新闻听力 | 负能量之人会使身边人加速衰老

负能量之人会使身边人加速衰老How Toxic People Make Us Age Faster常速 | 六级 | 570词 | 4min25s刘立军供稿Part I. QUESTIONSListen to the passage and choose the best answer to each question you hear.Q1. In which scientific journal was the new study on toxic social ties published?A. The Lancet.B. Nature.C. Journal of the American Medical Association.D. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.Q2. What advanced method was used in the study to measure the volunteers’ biological age?A. Blood pressure monitoring.B. Genetic sequencing analysis.C. Hormone level testing.D. DNA methylation-based aging clocks.Q3. What percentage of the volunteers reported having at least one toxic person in their social network?A. 8.1%.B. 10%.C. 28.8%.D. 38.8%.Q4. Why might a toxic spouse have a weaker effect on aging than toxic friends or family members?A. Because people usually spend less time with their spouses than with friends.B. Because the positive aspects of marriage may reduce some negative effects.C. Because toxic friends are generally more aggressive than toxic spouses.D. Because spouses are more likely to receive professional help for their issues.Q5. What is the main message that the passage intends to convey?A. Toxic people accelerate aging and should be avoided to promote healthier aging.B. The biological aging process is determined by a person’s social network.C. Marriage can offer total protection against the negative effects of toxic people.D. Women are more likely than men to have toxic people in their social network.Part II. TRANSCRIPTHow Toxic People Make Us Age FasterHow bad are toxic people for physical health?Supportive and positive social relationships with friends and family members can have many positive effects on health and mental well-being. In contrast, toxic friends or family members that are overly hostile, permanently passive-aggressive, or purposefully difficult can become huge stressors. Chronic stress has all sorts of negative effects on both mental and physical health. For example, stress research has shown that chronic stress can accelerate ageing and increase inflammation.inflammation n. 炎症This implies an intriguing research question: Do toxic people not only worsen our mental health, but do they maybe also have a very real effect on biological age and accelerate the ageing process due to all the stress they cause?A new study on toxic social ties, accelerated aging, and inflammation(Q1) A new study, just published in the prestigious scientific journal “Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America” (or in short: PNAS), was focused on finding out whether toxic people accelerate biological aging (Lee and co-workers, 2026). In the study entitled “Negative social ties as emerging risk factors for accelerated aging, inflammation, and multimorbidity”, (Q2) the research team led by scientist Byungkyu Lee from New York University used an advanced biological method called DNA methylation-based biological aging clocks. This method allowed them to determine the biological age of the volunteers in their study. Overall, data from more than 2,300 volunteers from Indiana were analyzed in the study. For each volunteer, the scientists determined their social networks and whether they had one or more “hasslers” in their social network. “Hasslers” were people who caused the person too much stress and difficulty. Moreover, saliva samples were collected from the volunteers to perform the advanced DNA methylation-based determination of their biological age. Moreover, the volunteers filled out further questionnaires on health and mental health.multimorbidity n. 多病症methylation-based adj. 基于甲基化的hassler n. 困难,麻烦saliva n. 唾液questionnaire n. 问卷;调查表Results of the study: Toxic people accelerate agingOverall, the volunteers identified 8.1 percent of the overall number of people in their social networks as toxic “hasslers.” (Q3) Overall, 28.8 percent of volunteers reported having one or more toxic people in their social networks. 10 percent of volunteers had two or more toxic people in their social network. Women were more likely than men to have at least one toxic person in their social network. Moreover, people who felt like others depended on them a lot were more likely to have toxic people in their network.The analysis showed that each toxic person led to a 1.5 percent faster ageing process. On average, the biological age of volunteers with toxic people in their social networks was 9 months higher than that of people of the same birth age without toxic friends or family members. (Q4) Interestingly, toxic family members or toxic friends had stronger effects on ageing than toxic spouses. This may be the case because the positive effects of marriage, such as reduced loneliness, may buffer some of the negative effects of toxic social contacts. Last but not least, having a toxic person in the social network also affected multiple further biological parameters beyond biological ageing, such as inflammation levels.buffer v. 减缓,减少Take-Away: Stay away from toxic peopleThe study clearly showed that toxic friends or family members have very real biological effects. They not only cause reduced mental well-being and frustration but also accelerate ageing and increase inflammation in the body. (Q5) This suggests that for healthy ageing and general well-being, reducing contact with toxic people is highly important.Part III. KEYQ1. D.【解析】细节题。题目出处为:“A new study, just published in the prestigious scientific journal ‘Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America’ (or in short: PNAS).”。 该句明确指出了期刊名称,即著名的科学杂志《美国国家科学院院刊》(简称PNAS),因此,正确答案为D。Q2. D.【解析】细节题。题目出处为:“The research team used an advanced biological method called DNA methylation-based biological aging clocks. This method allowed them to determine the biological age of the volunteers.”。 意为:“研究团队使用了一种先进的生物学方法,叫做‘基于DNA甲基化的生物年龄时钟’。这种方法使他们能够确定志愿者的生物学年龄。” 因此,正确答案为D。Q3. C.【解析】细节题。题目出处为:“Overall, 28.8 percent of volunteers reported having one or more toxic people in the social network.”。 意为:“总体而言,28.8%的志愿者称其社交网络中有一个或多个‘带有负能量的’的人。” 因此,正确答案为C。Q4. B.【解析】推理题。题目出处为:“Interestingly, toxic family members or toxic friends had stronger effects on ageing than toxic spouses. This may be the case because the positive effects of marriage, such as reduced loneliness, may buffer some of the negative effects of toxic social contacts.”。 意为:“有趣的是,带有负能量的家人或朋友比负能量配偶对衰老的影响更大。这或许是因为婚姻带来的积极影响如减少孤独感等,在一定程度上缓冲了带有负能量的社交关系所带来的部分负面影响。”由此正确答案为B。Q5. A.【解析】主旨题。结合全文,文章的核心观点是远离带有负能量之人以促进健康,减缓衰老,因此,正确答案为A。 (本文图片来源于摄图网,版权归摄图网所有)

新闻听力 | 社交媒体为何让人欲罢不能?

