4. 强化科研转化能力,实现教研双向赋能引导参训者学会从日常课堂教学、教学改革、学情分析、课程实践中挖掘学术研究切入点,实现教学经验学术化、课堂案例成果化,具备独立撰写高质量外语教学研究论文的能力,助力论文发表、课题申报等教研成果积累。5. 树立严谨学术思维,提升科研创新素养培养参训者批判性文献研读能力、学术问题提炼能力与研究创新能力,学会精准识别研究空白、提炼研究创新点,掌握行文逻辑、学术规范与校验方法,全面提升外语科研素养与学术写作水平。

AI时代职业院校教师教学能力及数字素养提升专题培训

一、组织单位主办单位:教育部职业教育发展中心承办单位:上海外教社教育培训中心二、课程目标本次培训内容聚焦职业院校AI时代职业院校外语教师教学能力与数字素养提升路径,通过主题讲座、工作坊、案例解析、互动交流、成果展示等环节,重点围绕数字化教学设计、AI技术与教育教学深度融合、数字素养能力提升等核心议题,推动培训成果向教学实践的有效转化。具体包括:1.素养导向,教学为重。课程围绕 AI 赋能职业院校外语教学与教师数字素养提升路径展开,既讲解人工智能重塑外语课堂的全新教学范式,系统拆解《教师数字素养》五大维度标准,又通过实操工作坊手把手教授大语言模型、教学智能体、多模态教学资源开发等工具实操,明确AI工具使用边界,平衡技术应用与立德树人根本目标。2.聚焦外语课堂核心流程优化。采用理论讲授、案例研讨、实操演练相结合的闭环研修模式,覆盖AI辅助教学设计、人机协同口语智能测评等内容,结合岗课赛证融合要求融入跨文化能力培育,针对性解决传统外语教学资源单一、分层教学难、口语评价低效等一线痛点。3.兼顾教学成果产出与外语教师长效专业发展。培训过程组织分组共创、成果展示与互动点评,打磨可复制推广的AI外语教学案例;同时传授借助AI开展文献整理、数据采集、教研论文撰写的方法,以教促研、以研优教,搭建教学转化科研的成长路径。三、课程模块课程模块1AI 时代职业外语教师数字素养深度解读(专题讲座+案例研讨)1. 《教师数字素养》五大维度标准解析:数字化意识、数字技术知识与技能、数字化应用、数字社会责任、专业发展,结合职业外语课堂场景逐条落地解读,明确职校外语教师数字素养能力画像。2. AI 重塑职业外语教学新范式:生成式AI给听、说、读、写、译、跨文化教学带来机遇与挑战;厘清AI工具使用伦理边界、版权风险、认知保护,坚守立德树人根本目标,避免技术滥用与学生思维惰性。3. 优秀案例研讨:优秀职校外语教师数字素养实践案例分享,对比“技术堆砌”和“素养导向”两种课堂模式差异。课程模块2大语言模型辅助职业外语教学设计与实施(案例研讨+实践工作坊)1. 大语言模型基础认知:主流大模型在外语教学各场景中的应用,提示词设计核心原则与技巧。2. 备课环节实操:• AI生成适配高职 / 中职外语的教案、岗位情境任务、分级阅读素材、职场外语对话脚本;• 基于岗课赛证要求,用大模型改造原有课程内容,融入职业场景、跨文化交际任务。3. 课堂教学应用实操:• AI 辅助听力、读写课堂:生成分层练习题、小组讨论议题、课堂辩论素材;• AI辅助写作教学:AI 提供写作初稿、润色、错误诊断、修改建议,教师聚焦高阶思辨、职场语体评价,规避学生直接抄袭 AI 结果。4. 学业评价实操:人机协同批改外语作业。5. 分组实训任务:选取一门自己任教的外语课程,现场完成一份大模型辅助的课时教学设计初稿;小组互评,专家现场点评优化。课程模块3教学智能体赋能外语教学全流程(案例研讨+实践工作坊)1.教学智能体基础:什么是教学智能体,RAG检索增强技术在外语教学的价值;区分通用大模型和定制教学智能体的差异。2.课前辅助:定制专业外语智能助教,导入课程语料、行业岗位外语知识库,生成学情预测试卷,完成学生学情画像。3. 课中辅助:•人机协同口语智能测评实操:智能体作为虚拟对话伙伴,开展职场情景口语模拟,完成发音、流利度测评;教师聚焦交际策略、跨文化表现点评;•课堂分组任务:智能体辅助小组协作,生成任务脚手架,动态收集课堂学习数据。4. 课后辅助:智能体实现分层作业推送、个性化答疑、错题归纳,减轻教师重复性辅导工作。5. 实践任务:基于自己课程,配置简易外语教学智能体,生成一套课前‑课中‑课后完整智能教学流程方案;研讨智能体使用风险,如何避免学生过度依赖 AI。课程模块4AI 赋能课堂思维转型——从知识灌输到高阶能力培育(案例研讨+实操演练+现场产出)1. AI赋能情景式教学:运用5C流程创设情境、设置挑战、生成角色卡、搭建认知脚手架并引导反思,实现A1与课堂情境深度融合。2. AI赋能混合式教学:基于TRACE框架,结合MEAISMILE平台与多智能体协同案例,辅助教师完成混合式课堂改造方案设计。3. AI赋能项目式教学:参照PBL黄金标准与SCALE范式,通过实操练习,辅助教师完成项目式教学全流程设计。课程模块5AI赋能教学成果产出与教师长效专业发展(共创工坊 + 成果展示)1. AI 外语教学案例打磨:分组共创,基于前序模块产出的教学设计,完善完整教学案例,包含教学目标、AI 工具选用、人机分工、实施流程、评价方式、教学反思。2. 成果展示互评:各组展示 AI 外语教学案例,专家点评,形成可复制的优秀案例库素材。3. 训后持续发展路径:如何构建个人AI教学资源库;虚拟教研室、教学共同体建设;线下返岗实践任务布置。