社交媒体为何让人欲罢不能?What Science Can Teach Us About the Pull of Social Media常速 | 六级偏难 | 505词 | 3min18s刘立军供稿Part I. QUESTIONSListen to the passage and choose the best answer to each question you hear.Q1. What does the author say about the DSM-5 and social media addiction?A. It has classified SMA as a distinct mental disorder.B. It does not recognize SMA as a distinct mental disorder.C. It suggests that SMA should be treated with medication.D. It proves that SMA is a form of behavioral addiction.Q2. According to the passage, which personality trait may be a risk factor for compulsive social media behavior? A. Extroversion.B. Agreeableness.C. Neuroticism.D. Conscientiousness.Q3. What can be inferred from the passage about the future of social media addiction research?A. It may lead to legal regulations similar to those for gambling.B. It has already provided clear answers to all related questions.C. It proves that personality is the only cause of social media addiction.D. It shows that social media addiction is less serious than drug addiction.Q4. What question does the author raise regarding children and social media?A. Whether children should be banned from using social media.B. Whether social media should be legislated like tobacco and alcohol.C. Whether children should be guided on what to view on social media.D. Whether social media platforms should be redesigned for children.Q5. What is the main purpose of the passage?A. To argue that social media should be banned for users.B. To describe a court case about social media addiction.C. To prove that social media addiction is a mental disorder.D. To explore the pull of social media and related concerns.Part II. TRANSCRIPTWhat Science Can Teach Us About the Pull of Social MediaYou have probably heard of the social-media addiction trial that recently took place in Los Angeles. A young woman took Meta and YouTube to court, accusing them of making her addicted to social media — and she won.This was an interesting court case, and one that raises many questions — questions that there are currently no clear answers to, but that people ought to think about, especially as they are likely to pop up in many upcoming debates.Social media is extensively used.As many as one in every three people use social media, and in the USA, people are reportedly spending around 6 hours a day on it. In 2025, Facebook was the most popular social media platform with over 3 billion users, closely followed by WhatsApp and Instagram, which both had about 3 billion users. Approximately 60% of the global population use some kind of social media, if not multiple platforms. With such extensive use, it is not strange that social media addiction (SMA) has become a focal point for many researchers.focal adj. 中心的;重要的Is social media addictive? (Q1) It is worth noting that the DSM-5 (the diagnostic tool for psychologists) does not recognize SMA as a distinct mental disorder; it is often discussed as a condition that requires more research. Thus, the conversations around SMA are not necessarily straightforward.DSM-5 《精神障碍诊断与统计手册》第五版diagnostic adj. 诊断的;用于判断的Within the research literature, SMA has been described as a specific form of digital technology addiction. It refers to the excessive and compulsive use of social media platforms, which can lead to detrimental life consequences. SMA shares components with behavioral disorders like gambling, including salience, mood modification, tolerance, withdrawal, conflict, and relapse.compulsive adj. 强迫性的;难以自控的salience n. 显著性relapse n. 复发;重新陷入(不良状态)(Q2) In a study reviewing over 30,000 participants’ scores on media addiction and personality, it was found that neuroticism can be a risk factor for compulsive social media behavior. Even though the relationship was not very strong, it perhaps indicates that some people may be more likely to become addicted. There are other personality characteristics associated with increased likelihood of compulsion, such as narcissism, Machiavellianism, and psychopathy. But it needs to be mentioned that there may be external factors that contribute to the link between excessive social media use and personality. It is even possible that SMA may vary depending on the platform that individuals use.compulsion n. 强迫(行为);难以抗拒的冲动narcissism n. 自恋;自我中心Machiavellianism n. 权谋主义psychopathy n. 精神病态Should social media be legislated?To what extent social media ought to be controlled by law is a difficult question to address. Just as with debates around tobacco, alcohol, and gambling, there are bound to be varied opinions. (Q3) As more researchers appear to agree that SMA may be a genuine addictive disorder, then presumably, as with other substances, it should be managed to reduce potential risks. (Q4) The cognitive complexity involved in deciding what to view online is also one that should be carefully debated when it comes to children. In most societies, children are guided as to what they can watch in the cinema or on television. It is difficult to see why social media ought to be any different.Part III. KEYQ1. B.【解析】细节题。题目出处为:“It is worth noting that the DSM-5 (the diagnostic tool for psychologists) does not recognize SMA as a distinct mental disorder; it is often discussed as a condition that requires more research.”。意为:“值得注意的是,《精神障碍诊断与统计手册》第五版(心理学家使用的诊断工具)并不未将社交媒体成瘾视为一种独立的精神障碍;它通常被视为一种需要进一步研究的状况来讨论。”因此,正确答案为B。Q2. C.【解析】细节题。题目出处为:“In a study reviewing over 30,000 participants’ scores on media addiction and personality, it was found that neuroticism can be a risk factor for compulsive social media behavior.” 意为:“一项针对3万余名参与者在媒体成瘾和人格特质方面评分的研究发现,神经质可能是强迫性社交媒体使用行为的一个风险因素。” 该句明确指出神经质是风险因素之一,因此,正确答案为C。Q3. A.【解析】推理题。题目出处为:“As more researchers appear to agree that SMA may be a genuine addictive disorder, then presumably, as with other substances, it should be managed to reduce potential risks.”。意为:“随着越来越多的研究者似乎认同社交媒体成瘾可能是一种真实存在的成瘾性障碍,那么可以推断,就像对待其他成瘾物质一样,也应对其进行管控,以减少潜在风险。”由此可以推断,正确答案为A。Q4. C.【解析】细节题。题目出处为:“The cognitive complexity involved in deciding what to view online is also one that should be carefully debated when it comes to children. In most societies, children are guided as to what they can watch in the cinema or on television. It is difficult to see why social media ought to be any different.” 意为:“在涉及儿童时,对于在线内容选择所涉及的认知复杂性,也应进行审慎的讨论。在大多数社会中,儿童观看影院或电视节目的内容都会受到引导和限制,而社交媒体在这方面显然不应例外。” 该段表明作者认为儿童在社交媒体上的浏览内容也应受到引导,因此正确答案为C。Q5. D.【解析】主旨题。全文围绕社交媒体的吸引力、是否成瘾、以及应如何应对展开探讨,因此主要探讨社交媒体的吸引力及其引发的担忧,正确答案为D。 (本文图片来源于摄图网,版权归摄图网所有)

新闻听力 | 你愿意被机器人照顾吗?

你愿意被机器人照顾吗?Would You Want to Be Cared for by a Robot?常速 | 六级 | 758词 | 4min59s刘立军供稿Part I. QUESTIONSListen to the passage and choose the best answer to each question you hear.Q1. What does the author say about the world’s population of over-60s?A. It has doubled since 1980 and will double again by 2050.B. It has tripled since 1980 and will double by 2050.C. It has remained stable since 1980.D. It will decrease significantly by 2050.Q2. What function does the exoskeleton serve for the elderly according to the passage?A. It helps them walk faster than normal people.B. It gives them full control of their mobility.C. It completely replaces human carers.D. It automatically chooses walking routes.Q3. What can the robot Clara do according to the passage?A. Cook meals according to dietary needs.B. Tell jokes to improve your emotional well-being.C. Detect changes in your mood and physical state.D. Clean rooms and maintain the gardens.Q4. What can be inferred about using robots in care homes from the passage?A. Robots will completely replace human carers soon.B. Most elderly people will refuse robot care.C. It has been widely accepted by society.D. It raises complex ethical and legal issues.Q5. What is the main purpose of the passage?A. To describe features of various care robots.B. To argue for replacing humans with robots.C. To explore possibilities and concerns of robot care.D. To prove that robot care is better than human care.Part II. TRANSCRIPTWould You Want to Be Cared for by a Robot?It’s Saturday night in the year 2100, and you’re at the quiz night in a care home. The Saturday night quiz is serious business. While the residents battle it out, a team of carers quietly ensures the smooth running of the home. Luna announces the questions. Zach serves dinner and drinks, and Qi-Young administers evening medications. But Luna, Zach, and Qi-Young aren’t human. They’re robots. And one day, they could be your retirement companions.battle it out 拼搏一场One in three people born today will live until they’re 100. (Q1) The world’s population of over-60s has doubled since 1980 to around a billion, and it’s projected to double again by 2050. That’s a lot of people who may one day need additional support to live fulfilling and comfortable lives. Assistive intelligent robots could relieve pressure in understaffed care homes. So what would being looked after by robots actually feel like?Imagine – you’re woken up by your favorite song played by a music robot. Luna, a humanoid, is ready with your perfect brew, milk and sugar selected with precision. (Q2) Luna helps you choose your outfit for your morning walk and assists you into your exoskeleton, an aid that gives you full control of your mobility. humanoid n. 人形机器人exoskeleton n. 外骨骼(装置)You take a stroll around the gardens with your human carer, Dan. You choose your own route, and your exoskeleton responds to your subtle movements and commands, which it picks up via smart wearables, so you’re fully in control. Along the way, you see robots maintaining the beautifully manicured grounds, alerting carers to any potential hazards. You stop to chat to a friend, and if your conversation is cut short, a robot attendant will remember what you were talking about and set up another time for you to chat. manicured adj. 修剪整齐的When you return to your room, it’s been cleaned by a team of housekeeping robots. Unburdened by time-consuming routine tasks, your human carer, Dan, can take his time chatting to residents, giving everyone his full attention. You then enjoy a sumptuous communal breakfast with the other residents and staff. Bruno, the kitchen robot, serves up a feast customized to your personal dietary requirements, allergies, and he doesn’t forget that you hate mushrooms. (Q3) Clara, a humanoid robot with soft silicone skin and a calming voice, assists you with medication. Her senses can immediately detect changes in your mood, walking pattern, or skin temperature. Prakash, a robot designed for emotional well-being, tells you a joke. His AI adapts to each resident’s personality and allows him to keep up to date with their interests, likes, and dislikes. sumptuous adj. 豪华的;丰盛的communal adj. 公共的;共用的customize v. 定制While this scenario may sound idyllic, it’s not without serious considerations. Take, for example, logistics. This vision would mean extensive building redesigns to accommodate robot carers. Care homes of the future would need to take into consideration how robots navigate rough terrain, shared spaces, and moving around one another, all while ensuring that they don’t themselves become mobility hazards for residents. (Q4) And on an ethical and legal level, there’s a ton of complexities with no easy answers. idyllic adj. 田园诗般的;宁静美好的ethical adj. 伦理的;道德的Imagine a scenario where a robot makes a mistake, perhaps administering the wrong medication or failing to alert staff during an emergency. Who or what would be held responsible? And what are the privacy implications of sharing all your personal health data with a robot? And what will all of this mean in terms of maintaining the skills and jobs of human care workers? And then there’s, of course, the question at the heart of what it means to give and receive care. Empathy, emotional support, and human contact are essential for all of us, particularly when we’re at our most vulnerable.implication n. 可能的影响(或后果)While robots may be able to help out with physical caring, health monitoring, and even limited companionship, could they ever be a true substitute for the humans currently doing those jobs? This leads us to perhaps our most important question. Would we have the right to refuse robot care? And how might we be empowered to do so? These aren’t just questions for engineers or policymakers. They’re for all of us. What do we want our care to look like in the future?empower v. 赋予权力;使自主Today’s research looks at how robots can make their own decisions using data from their sensors, other robots, and tech worn by residents and carers. By 2100, robots will be far more capable than they are today. (Q5) If they can allow for more time and attention from human carers and empower our older selves to live safe, dignified, and fulfilled lives, perhaps it’s not a question of if they should be used, but how.dignified adj. 有尊严的Part III. KEYQ1. A.【解析】细节题。题目出处为:“The world’s population of over-60s has doubled since 1980 to around a billion, and it’s projected to double again by 2050.”。 意为:“自1980年以来,全球60岁以上人口数量翻了一番,达到约10亿,预计到2050年将再翻一番。”因此正确答案为A。Q2. B.【解析】细节题。题目出处为:“Luna helps you choose your outfit for your morning walk and assists you into your exoskeleton, an aid that gives you full control of your mobility.”。 意为:“Luna会帮你挑选晨间散步的穿搭,并帮你穿上外骨骼装置,这种装置能帮你完全掌控自己的行动能力。”因此正确答案为B。Q3. C.【解析】细节题。题目出处为:“Clara, a humanoid robot with soft silicone skin and a calming voice, assists you with medication. Her senses can immediately detect changes in your mood, walking pattern, or skin temperature.”。 意为:“克拉拉是一个拥有柔软硅胶皮肤和平静声音的人形机器人,能协助你服药。她的传感器能即时察觉你的情绪变化、步态异常或皮肤温度波动。”因此正确答案为C。Q4. D.【解析】推理题。题目出处为:“And on an ethical and legal level, there’s a ton of complexities with no easy answers.”。 意为:“在伦理和法律层面上,存在着大量错综复杂的问题,且没有简单的答案。”文章随后进一步讨论了如果机器人犯错谁该负责的问题、个人健康数据的隐私问题、对人类护工就业的影响等。由此可以推断,正确答案为D。Q5. C.【解析】主旨题。题目出处为全文,尤其是结尾段落:“If they can allow for more time and attention from human carers and empower our older selves to live safe, dignified and fulfilled lives, perhaps it’s not a question of if they should be used, but how.”。 意为:“如果机器人能让人类护工有更多时间和精力陪伴老人,并能让我们年老时能够安全、有尊严、充实地活着,那么问题或许不在于是否应该使用机器人,而在于如何使用。”文章从未来场景设想出发,既介绍了机器人辅助养老的可能性,也讨论了伦理、法律、隐私等担忧,因此正确答案为C。(本文图片来源于摄图网,版权归摄图网所有)

新闻听力 | 何为智者?

何为智者?What makes a person wise?常速 | 五级(易)| 350词 | 2min18s刘立军供稿Part I. QUESTIONSListen to the news and choose the best answer to each question you hear.Q1. According to the text, what do all cultures not agree on regarding wisdom? A. Its importance in society. B. Its definition and components. C. Its connection to intelligence. D. Its role in spiritual practices. Q2. What are the two characteristics associated with wisdom according to the study? A. Emotional stability and logical reasoning. B. Intelligence and cultural adaptability. C. Compassionate love and spiritual understanding. D. Socio-emotional awareness and reflective orientation. Q3. What can be inferred about the role of emotions in being perceived as wise? A. Emotions should always be suppressed to appear wise. B. Emotions are irrelevant to the perception of wisdom. C. Emotions need to be balanced with logical thinking. D. Emotions are more important than reflective orientation. Q4. What does the apple pie analogy in ‘The Cambridge Handbook of Wisdom’ illustrate? A. Different cultures have their own unique wisdom traditions. B. Wisdom is like an apple pie that everyone enjoys equally. C. Wisdom is universally agreed upon across cultures. D. Wisdom is best understood through spiritual practices. Q5. What is the main purpose of the text? A. To explore the universal definition of wisdom. B. To discuss how wisdom is perceived across cultures. C. To highlight the importance of emotional intelligence. D. To explain the relationship between wisdom and intelligence. Part II. TRANSCRIPTWhat makes a person wise?Think of the wisest person you know. What is it that makes them wise? What qualities do they have? Does wisdom mean the same for you as it does for me? (Q1) All cultures value wisdom, but not all cultures agree on its definition. For some, the focus is on intelligence, while others emphasise compassionate love for others. In some cultures, a spiritual component is required to be considered wise. Are there any aspects of wisdom that all cultures can agree on?compassionate adj. 富有同情心的 A group of 34 researchers from all over the world and from fields like psychology, philosophy and anthropology got together to explore ‘Dimensions of wisdom perception across twelve countries on five continents’. The study found two characteristics that everyone — from urban university students in Peru to villagers in rural India — associated with wisdom.anthropology n. 人类学 perception n. 感知,认识 (Q2-1) The first quality a wise person must have is ‘socio-emotional awareness’. This is about the ability to understand others’ point of view and really care about their thoughts and feelings.(Q2-2) However, this person must also have the second quality: ‘reflective orientation’, which is about using logic and past experience to make judgments. (Q3) If you are mindlessly driven by emotions and don’t think before you act, then you are unlikely to be perceived as wise. So, if you want to be wise, learn to both keep your cool and put yourself in others’ shoes.But, while this study helps us build a more unified definition of wisdom, the world is vast and cultures vary hugely. In ‘The Cambridge Handbook of Wisdom’, the authors make an apple pie analogy, comparing pie to wisdom. Imagine your grandmother makes your favourite apple pie — she represents the wisdom you think is best. Now, imagine you take this apple pie to the Amazon rainforest, where apples don’t grow. For the locals, the pie isn’t as good as their own traditional desserts; they’ve grown up with different flavours and ingredients, (Q4) just as different cultures have developed their own wisdom traditions. Ultimately, the way wisdom is experienced, shared, and valued depends on the cultural ingredients involved.analogy n. 类比,比喻 Part III. KEYQ1. B.【解析】细节题。根据“All cultures value wisdom, but not all cultures agree on its definition.”,可见所有文化都重视智慧,但都对智慧的定义看法不一致。正确答案为B。 Q2. D.【解析】细节题。根据“The first quality a wise person must have is ‘socio-emotional awareness’.”以及“However, this person must also have the second quality: ‘reflective orientation’”,可知研究将智慧与两大特质联系起来。第一个特质是“社会情感认知”,第二个特质是“反思思辨能力”。正确答案为D。 Q3. C.【解析】推理题。根据“If you are mindlessly driven by emotions and don’t think before you act, then you are unlikely to be perceived as wise.”,可知如果被情绪盲目驱使,且在行动前不假思索就不算有智慧,由此可推断,情绪需要与逻辑思维相互平衡,因此正确答案为C。 Q4. A.【解析】细节题。根据“Just as different cultures have developed their own wisdom traditions.”,可知不同文化发展了自己的智慧传统。苹果派的类比意在说明不同文化拥有各自独特的智慧传统,因此正确答案为A。 Q5. B.【解析】主旨题。根据全文,文章主要探讨了智慧在不同文化中的定义和感知方式,因此正确答案为B。 (本文图片来源于摄图网,版权归摄图网所有)