AI智能体对外语科研的重构:选题新思路与研究新路径

一、研修目标1. 选题精准化。借助AI智能体的文献洞察与趋势分析能力,帮助参训者突破信息茧房,精准定位具有学术价值与现实意义的前沿选题,避免低水平重复研究。2.设计系统化。AI智能体辅助构建完整的研究框架,实现从理论选择、方法设计到数据采集方案的全链条逻辑校验,提升研究设计的科学性与严谨性。3.申报高效化。通过智能体的多轮对话与文本优化能力,参训者可在科研论文或项目申报书撰写过程中获得持续的逻辑论证支持、语言表达润色及格式规范检查,显著提高文本质量与申报效率。4.能力可持续化。本项目不仅传授具体工具操作,更注重培养参训者与AI智能体协同工作的思维模式与方法论,以期在研修结束后仍能持续运用智能体技术推动自身学术发展,实现科研能力跃升。二、研修特色1.升级认知,建立科学的技术应用观参训者掌握AI智能体的核心能力特征(自主规划、多步推理、工具调用、协作执行),并能批判性地评估AI智能体在外语科研各环节中的适用边界与伦理风险,建立"人机协同、以人为主"的科研智能体应用观。2.掌握技能,形成智能体科研工作流参训者独立完成AI智能体的配置与定制,熟练运用智能体进行文献综述生成、研究问题提炼、理论框架构建、研究方法设计、项目申报书逻辑论证等核心科研任务,掌握提示词工程、工作流编排、插件调用等关键技术技能,形成个人化的AI智能体科研工作流。3. 产出成果,实施个性化诊断与深度辅导研修前通过问卷与材料预审进行学情诊断,研修中强化晚间一对一深度辅导,帮助参训者在研修期间至少完成一项可交付的科研成果雏形,包括但不限于:一份经过AI智能体辅助优化的科研项目申报书初稿、一个完整的研究设计方案、或一套可复用的AI智能体科研工作流配置文件。4. 共建社群,构建专业发展共同体构建持续活跃的AI智能体应用实践社群,参训者在研修后仍能通过社群进行经验分享、问题互助、资源互通,促进研修成果的持续转化与社群生态的良性发展。三、课程设置(一)课程模块本项目设置四大核心课程模块,层层递进,系统构建参训者应用技术赋能科研的能力。模块一:AI智能体认知与科研赋能理路帮助参训者建立对AI智能体技术的系统认知,理解其在外语科研中的应用逻辑与伦理边界。核心内容包括:AI智能体的技术原理与能力特征解析;AI智能体与通用大语言模型的本质区别;外语科研全链条中AI智能体的赋能节点与适用场景;AI智能体应用的学术伦理规范与风险防范策略;国内外AI智能体赋能科研的前沿案例评析。模块二:AI智能体赋能科研选题与文献综述帮助参训者掌握运用AI智能体进行高效文献检索、趋势分析与选题论证的方法。核心内容包括:AI智能体驱动的文献检索策略与工具调用技巧;基于智能体的研究热点识别与趋势预测方法;AI智能体辅助研究问题提炼与创新性评估;文献综述的智能生成与批判性审校;选题可行性的多维度智能评估框架。模块三:AI智能体赋能研究设计与方案构建培养参训者运用AI智能体进行系统化研究设计的能力。核心内容包括:AI智能体辅助理论框架选择与适配性分析;研究方法的智能推荐与逻辑校验;数据采集与分析方案的自动化构建;研究设计的多轮对话式优化与迭代;AI智能体生成的研究方案的学术规范性审查。模块四:AI智能体赋能项目申报书撰写与优化提升参训者运用AI智能体优化文本质量与论证逻辑的能力。核心内容包括:申报书各部分的智能体辅助撰写策略;论证逻辑的智能校验与强化方法;学术语言表达的智能润色与风格统一;申报书格式规范的自动化检查;基于评审标准的申报书模拟评估与优化建议。