新闻听力 | 最好的管教,从来不是嘶吼

最好的管教,从来不是嘶吼Yelling at Your Child Won’t Work—but Something Else Does常速 | 五级(偏难) | 632词 | 4min9s刘立军供稿Part I. QUESTIONSListen to the passage and choose the best answer to each question you hear.Q1. What does the data from applied behavior analysis (ABA) indicate about the effect of verbal redirections?A. They effectively stop children’s problem behaviors.B. They often make the children’s behaviors worse.C. They work better when combined with rewards.D. They are the most common parenting strategy.Q2. According to the passage, why do parents keep using aversive strategies like yelling?A. They are proven to be scientifically effective.B. They help the child learn self-control faster.C. Parents feel better, and they sometimes work.D. Most parenting experts recommend them.Q3. What happens when parents intend punishment as aversiveness?A. The child’s problem behavior improves at once.B. Both parents and children may find it rewarding.C. The child becomes more afraid of the parent.D. Parents usually stop using punishment entirely.Q4. What can be inferred about the “replacement behavior” strategy mentioned in the passage?A. It rewards good behaviors to reduce bad ones.B. It punishes problem behaviors more strictly.C. It only works for neurodivergent children.D. It asks parents to ignore problem behaviors.Q5. What is the main idea of the passage?A. Yelling is the most effective way to correct children.B. Parents should never use any form of punishment.C. ABA data proves isolation is the best response.D. Aversive strategies backfire; rewarding works better.Part II. TRANSCRIPTYelling at Your Child Won’t Work—but Something Else DoesIn the world of applied behavior analysis (ABA), what matters most is the data. (Q1) Many parents use verbal redirections — often born of anger — to stop their children’s behaviors, even though the data indicate the behaviors don’t actually stop. In fact, they often get worse. In this post, we will explore why yelling at a child seldom works in the long run and how to win the battle of wills with your child.verbal adj. 口头的;言语的redirection n. 转向,此处指教导What Is Punishment?Many modern parenting movements cast punishment in a negative light. However, punishment in ABA is simply the application of an outcome that decreases the chances of a behavior recurring. It is not the harsh (often called aversive) response to a child. But, many folks confuse aversives—yelling, spanking, social isolation—with punishment.recur v. 再发生;反复出现aversive adj. 厌恶的 n. 任何令人不快或痛苦的刺激物spanking n. 打屁股(尤指打小孩)Another form of punishment is often called positive punishment. Positive punishment usually works, while aversives typically are not nearly as effective. So why do people keep using aversive strategies?(Q2) The answer is often that the parent feels better when they yell or place their child alone in a room. Sometimes, using an aversive might even work. If it works just enough—and randomly enough—the decrease or elimination of the child’s problem behavior is rewarding to the parent. That random pattern of success builds a surprisingly durable habit of reaching for aversives. Unfortunately, what works best will never be tried if aversives are the main strategy. But what if there’s a better approach?When Do Punishments Become Rewards?(Q3) When we use punishment to mean aversiveness, what parents intend as punishment often turns into a reward—for everyone involved. Parents feel less anger or stress after yelling at a child, and that reduction in negative emotion is rewarding for them. When children receive attention, even attention that carries angry words, the attention itself can be rewarding. These two dynamics define the major ways “punishments” become rewards.What to Do: 3 Steps to Change a Child’s Behavior1. Define Punishment and Problem BehaviorsKeep in mind that punishment reduces—or eliminates—a problem behavior. By holding onto that as your goal, you can refocus when things get hard. Ask yourself: “What specifically do I want my child to stop doing?”2. Find the Replacement Behavior(Q4) One underused strategy is simply adding something good to a behavior you want to see more of—a replacement behavior. When parents deliberately reward an alternative behavior, the problem behavior gets crowded out. Adding a reward to compete with the problem behavior is more effective, and frankly more pleasant for everyone, than adding a consequence to the problem behavior itself.A problem behavior keeps happening because of what it produces. Attention is often the payoff. If we know the reward is attention, the next question is: What do we want the child to do instead? Once we identify an alternative, we can reward that replacement behavior consistently and drive down the problem behavior simultaneously.simultaneously adv. 同时地3. Change How You ReactThis is the hardest step—and the most important. Parents will need to:Decide what the replacement behavior looks like;Teach it by setting an example;Prompt it in situations that used to trigger yelling;Praise it heavily and pay real attention when the child uses it;Notice it even when unprompted, so the reinforcement stays consistent;Soon, the replacement behavior will take over, and the old triggers will lose their pull.What to Do if You Need HelpParents of neurodivergent children, in particular, often find themselves responding to aggressive or self-injurious behaviors with anxious or angry attention—largely because those behaviors are overwhelming. That’s not failure; that’s human. But outside help can make the difference. Finding a provider with genuine ABA expertise can turn things around faster than going it alone.neurodivergent adj. 神经多样的(大脑处理信息方式异于常人的)Part III. KEYQ1. B.【解析】细节题。题目出处为:“Many parents use verbal redirections — often born of anger — to stop their children’s behaviors, even though the data indicate the behaviors don’t actually stop. In fact, they often get worse.”。 意为:“很多家长一着急就冲孩子吼,想用言语制止他们的行为,可数据显示,这么做根本没用——孩子的行为非但没停,反而常常愈演愈烈。”该句明确指出数据表明口头教导往往使孩子的行为变得更糟,因此正确答案为B。Q2. C.【解析】细节题。题目出处为:“The answer is often that the parent feels better when they yell or place their child alone in a room. Sometimes, using an aversive might even work.”。 意为:“答案其实是:很多时候,父母吼完或者把孩子单独关在房间里,自己心里会觉得好受些。有时候,这种惩罚手段甚至还真能见效。”因此正确答案为C。Q3. B.【解析】细节题。题目出处为:“When we use punishment to mean aversiveness, what parents intend as punishment often turns into a reward—for everyone involved. Parents feel less anger or stress after yelling at a child, and that reduction in negative emotion is rewarding for them. When children receive attention, even attention that carries angry words, the attention itself can be rewarding.” 意为:“当我们把‘惩罚’理解为施加令人不快的刺激时,父母本意是想惩罚孩子,结果却常常变成了对所有人的‘奖励’。父母冲孩子吼完之后,怒气或压力减轻了——这种负面情绪的缓解对他们来说就是一种奖励;而对孩子来说,哪怕得到的是带着怒意的关注,关注本身就足以成为一种奖励。”该句明确指出父母所以为的惩罚实际上对家长和孩子都可能变成一种奖励,因此正确答案为B。Q4. A.【解析】推理题。题目出处为:“One underused strategy is simply adding something good to a behavior you want to see more of—a replacement behavior. When parents deliberately reward an alternative behavior, the problem behavior gets crowded out.”。 意为:“有一个常被忽视的策略,其实很简单:在你希望孩子多做的行为上,主动‘加点甜头’——也就是用一个替代行为来取代问题行为。当父母有意识地去奖励这个替代行为时,原来的问题行为自然就被‘挤掉’了。”因此,正确答案为A。Q5. D.【解析】主旨题。综合全文,文章的核心观点是喊叫等厌恶型策略往往适得其反,而奖励替代行为等积极方法更为有效,因此正确答案为D。(本文图片来源于摄图网,版权归摄图网所有)

新闻听力 | 我们应该害怕人工智能吗?

我们应该害怕人工智能吗?Should we fear AI? 常速 | 五级(偏难)| 345词 | 2min9s刘立军供稿Part I. QUESTIONSListen to the news and choose the best answer to each question you hear.Q1. What is one reason Elon Musk and other experts called for a pause in advanced AI development? A. To address potential risks posed by human-competitive intelligence. B. To promote AI’s use in solving global problems. C. To reduce the economic impact of AI on job markets. D. To advance communication technologies like Skype. Q2. What does The Future of Life Institute suggest about advanced AI systems? A. They should be developed faster to solve global problems. B. They can help reduce poverty in poorer countries. C. They pose profound risks to society and humanity. D. They are unlikely to replace human intelligence. Q3. According to Goldman Sachs, what is one possible impact of AI on the job market? A. AI will eliminate the need for human workers entirely. B. AI could replace 300 million full-time jobs. C. AI may create a productivity boom and new jobs. D. AI will only affect jobs in the technology sector. Q4. What is the main purpose of the passage? A. To explain how AI works in modern technology. B. To discuss the potential benefits and risks of AI development. C. To highlight the economic advantages of AI. D. To promote AI’s use in solving global problems. Q5. What can be inferred about Bill Gates’ view on AI? A. He doubts AI’s ability to address global challenges. B. He suggests governments should collaborate with industry to manage AI risks. C. He believes AI will primarily benefit developed countries. D. He thinks AI development should be paused indefinitely. Part II. TRANSCRIPTShould we fear AI? There is no doubt that artificial intelligence - or AI - has become an important part of our lives. It is no longer just a thing of science fiction: it’s an incredible technological breakthrough that has changed the way we live. (Q4-1) But there are fears that AI has become too intelligent and could be a threat to humanity.This claim might sound extreme, but (Q1) a letter signed by more than 1,000 technology experts, including Tesla boss Elon Musk, called on the world to press pause on the development of more advanced AI because of the risks. Estonian billionaire Jaan Tallinn, for example, who helped develop communication app Skype, thinks we should be cautious. And The Future of Life Institute, a not-for-profit organisation, says that there should be a temporary pause in advanced AI development, saying that (Q2) “AI systems with human-competitive intelligence can pose profound risks to society and humanity.”Tesla n. 特斯拉(公司名,指特斯拉汽车公司) billionaire n. 亿万富翁 This pessimistic outlook is supported by (Q3) a report by investment bank Goldman Sachs that says AI could replace the equivalent of 300 million full-time jobs. But it may also mean new jobs and a productivity boom. We may argue that AI such as chatbots can help us. State-of-the-art ChatGPT, for example, has been helping some students write assignments. AI is allowing computers to think or act in a more human way. And machine learning means computers can learn what to do without being given explicit instructions. The technology is impressive, but as it starts to think for itself, will it outsmart us?Some people are more optimistic. (Q4-2) AI advocates say the tech is already delivering real social and economic benefits for people. Meanwhile, the founder of Microsoft, (Q5) Bill Gates, has called on governments to work with industry to “limit the risks” of AI. But he says the technology could save lives, particularly in poorer countries. He says, “Just as the world needs its brightest people focused on its biggest problems, we will need to focus the world’s best AIs on its biggest problems.” If this happens, maybe humanity will have a future.Part III. KEYQ1. A.【解析】细节题。根据“a letter signed by more than 1,000 technology experts, including Tesla boss Elon Musk, called on the world to press pause on the development of more advanced AI because of the risks.”,可知包括特斯拉老板埃隆·马斯克在内的1000多位技术专家签署了一封信,呼吁全球暂停开发更先进的人工智能,是因为其存在风险。正确答案为A。 Q2. C.【解析】细节题。根据“AI systems with human-competitive intelligence can pose profound risks to society and humanity.”,可知该机构认为具有与人类竞争性智能的人工智能系统可能会给社会和人类带来极大隐患。正确答案为C。 Q3. B.【解析】细节题。根据“a report by investment bank Goldman Sachs that says AI could replace the equivalent of 300 million full-time jobs.,可知高盛报告指出,人工智能可能会替代3亿个全职工作岗位。正确答案为B。 Q4. B.【解析】主旨题。根据“there are fears that AI has become too intelligent and could be a threat to humanity.”以及“AI advocates say the tech is already delivering real social and economic benefits for people”,可知文章先讲述人们担忧 AI 带来的各类风险,可能对人类构成威胁,又介绍AI 带来的社会经济益处,主要讨论了人工智能发展的利弊。正确答案为B。 Q5. B.【解析】推理题。根据“Bill Gates has called on governments to work with industry to ‘limit the risks’ of AI.”,可知比尔·盖茨呼吁政府与行业合作以“限制人工智能的风险”。由此可以推断,比尔·盖茨认为应该合作采取措施管控人工智能的风险,但并非完全暂停发展,因此正确答案为B。 (本文图片来源于摄图网,版权归摄图网所有)

第12届教学大赛商务英语组特等奖潘紫萌授课

授课点评:潘紫萌老师在本次大赛中与来自全国各地的商务英语优秀教师展开激烈角逐,在教学理念、教学方法、课堂设计、英语素质、商务知识、教姿教态、师生互动等方面的表现都较突出,最后以总分第一荣获特等奖。潘老师以准确的英语发音先声夺人,丰富的表达方式、适中的语调语速和端庄的教姿教态也令人印象深刻。在课程设计环节,为实现其教学目标,她选择business ethics作为主题,介绍了教学目标、学生特征、以学生为中心和以产出为导向的教学理念,以及线上线下结合、传统和高科技媒体结合等丰富多彩的教学方式。这份介绍全面立体但简明扼要,为后面的演示(demo)课提供了一个很好的支撑。由于大赛的授课时间有限,潘老师突出重点,在演示课上只展示教学方案的第三步,即participatory learning 1 和 post assessment 1。她采用BOPPPS(bridge in, objectives, pre-assessment, participatory learning, post assessment, summary)模型,通过德国大众汽车减排作假、中国支付宝公益植树项目等案例,教学目标涵盖商务英语知识、技能、以及相关的伦理和价值观等。在短短的十几分钟里要达到这么多项教学目标绝非易事。潘老师通过一系列的短视频、多种教学方法(如听力填空、案例讨论、汉译英、样本对话补正等)以及活泼的师生互动,较好地实现了教学目标,显示出选手突出的课堂组织能力。商务英语教学起源于英美等国,因此基本使用本国素材、讲本国故事。传入中国后,主要使用外国素材、讲外国故事。令人欣喜的是,潘老师注意突出中国特色,多次引用中国案例,讲授中国故事,传播中国价值观。加上她出色的英语基本功和良好的师生互动,使得教学过程十分流畅,也没有不同文化同场展示的违和感。总而言之,潘紫萌老师在授课环节的各方面表现都很优秀。不足之处当然也有。首先, 8’13’’开始的讨论过于仓促,只有18秒, 8’31’’就结束了。由于讨论不充分,在随后的问答环节中,更多的回答似乎来自老师而不是学生。第二个是要增加教学过程的自然自发 (spontaneity)。不知是因为课前多次排练还是老师特意要求,学生的产出只有一次对话(17’40’’)相对自然,其他的多次回答虽准确无误,但都像中国小学生朗读课文或回答问题,语音、语调、语速都过于整齐合一,这不利于培养学生的英语实际表达能力。点评专家:陈准民

第12届教学大赛商务英语组二等奖贺静授课

授课点评:贺静老师授课效果较好,教学目标清楚、教学方法得当、教学程序井井有条。此外,贺静老师口齿清晰,语音语调比较纯正、流利;教态端庄自然,有亲和力,教学过程中与学生互动良好,体现了以学生为主体,教师为主导的教学原则。授课分两部分。第一部分介绍该单元(Empire of Wealth)的总教学安排,用了3分30秒,时间把握得比较好。另外,设计的PPT形式多样,各种图表清楚展现了教学安排。授课开始的第三分钟,PPT显示的该单元总教学目标及三篇课文的教学目标一览无遗,加上贺静老师的阐释,清晰地传递了教学目标和学习目标,这能帮助学生在课堂内外围绕主题有效学习。紧接着,贺静老师借助PPT上的流程图比较详细地介绍了授课课文In Praise of Competitive Urges的教学安排,其中的Problem-centred教学方法对学生发现、分析和解决问题有很大帮助。之后进入第二部分:比赛授课阶段。第二部分具体授课含四个阶段。进入第一阶段Warm-up时,贺静老师显得有点紧张,但很快就调整好了状态。该阶段有教师对课文理解的提问,请学生从课文中找到相关的依据回答问题,这种做法本来值得称道,因为授课不能离开课文。但是,Warm-up阶段是课前准备阶段,因此,贺静老师在Warm-up阶段讲解课文不妥,建议把重点放在教材中的Warm-up Activities上,适当设计一些附加的活动,才符合教学逻辑。此外,在总时间为20分钟且第一阶段用了3分30秒的情况下,Warm-up阶段用了5分1秒显得有点过长。之后是第二阶段Questionnaire Results,贺静老师分析解释了调查表中的信息,谈了自己对问题的看法,期间激励学生思考、回答问题,这对培养学生的独立思考能力及理解课文非常有益。Questionnaire之后进入授课第三阶段:Wealth-flaunting Motivations / Summarizing。炫富动机是课文包含的核心内容之一。因此,讨论炫富动机有助于学生理解课文。教师要求学生从PPT上(视频13')显示的课文段落寻找答案,并要求学生做pair work找到有关的词汇。另外,通过分析课文的修辞寓意,贺静老师阐释了文章作者的真实目的。这一点做得很好。另一方面,根据该单元内容,所授的是“综合商务英语”课程。因此,贺静老师应更多围绕语言难点、篇章结构、写作风格、文法修辞等方面进行解释,让学生对课文有更深层次的理解。第四阶段Assignment在视频18'15"开始。课后作业包括questionnaire设计、调研报告写作、相关阅读作业。这样较好兼顾了综合商务英语课程语言学习和商务实践的教学特点。建议更多以教材内容教学为主,重视语言、篇章教学,在帮助学生充分理解课文的前提下掌握一些商务知识和技能;需要结合课文融入更多的思政教育内容。点评专家:翁凤翔