(二)课程安排本项目为期两天集中研修,辅以晚间个性化辅导,具体日程安排如下:10月31日 上午8:40-11:50模块一:AI智能体认知与科研赋能理路主要内容:l AI智能体技术原理与能力特征解析;l 外语科研全链条中AI智能体的赋能节点与适用场景;l 实操演示与参训者上机体验10月31日下午14:00-17:10模块二:AI智能体赋能科研选题与文献综述主要内容:l AI智能体驱动的文献检索策略与工具调用;l 研究热点识别与趋势分析;l 选题论证实操与案例研讨10月31日晚间18:30-20:00个性化辅导专场(一)主要内容:参训者携带个人申报材料或研究构想,接受专家一对一深度辅导与智能体配置指导11月1日 上午8:40-11:50模块三:AI智能体赋能研究设计与方案构建主要内容:l AI智能体辅助理论框架选择与研究方法设计;l 数据采集方案自动化构建;l 实操演练与方案互评11月1日下午14:00-17:10模块四:AI智能体赋能申报书撰写与优化主要内容:l 申报书各部分智能体辅助撰写;l 论证逻辑智能校验;l 学术语言润色;l 申报书优化实操与成果展示11月1日晚间18:30-20:00个性化辅导专场(二)主要内容:聚焦参训者研修成果的最终打磨与后续科研规划指导四、专家简介(按姓氏拼音排序)王峰:山东大学翻译学院教授、博士生导师、博士后合作导师,同济大学文学博士、布鲁塞尔自由大学应用语言学博士,国际韩礼德语言学研究会秘书长,山东省泰山学者青年专家。主持国家社科1项,省部级课题4项。研究方向:文体学、话语分析、语料库翻译学。在English Studies, Atlantis, Perspectives, Critical Arts, Humanitiesand Social Sciences Communications,Southern AfricanLinguistics and Applied Language Studies, SAGE Open, Psychology in the Schools,Australian Journal of Linguistics, Style, Target, Functions of Language,Chinese Semiotic Studies, Plos One,《外国语》《中国外语》《中国翻译》《外语教学》《外语研究》《外语教学理论与实践》《外语电化教学》《上海翻译》等国内外核心期刊上发表论文50余篇。杨港:博士、博士后,山东大学外国语学院副教授、硕士生导师。研究方向为外语教学理论与实践,学术兴趣包括 AI 赋能的外语教学设计与评价、外语学习者认知与心理、外语教师发展等;主持国家社科基金一般项目、教育部人文社科研究青年基金项目、中国博士后科学基金面上资助项目、山东省本科教学改革研究项目等课题各1项、山东省社科规划研究项目2项;出版专著2部;主编教材5套14部,其中国家级规划教材6部;发表论文20余篇,其中 16篇收录于CSSCI来源期刊(如《外语界》《外语与外语教学》《外语电化教学》)、SSCI一区期刊(如System, Education and Information Technologies, InternationalJournal of Multilingualism);获评山东省高等教育教学成果二等奖、山东省社会科学优秀成果三等奖和山东省普通高等教育一流教材以及“宝钢教育奖励基金”和“邵一兵教育奖励基金”。主要学术兼职包括:国家社科基金项目成果鉴定专家(获全国哲学社会科学工作办公室颁发的“认真负责的鉴定专家”荣誉称号)、多家CSSCI来源期刊以及SSCI期刊审稿专家等。

特色工具

系统产品

重点教材