教育培训更多

2026年暑期全国高校外语骨干教师赴香港大学研修项目

项目简介Evidence-based approach to teaching English as a foreign language in higher education in the AI Era is a three-day intensive summer course designed for university teachers specialising in English language teaching as a common core course.This course explores the transformative impact of generative AI and emerging technologies on language education in higher education. Through a series of workshops, interactive sessions, and collaborative activities, participants will gain practical insights into the issues and challenges for language education, integrating AI tools into teaching practices, advancing scholarship of teaching and learning, and fostering student engagement and motivation in the context of rapidly evolving technological landscapes.This course will provide an opportunity for participants to engage with innovative practices, meet with HKU colleagues from similar fields, and collaborate with peers to design pedagogical studies to support their evidence-based approach to language education.项目目标Upon completing the course, the participants will be able to:1.Evaluate the challenges and needs for language education to meet the evolving needs of higher education.2.Utilise AI and digital tools to enhance teaching practices in language education and critically evaluate their ethical and practical implications.3.Implement scholarship of teaching and learning (SoTL) projects to improve teaching effectiveness and student learning outcomes in language education.4.Develop a teaching-research nexus for better career development.5.Implement evidence-based strategies to cultivate student interest and engagement in language learning in the AI era.项目日程JULY 14• Arriving in Hong Kong• Hotel check-inJULY 15 AM• Welcome by the Vice President of HKU• Campus tour• Issues and challenges in language teaching in the era of generative AIJULY 15 PM• Advancing scholarship of teaching and learning in higher educationJULY 16 AM• Advancing scholarship of teaching and learning in higher educationJULY 16 PM• A visit to CUHK• Fostering student engagement and motivation in the context of rapidly evolving technological landscapesJULY 17 AM• Designing a communication-intensive language course• Multimodality in technology-supported L2 educationJULY 17 PM• Collaborative research-teaching nexus project presentations (in groups)• Award ceremony & closing remarksJULY 18• Returning home*We are committed to delivering the sessions in in-person delivery mode as detailed in the programme rundown; however, please be aware that adjustments (e.g. shifting to online mode, changes in the speakers / topics) may occur due to unexpected circumstances.教学团队Dr. Jannie RoedDr. Jannie Roed is the Director of the Teaching and Learning Innovation Centre (TALIC) at the University of Hong Kong (HKU). With a distinguished career spanning the UK and Hong Kong, Jannie brings extensive expertise in university teachers’ professional development, leadership, teaching development, and mentorship.She is the coordinator of the HKU AdvanceHE Fellowship Scheme (formerly the Higher Education Academy). She currently also directs the Postgraduate Certificate in Academic Practice, driving excellence in academic practice and educator development. She oversees the professional development of university teachers at the university level.Prof. Lily Min ZengProf. Lily Zeng is an Assistant Professor at the Teaching and Learning Innovation Centre (TALIC) and Faculty of Education at the University of Hong Kong (HKU). She had taken on leadership roles in coordinating and delivering key professional development programmes at HKU and created a widely acclaimed MOOC on university teaching, which has been translated into 22 languages.At TALIC, her current roles mainly include teaching in the Postgraduate Certificate programme for HKU teachers and overseeing the Senior Fellowship category within HKU AHE Fellowship Scheme. Her recent research interests and publications focus on the professional development of university teachers, the learning experiences of students in higher education, and adaptive learning.Prof. Lianjiang JiangProf. Lianjiang Jiang (George) is an Assistant Professor of language and literacy education at the Faculty of Education, The University of Hong Kong.He is Deputy Director of the Consortium for Research on Language Policy and Practice (CRLPP) at HKU.His expertise is in multimodality and multiliteracies, with a focus on digital multimodal composing, multimodal assessment / feedback, and digital pedagogies. He works extensively on digital multimodal composing as a valid literacy activity in second language classrooms.He is also the creator of the genre-based model to evaluate digital multimodal composing.He is the Principal Investigator and Co-Principal Investigator of research grants funded by the Research Grants Council and Education Bureau in Hong Kong. He is an awardee of the Macao Humanities and Social Sciences Research Outstanding Achievement Award. He was listed in the World's Top 2% Most-cited Scientists by Stanford University Ranking. He was also listed as an HKU Scholar in the Top 1% by Clarivate Analytics.Dr. Carson Ka Shun HungDr. Carson Ka Shun Hung is a Lecturer and E-learning Technologist at the Teaching and Learning Innovation Centre (TALIC), The University of Hong Kong. He specialises in educational technology and generative AI integration in higher education.He has delivered AI workshops on GenAI toolkit applications, AI agent development with n8n, custom chatbot building, GenAI-enhanced pedagogy design, and discipline-specific GenAI implementation in teaching, learning and assessment. He has led TDG introduction sessions and walk-in clinics for Generative AI innovation projects. He supports technology-enhanced learning initiatives and provides pedagogical guidance for academics across faculties.Prof. Ronnel B. KingProf. Ronnel B. King is an Associate Professor in the Faculty of Education, The Chinese University of Hong Kong, where he leads the Positive Psychology and Education Lab. His research focuses on the factors that underpin motivation, socio-emotional learning, and well-being. He is also keen on leveraging positive psychology / education interventions to enhance these optimal states.He has published more than 250 journal articles on these topics in the top-ranked journals in educational psychology. He is recognised as one of the most prolific educational psychology researchers in Asia and globally, and his citations are at the top 0.05% in the field. He is currently Associate Editor of the British Journal of Educational Psychology, Psychology in the Schools, and The Asia-Pacific Education Researcher. He will lead his team to contribute to this programme.Dr. Michelle RaquelDr. Michelle Raquel is a Senior Lecturer at HKU's Centre for Applied English Studies, holding a PhD in Education and bringing over 20 years of higher education experience. Her pedagogical expertise centres on curriculum design, communication skills integration, and English for specific purposes. As Project Leader of HKU's Communication-intensive Courses initiative since 2018, she leads a university-wide effort to embed communication competencies across the curriculum, building faculty capacity and communities of practice.She has designed multiple English disciplinary courses, chaired the CAES Teaching and Learning Quality Committee, and was part of the team that launched the Writing Across the Curriculum programme at HK Polytechnic University. She also has over 15 years of project management experience across large-scale inter-institutional initiatives and has secured over HKD 20 million in competitive grants. Her scholarship explores innovative pedagogies, diagnostic and classroom-based assessment, and ESP testing. She co-edited Routledge's Quantitative Data Analysis for Language Assessment Volumes I and II.*Additional experts who will be involved will be announced once their time slots are confirmed.合作院校介绍在中国香港您可感受:l 世界先进高等教育环境的熏陶l 多元文化的社会交流l 真实英语环境的浸泡l 宜居宽容的城市氛围l 美丽清洁的自然环境l 高效有序的社会运行机制香港大学l 2026年QS排名全球第11位,较上年提升6位l 多学科跻身全球前列,科研水平卓越,教育学长期稳居世界前5l 教学体系接轨全球,学术环境包容多样l 校园环境雅致,地理位置优越,毗邻香港岛核心区TALICThe Teaching and Learning Innovation Centre (TALIC) is a central teaching and learning centre at the University of Hong Kong.It serves as a distinguished resource hub dedicated to advancing best practices in higher education on local, regional, and global scales. With a vision to set the benchmark for teaching excellence, the centre works collaboratively with educators across disciplines and universities, fosters a community of practice among teachers, and encourages evidence-based approaches.Aligned with the University's strategic objectives, it is committed to enhancing the quality of the student learning experience through holistic and innovative solutions, showcasing innovative teaching methodologies and the scholarship of teaching and learning worldwide, providing professional development tailored for university teachers at early and mid-career stages, and offering consultations for teachers to address diverse educational needs.The centre proudly hosts the first accredited AdvanceHE Fellowship scheme in Hong Kong and a highly-rated MOOC on university teaching available on Coursera.

2026年中国社会语言学夏日书院

二、研修内容1、数据赋能与数字语境下的当代社会语言学创新数字社会全面重塑语言使用场景与研究范式,为语言研究带来新理论和新方法。本届夏日书院聚焦数据驱动语言学、语料库话语研究、语言经济学、数字交际研究四大核心模块,立足实证研究方法,融合语言学、经济学、传播学跨学科视野。聚焦语料库实操、数据量化分析、语言价值建构、线上交际语言生态等前沿议题,解析当下语言生活新形态。助力研修学员更新研究工具、拓宽学术边界,夯实实证研究能力,把握社会语言学数字化、综合化发展新趋势。每个授课模块均包含理论与方法讲解、具体研究案例的展示与分析,帮助学员建立相关领域的基本分析思维、了解选题和研究方法。2、从日常观察到研究:研究建构原则与方法不少人善于发现有趣的语言现象,但欠缺研究设计与问题建构能力。本课程立足学员真实困惑,聚焦核心痛点,指导学员如何将日常关注、个人感兴趣的社会语言现象,转化为规范可行、具备学术价值的研究问题,并做出切实可行的研究方案。授课专家将系统拆解研究建构完整流程与底层原理,围绕现象提炼、概念界定、问题聚焦、路径规划、方法匹配等关键环节展开讲授。结合真实案例剖析、实操引导与互动答疑,帮助学员建立规范研究思维,掌握研究设计能力。三、研修日程DAY 1(7月15日)14:00~20:00 学员报到DAY 2(7月16日)08:15~08:30开班式上海外语教育出版社副社长 叶青博士致辞主持人:贵州师范大学外国语学院副院长于昌利教授08:30~10:00数据驱动语言学(复旦大学 刘海涛教授)10:10~11:30 数据驱动的语言建模与量化分类(江南大学 周晨亮副教授)14:30~17:30语言经济学研究(山东大学 张卫国教授)19:00~21:00 从日常观察到研究:研究构建原则与方法(上海外国语大学 赵蓉晖教授)DAY 3(7月17日)08:30~11:30 基于语料库的话语研究(上海外国语大学 苏杭教授)14:30~17:30 数字交际研究(四川外国语大学 赵永峰教授)19:00~21:00 学术期刊面对面(教育部语言文字应用研究所 郭龙生教授)DAY 4(7月18日)学员返程或参加第十六届中国社会语言学国际学术研讨会*研修日程最终以主办提供的会务手册为准。四、授课专家及课程(按授课先后排序)1、刘海涛《数据驱动语言学》主讲专家简介:刘海涛,复旦大学文科资深教授,外文学院博导。教育部“长江学者”特聘教授,国务院政府特殊津贴专家,国家社科基金重大项目首席专家。主要研究方向:数据驱动语言学、计算认知科学、数字人文、语言规划。《中国社会科学》等多种学术出版物编委会成员。在《中国社会科学》《科学通报》《中国语文》《外语教学与研究》等国内外近百种文、理、工出版物用多种语言发表过涉及数十种人类语言的文章450余篇。连续12年入选爱思唯尔“中国高被引学者”榜单。10多项研究成果获得教育部或省级优秀社科奖。课程简介:课程将系统阐释如何从真实语言数据中发现语言系统的概率性规律。课程将围绕索绪尔提出的“线条性”和“系统性”两大基点展开,向研修学员介绍一种不同于传统思辨式研究的数理实证方法。刘海涛教授将为研修学员深入剖析从大规模真实语料(依存树库为主)中挖掘数据,再到运用数据建构模型和研究变量(如词频、依存句法关系等),并最终揭示语言结构、认知机理与演化规律的完整研究路径。2、周晨亮《数据驱动的语言建模与量化分类》主讲专家简介:周晨亮,江南大学外国语学院副教授。主要研究兴趣为语言演化、数字人文与计量历时语言学。基于大规模语料库,运用计算与计量语言学方法,关注语言谱系、世界英语分化及社会—语言的协同演变关系。相关成果发表于《外语学刊》、Digital Scholarship in the Humanities、Lingua、Journal of Multilingual and Multicultural Development 等学术刊物;担任多家SSCI、A&HCI期刊审稿人;参与国家社科基金及省部级课题若干。课程简介:承接前一课对语言“线条性”与“系统性”的理论探讨,本节课程将带领学员走进数据驱动语言学的具体研究实践。课程以语言分类等经典任务为例,系统展示如何将宏观的语言学问题,转化为可量化求解的计算问题。我们将拆解完整的研究设计链路:从真实语料的选取,到语言特征的提取与变量建模,再到利用计算方法让语言的亲疏关系与潜在结构“从数据中自然浮现”。通过具体案例剖析,本课程旨在为学员提供一套可迁移的数据驱动研究方法,打通从“观察真实语料”到“获得实证发现”的实践闭环。3、张卫国《语言经济学研究》主讲专家简介:张卫国,山东大学经济研究院教授、博士生导师,山东大学语言经济研究中心主任,是国内语言经济学领域的核心学者和领军人物之一。兼任美国哥伦比亚大学国际外语教师教育中心与上海外国语大学中国外语战略研究中心客座研究员。已在《经济研究》《世界汉语教学》《语言教学与研究》、《语言战略研究》、Technology in Society、Language Problems and Language Planning、Language Policy 等国内外经济学、语言学权威和重要期刊,以及《人民日报》《光明日报》《中国社会科学报》等重要报纸上发表论文70余篇,多篇论文被《新华文摘》《中国社会科学文摘》、《高等学校文科学术文摘》及人大复印资料等全文转载,国际语言政策与规划权威工具书The Routledge Handbook of Language Policy and Planning唯一的中国学者贡献者;主持国家社科基金、国家语委重大科研项目、教育部国际中文教育研究课题重大项目、教育部人文社科研究基金、山东省自然科学基金等项目课题十余项;科研成果获得全国优秀博士学位论文提名论文(2010) 、山东省优秀博士学位论文(2009)、山东省社会科学优秀成果二等奖等荣誉和奖励。《语言的经济学分析:一个基本框架》等著作在学界产生了重要影响,其博士论文是国内首篇系统建构语言经济学理论体系的博士论文。课程简介:语言与经济的关联在日常语言生活中屡见不鲜,但如何将这种现象转变为系统的学术研究,构建具有解释力的分析框架?本模块将系统介绍语言经济学的理论源流与核心命题,帮助研修学员从经济学的眼光重新认识语言的功能与价值。课程围绕三个基本命题展开:语言能力是一种人力资本,官方语言是一种公共产品,社会语言是一种制度。张卫国教授将带领研修学员探讨语言技能与劳动收入的关系、语言政策和规划的经济学分析、国际中文教育的经贸效果、语言与制度经济学的互动等前沿话题。4、赵蓉晖《从日常观察到研究:研究建构原则与方法》主讲专家简介:赵蓉晖,上海外国语大学教授、博士生导师,教育部“新世纪优秀人才”,上海领军人才,教育部哲学社会科学重大攻关项目首席专家。长期致力于社会语言学、语言政策与语言教育、语言及语言学史研究,主张“立足世界看语言,透过语言看世界”。现任国家语委科研基地暨国家语言文字智库中国外语战略研究中心执行主任、中国语言学会社会语言学分会会长、中国语言学会语言政策与语言规划专业委员会副会长等。主持国家社科基金项目等近29项。在《中国社会科学》等国内外期刊、报纸发表论文140余篇,出版著作28部,获上海市哲学社会科学优秀成果奖、上海市优秀教学成果奖等。正在主编《世界语言生活状况报告》《中国社会语言学》和“语言政策与语言教育”等多个学术丛书。课程简介:很多研究者会感觉到,日常生活中的语言现象看似有趣,却常常不知如何将其转化为可操作、有深度的研究课题。本模块立足学员的真实困惑,聚焦这一普遍而关键的学术“痛点”。赵蓉晖教授将系统拆解从“日常观察”到“规范研究”的整体建构过程,从现象提炼与问题意识的萌发,到概念界定与文献对话,再到研究焦点的逐步聚焦、研究路径的规划以及具体方法的选择与匹配,逐一讲解背后的原理与操作要点。课程将结合大量真实案例进行剖析,涵盖社会语言学多个经典和新兴话题,通过对比“原始困惑”与“成型设计”,让学员直观感受到研究问题逐步精准化的过程。同时设置实操引导与互动答疑环节,帮助学员破解选题宽泛、问题模糊、逻辑链断裂等常见难题。本模块旨在帮助学员建立规范的研究思维,掌握一套可直接落地、经得起学术检验的研究设计能力,提升中青年学者的核心竞争力。5、苏杭《基于语料库的话语研究》主讲专家简介:苏杭,伯明翰大学博士,北京航空航天大学博士后,现为上海外国语大学语言科学研究院教授、博士生导师。研究兴趣包括语料库语言学、系统功能语言学、语用学、学术英语等;主持完成国家社科基金、中国博士后基金等科研项目三项,出版著作两部,在Applied Linguistics、《外语教学与研究》等期刊发表论文50余篇。学术兼职包括中国英汉语比较研究会功能语言学专业委员会常务理事、中国英汉语比较研究会语料库语言学专业委员会理事、Journal of English for Academic Purposes编委等。曾入选“重庆英才•青年拔尖人才”支持计划、第四批重庆市学术技术带头人后备人选,获得重庆市社会科学优秀成果奖二等奖(2024)、高等教育(研究生)国家级教学成果奖二等奖(2023)以及重庆市高等教育教学成果奖三等奖(2022)等奖项。课程简介:课程系统梳理基于语料库的话语研究的核心方法、分析框架及其在人工智能时代的发展前景。首先,报告回顾传统的基于语料库话语分析研究,重点讨论关键词分析、搭配分析等经典方法及其在揭示话语特征、意义建构和意识形态表达方面的作用。其次,报告介绍较为复杂的基于语料库的话语分析框架,尤其聚焦局部语法视角下的批评话语分析,探讨其如何融合定量描写与定性阐释,以探讨语言、话语和社会之间的关联。最后,报告讨论大语言模型辅助的语料库话语研究,重点分析其在研究设计和数据解释等方面带来的新机遇,以及在结果可靠性、方法透明性和研究伦理等方面提出的挑战。报告旨在概述基于语料库的话语研究的核心方法和研究现状,并探讨人工智能时代如何进一步推动该领域的方法创新与理论发展。5、赵永峰《数字交际研究》主讲专家简介:赵永峰,四川外国语大学副校长,外国语言学及应用语言学专业、英语语言文学(英语语言理论与应用方向)教授、博士生导师、博士后合作导师,国家级重大人才工程青年学者、重庆市“巴渝学者计划”特聘教授(2024),四川外国语大学嘉陵优秀人才,中国语言学会社会语言学分会副会长,重庆市外文学会副会长,中国英汉语比较研究会中西语言哲学专业委员会副会长,华夏文化促进会体认语言学专委会副会长。主要研究领域为认知语言学、认知社会语言学、语用学、政治话语分析和语言哲学。主持完成国家社科基金项目1项和多项省级教学科研项目,在《外语教学与研究》《现代外语》、Pragmatics and Society等刊物发表论文40余篇;获各类教学科研奖项10余项,其中2022年获重庆市教学成果奖三等奖,2023年获国家级教学成果二等奖(第一完成人)。课程简介:数字技术已全面嵌入当代人际交往,线上聊天、社交媒体、虚拟社群等场景不断催生新的语言变体与交际模式,也对传统社会语言学的分析框架提出了挑战。本课程立足赵永峰教授在认知社会语言学领域长期积累的研究经验,将认知语言学与社会语言学的基本方法融合,系统阐释如何在数字语境中开展交际研究。课程将首先辨析数字交际的基本特征及其与传统面对面交际的本质差异,进而介绍数字话语的收集、标注与分析路径。在此基础上,赵教授将结合具体研究案例,探讨线上身份建构、网络语言的认知机制以及数字文本中的立场表达等前沿问题,帮助学员建立一套适合数字时代的社会语言学研究视角。课程注重理论与实操结合,旨在为研修学员在数字语境中发现研究选题、选择研究方法提供可直接借鉴的分析工具和思路。

AI时代外国文学研究方法与学术创新系列研修课程(第一期)

03.研修日程时间:2026年7月28日至7月29日形式:线上研修(腾讯会议)*研修须知等相关文件将于报名后一周内发送至邮箱,请注意查收。最终日程以开班前发放的研修手册为准。第一天(7月28日)08:30—08:40 开班式08:40—10:10 虞建华(上海外国语大学)10:20—11:50 查明建(上海外国语大学)14:00—15:30 李锋(中国海洋大学)15:40—17:10 陈广兴(上海外国语大学)第二天(7月29日)08:40—10:10 杨金才(南京大学)10:20—11:50 张和龙(上海外国语大学)14:00—15:30 尚必武(上海交通大学)15:40—17:10 张曼(上海外国语大学)04.主讲专家(以姓氏拼音为序)陈广兴:文学博士,上海外国语大学文学研究院研究员、博士生导师,《英美文学研究论丛》编辑部主任,美国科罗拉多大学英语学院访问学者。主要研究方向为文学理论、美国当代小说、西方马克思主义等。在《外国文学研究》《外国文学评论》《当代外国文学》《中国比较文学》等期刊及报纸上发表论文近50篇,出版专著2部、译著8部,主持和参与国家级、省部级项目多项。李锋:中国海洋大学外国语学院教授、博士生导师、博士后合作导师,《中国外语研究》副主编,郑州大学英美文学研究中心兼职研究员,曾任职于上海财经大学外国语学院(副院长、校研究生教指委委员),哥伦比亚大学英语系(富布赖特研究学者),上海外国语大学(教授、博士生导师、校科研与学术伦理委员会委员)。李锋教授重点关注英美或然历史小说、穿越小说、犹太大屠杀叙事等,共主持国家社科基金项目3项,出版《20世纪美国文学中的经济背景与商业文化》《不曾发生的历史:当代美国或然历史小说研究》等专著和《后现代主义诗学》《巨匠与杰作》等译著。尚必武:上海交通大学特聘教授,教育部“重大人才工程计划”特聘教授,欧洲科学院外籍院士,博士生导师,外国语学院院长, Frontiers of Narrative Studies (ESCI)主编,English Studies (A&HCI) 副主编, Narrative Studies across Humanities (Springer)丛书主编,Arcadia (A&HCI), InterdisciplinaryStudies of Literature (A&HCI), Kritika Kultura (A&HCI),《外国文学研究》《中国比较文学》《当代外语研究》等国内外期刊编委,国家社科基金重大项目首席专家。主要从事英美文学、叙事学、文学伦理学批评等领域的研究,出版专著四部,在《文学评论》《外国文学研究》《文艺理论研究》、Philosophy and Literature, Journal of Narrative Theory, Critique:Studies in Contemporary Fiction等刊物发表A&HCI、CSSCI论文百余篇,研究成果先后荣获教育部高等学校人文社科优秀科研成果奖二等奖、三等奖、上海市哲学社会科学优秀成果奖一等奖、二等奖等。杨金才:南京大学教授、博士生导师,《当代外国文学》主编,国家级人才项目特聘教授。先后主持国家社科基金重大项目、重点项目、一般项目、教育部人文社科规划项目等多项,在国内外学术刊物发表论文200余篇,出版专著5部,教育部国家级规划教材4部,编、译著14部和其他教材多部。曾获中国高校人文社会科学研究优秀成果二等奖、江苏省哲学社会科学优秀成果一等奖、国家级教学成果一等奖和二等奖、宝钢优秀教师奖等。主要兼职包括国务院学科评议组成员、全国美国文学研究会会长、中国外国文学学会副会长、中美比较文化研究分会副会长、英语文学研究分会副会长、江苏省外国文学学会会长等。虞建华:上海外国语大学教授,博士生导师。曾任上海外国语大学英语二系主任、法学院院长、语言文学研究所所长及文学研究院院长,曾任全国高校外语专业教学指导委员会委员、中国外国文学学会英语文学研究分会会长、中国英汉比较研究会副会长、全国美国文学研究会常务理事、上海市突出贡献专家协会常务理事、上海作家协会会员、上海翻译家协会会员、国内核心刊物《英美文学研究论丛》创刊主编、名誉主编及《外国语》《译林》《中南大学学报》《外语与翻译》《英语研究》等杂志的编委。曾担任上海外语教育出版社西方文论丛书编委、博学文库编委。主持国家社科重点项目“美国历史‘非常’事件的小说再现和意识形态批判”、国家社科后期资助项目“美国文学大辞典”和省部级项目5项,其中《美国文学大辞典》获教育部哲学社会科学优秀成果一等奖;参与国家社科重大项目2项成果的撰写。查明建:博士,教授,博士生导师,美国哈佛大学富布莱特高级研究学者,曾任上海外国语大学科研处副处长、文学研究院副院长、英语学院院长、研究生部主任、副校长等。主要研究方向为比较文学理论、翻译文学研究、中外文学关系研究。著作有《中国现代翻译文学史(1898-1949)》(合著)、《中国20世纪外国文学翻译史(1898—2000》(上、下卷)(合著)、《一苇杭之:查明建教授讲比较文学与翻译研究》等,译著有《比较文学批评导论》《什么是世界文学》《非洲短篇小说选集》等。张和龙:上海外国语大学文学研究院教授,博士生导师/博士后导师,英美文学研究中心主任,《英美文学研究论丛》执行主编,英国文学学会副会长,上海市外国文学学会秘书长、常务理事,上海翻译家协会理事,中美比较文化研究会理事。曾任上外法学院副院长、法学院副院长(主持工作)、文学研究院副院长等职。2002-2003年英国剑桥大学英文系访问学者,2010-2011年美国耶鲁大学英文系富布赖特访问学者。2007年获教育部直属院校宝钢优秀教师奖。张曼:上海外国语大学教授、文学博士,《中国比较文学》杂志编审。美国德州大学、哈佛大学高级访问学者。主要研究方向为翻译文学、中外文学关系、比较文学理论。出版专著:《老舍中外文学关系研究》《老舍翻译与其作品英译研究》《中国俄罗斯文学研究史论》(合著)、《新中国外国文学研究60年》(合著)、《国外汉学史》(合著);译著《非洲短篇小说选》。

特色工具

系统产品

重点教材